Cited by 453SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Effectiveness of COVID-19 booster vaccines against COVID-19-related symptoms, hospitalization and death in England

Open access
Andrews, Nick, Stowe, Julia, Kirsebom, Freja, Toffa, Samuel, Sachdeva, Ruchira, Gower, Charlotte, Ramsay, Mary, Lopez Bernal, Jamie·2022·Nature Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Booster vaccination with messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines has been offered to adults in England starting on 14 September 2021. We used a test-negative case–control design to estimate the relative effectiveness of a booster dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) compared to only a two-dose primary course (at least 175 days after the second dose) or unvaccinated individuals from 13 September 2021 to 5 December 2021, when Delta variant was dominant in circulation. Outcomes were symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and hospitalization. The relative effectiveness against symptomatic disease 14–34 days after a BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) booster after a ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca) and BNT162b2 as a primary course ranged from around 85% to 95%. Absolute vaccine effectiveness ranged from 94% to 97% and was similar in all age groups. Limited waning was seen 10 or more weeks after the booster. Against hospitalization or death, absolute effectiveness of a BNT162b2 booster ranged from around 97% to 99% in all age groups irrespective of the primary course, with no evidence of waning up to 10 weeks. This study provides real-world evidence of substantially increased protection from the booster vaccine dose against mild and severe disease irrespective of the primary course.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-022-01699-1

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [2]Ismail SA Effectiveness of BNT162b2 mRNA and ChAdOx1 adenovirus vector COVID-19 vaccines on risk of hospitalisation among older adults in England: an observational study using surveillance data. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021 21 1539 1548 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30882-3 34174190 PMC8221734 · DOI
  2. [4]Pritchard E Impact of vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 cases in the community: a population-based study using the UK’s COVID-19 infection survey Nat. Med. 2021 27 370 1378 10.1038/s41591-021-01410-w PMC8363500 34108716 · DOI
  3. [9]Goldberg Y Waning immunity of the BNT162b2 vaccine: a nationwide study from Israel. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021 385 e85 10.1056/NEJMoa2114228 34706170 PMC8609604 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [13]Lopez Bernal J Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on covid-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: test negative case-control study BMJ. 2021 373 n1088 10.1136/bmj.n1088 33985964 PMC8116636 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrews, N., Stowe, J., Kirsebom, F., Toffa, S., Sachdeva, R., Gower, C., Ramsay, M., & Lopez Bernal, J.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • UK Health Security Agency (GB)
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2022-01-14
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
831-837
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W4205395943
Cited by
453
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 140 · 2022: 182 · 2021: 11
FWCI
51.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
COVID-19 booster vaccination, BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, vaccine effectiveness, waning immunity, Delta variant, hospitalization, COVID-19 mortality, real-world evidence
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, mRNA Vaccines, BNT162 Vaccine, Adult, England, Hospitalization, Humans, Infant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review