A gut microbial signature for combination immune checkpoint blockade across cancer types
Open accessAbstract
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte protein 4 (CTLA-4) can induce remarkable, yet unpredictable, responses across a variety of cancers. Studies suggest that there is a relationship between a cancer patient’s gut microbiota composition and clinical response to ICB; however, defining microbiome-based biomarkers that generalize across cohorts has been challenging. This may relate to previous efforts quantifying microbiota to species (or higher taxonomic rank) abundances, whereas microbial functions are often strain specific. Here, we performed deep shotgun metagenomic sequencing of baseline fecal samples from a unique, richly annotated phase 2 trial cohort of patients with diverse rare cancers treated with combination ICB ( n = 106 discovery cohort). We demonstrate that strain-resolved microbial abundances improve machine learning predictions of ICB response and 12-month progression-free survival relative to models built using species-rank quantifications or comprehensive pretreatment clinical factors. Through a meta-analysis of gut metagenomes from a further six comparable studies ( n = 364 validation cohort), we found cross-cancer (and cross-country) validity of strain–response signatures, but only when the training and test cohorts used concordant ICB regimens (anti-PD-1 monotherapy or combination anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4). This suggests that future development of gut microbiome diagnostics or therapeutics should be tailored according to ICB treatment regimen rather than according to cancer type.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a phase 2 trial of combination anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 in diverse rare cancers (n = 106), strain-resolved baseline gut microbial abundances predicted response and 12-month PFS better than species-level abundances or clinical factors. A meta-analysis of six external cohorts (n = 364) found cross-cancer and cross-country validity only when training and test cohorts used concordant ICB regimens, suggesting microbiome signatures are regimen specific.
Key findings
- Strain-resolved abundances gave the best predictive performance: AUC = 0.73 for response versus progression (RvsP) and AUC = 0.70 for 12-month PFS, versus clinical factors alone at AUC = 0.56 for RvsP and AUC = 0.65 for PFS12; performance increased monotonically with taxonomic resolution (Kendall P = 1.1 × 10⁻¹¹ for RvsP, P = 7.1 × 10⁻¹⁵ for PFS12).
- Leave-one-histology-out cross-validation across GYN, NEN and UGB cancer cohorts yielded an overall mean AUC = 0.75, supporting tumor-agnostic potential within the trial.
- The top 22 strains were mostly gram-positive (20/22) and Firmicutes (18/20); positive strains clustered in Ruminococcaceae including four Faecalibacterium strains, while negative strains included Bifidobacterium dentium, Akkermansia muciniphila B and Spyradocola merdavium. The acetyl-CoA butyrate pathway was complete in 5/5 positive top-22 Ruminococcaceae and 0/2 negative top-22 Ruminococcaceae, but strain-agnostic but + buk abundance was not significantly enriched in responders.
- External validation showed modest generalizability of the CA209-538 strain-RvsP signature to CICB cohorts (mean AUC = 0.65) but no generalizability to anti-PD-1 cohorts (mean AUC = 0.51); cross-study predictions were better for concordant than discordant ICB regimens (Mann-Whitney U test P = 2.8 × 10⁻⁷).
Methods
- Discovery cohort: CA209-538 phase 2 trial (NCT02923934) of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in 120 enrolled patients with advanced rare cancers; 106 baseline fecal samples underwent deep shotgun metagenomic sequencing (median 20.4 million paired-end reads). A custom genome-resolved reference database of 1,397 strain genomes covering 904 known species plus 34 new strains was used, with Bowtie 2 and inStrain for mapping and quality control.
- Supervised machine learning: random forest classifiers with 20-times repeated fivefold cross-validation and a 1,000-iteration random hyperparameter search; endpoints were RvsP (CR/PR versus PD/cPD, excluding SD n = 29) and PFS12; SHAP TreeExplainer was used for feature importance.
- Meta-analysis: six external shotgun metagenomic studies (n = 364; total n = 470, n = 383 after excluding SD) were reanalyzed uniformly and split by ICB regimen (CICB versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy); pairwise train/test comparisons across cohorts and PERMANOVA for metadata variance were performed.
Limitations
- Stated: small individual and total sample sizes limit statistical power; metagenome-assembled genomes may contain errors such as fragmentation, assembly breaks and contamination; lack of fecal strain culturing due to the collection medium prevented in vitro and in vivo mechanistic testing and causality confirmation; external signature performance fell short of clinical use.
- Stated/evident: cross-cohort heterogeneity in fecal collection and DNA extraction methods was present, and the authors did not batch-correct beyond CLR transformation, so technical and geographic confounding may remain.
- Evident: the discovery cohort comprised Australian patients with rare cancers while external cohorts were mostly melanoma; the primary endpoint excluded SD patients, and leave-one-histology-out analyses had small groups, so generalizability and the utility of predictions within SD remain uncertain.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 29 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
A PERMANOVA of baseline microbial variance versus a moving PFS threshold revealed a peak association at <4 months.
“A PERMANOVA of baseline microbial variance versus a moving PFS threshold revealed a peak association at <4 months (Extended Data Fig. 1e)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ A gut microbial signature for combination immune checkpoint blockade across cancer types
There is a negative monotonic association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and BOR (Kendall P = 0.0033).
“and a negative monotonic association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and BOR (Kendall P = 0.0033) (Extended Data Fig. 1c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ A gut microbial signature for combination immune checkpoint blockade across cancer types
There is a strong positive monotonic association between albumin and BOR (Kendall P = 0.0056).
“we found a strong positive monotonic association between albumin and BOR (Kendall P = 0.0056)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
These top 22 strains were neither rare (<5% prevalent) nor core (>50% prevalent) taxa within the cohort.
“Interestingly, these strains were neither rare (<5% prevalent) nor core (>50% prevalent) taxa within our cohort (Extended Data Fig. 3b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There are gross microbial compositional differences by BOR group (PERMANOVA P = 0.0319).
“We then assessed intersample beta diversity using the Aitchison distance and also found gross microbial compositional differences by BOR group (permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) P = 0.0319) (Fig. 1f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
The mean AUC of the left-out group in leave-one-group-out cross-validation was consistently superior to that of a random model (overall mean AUC = 0.75).
“Notably, the mean AUC of the left-out group was consistently superior to that of a random model (overall mean AUC = 0.75) (Fig. 2c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fifteen of the 22 top strains appeared to have a negative association with response in the discovery cohort.
“Conversely, 15 of the 22 strains appeared to have a negative association with response in our discovery cohort.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Twenty-two strains were within half as impactful as the most important strain (a strain of Faecalibacterium sp900539885, an uncultured species).
“Twenty-two strains were within half as impactful as the most important strain (a strain of Faecalibacterium sp900539885, an uncultured species), which we opted to focus on subsequently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 22 top strains identified by SHAP are biologically meaningful and not artifacts of the model.
- Findingown data
Clinical factors alone were poorly predictive of RvsP (mean ROC AUC = 0.56).
“Interestingly, we found that clinical factors alone were poorly predictive of RvsP (mean receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) = 0.56) (Fig. 2b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ A gut microbial signature for combination immune checkpoint blockade across cancer types
RECIST 1.1 best overall response (BOR) was strongly associated with PFS and OS.
“with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 best overall response (BOR) being strongly associated with PFS and OS (Fig. 1c,d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Patient PFS at 12 months (PFS12) or OS at 12 months was associated with little microbial variance.
“By contrast, patient PFS at 12 months (PFS12) or OS at 12 months was associated with little microbial variance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Baseline subspecies (strain-level) gut microbial abundance signatures of response reproduce between cancer subtypes and externally to published CICB cohorts despite marked cohort heterogeneity.
“Using a bespoke, genome-resolved metagenomics approach, we discovered baseline subspecies (strain-level) gut microbial abundance signatures of response that reproduce between cancer subtypes and externally to published CICB cohorts despite marked cohort heterogeneity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Clinical factors were more predictive of PFS12 (AUC = 0.65) than of RvsP.
“In contrast, clinical factors were more predictive of PFS12 (AUC = 0.65; Extended Data Fig. 2b)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ A gut microbial signature for combination immune checkpoint blockade across cancer types
Cross-cancer (and cross-country) validity of strain-response signatures was found, but only when the training and test cohorts used concordant ICB regimens (anti-PD-1 monotherapy or combination anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4).
“Through a meta-analysis of gut metagenomes from a further six comparable studies (n = 364 validation cohort), we found cross-cancer (and cross-country) validity of strain-response signatures, but only when the training and test cohorts used concordant ICB regimens (anti-PD-1 monotherapy or combination anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The remaining four 'negative' strains belonged to the species Bifidobacterium dentium, A. muciniphila B and Spyradocola merdavium.
“The remaining four 'negative' strains belonged to the species Bifidobacterium dentium, A. muciniphila B and Spyradocola merdavium.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There is a positive monotonic association between the mean AUC score and taxonomic resolution for both RvsP and PFS12 (increasing from family to strain level) (Kendall P = 1.1 × 10 -11 for RvsP, P = 7.1 × 10 -15 for PFS12).
“When microbiome features were used, there was a positive monotonic association between the mean AUC score and taxonomic resolution for both endpoints (increasing from family to strain level) (Kendall P = 1.1 × 10 -11 for RvsP, P = 7.1 × 10 -15 for PFS12).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The predictiveness of signatures trained on CICB cohorts does not extend to anti-PD-1 monotherapy cohorts.
“Notably, we found that the predictiveness of signatures trained on CICB cohorts does not extend to anti-PD-1 monotherapy cohorts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Clinical factors failed to augment microbiome predictors.
“Consistent with their poor standalone performance, clinical factors failed to augment microbiome predictors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among the 23 pretreatment clinical and technical metadata tested, BOR group was the metadata variable explaining the most microbial variance.
“Indeed, among the 23 pretreatment clinical and technical metadata tested, BOR group was the metadata variable explaining the most microbial variance (Extended Data Fig. 1d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ A gut microbial signature for combination immune checkpoint blockade across cancer types
The percentage of patients with an objective response (CR or PR) was remarkably stable across histological cohorts (24-25%).
“Notably, the percentage of patients with an objective response (complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)) was remarkably stable across histological cohorts (24-25%) (Fig. 1b)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is a positive monotonic association between BOR and the fecal Shannon diversity index.
“Notably, we found a positive monotonic association between BOR and the fecal Shannon diversity index, a common alpha diversity metric (Fig. 1e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ A gut microbial signature for combination immune checkpoint blockade across cancer types
Strain-resolved microbial abundances improve machine learning predictions of ICB response and 12-month progression-free survival relative to models built using species-rank quantifications or comprehensive pretreatment clinical factors.
“We demonstrate that strain-resolved microbial abundances improve machine learning predictions of ICB response and 12-month progression-free survival relative to models built using species-rank quantifications or comprehensive pretreatment clinical factors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The baseline fecal microbiome composition is a relevant determinant of ICB response.
- Findingown data
There was a nonsignificant improvement in the OS of patients with SD with an above-median RvsP prediction (log-rank P = 0.17).
“Indeed, we found a nonsignificant improvement in the OS of patients with SD with an above-median RvsP prediction, although this analysis was likely underpowered (log-rank P = 0.17; Extended Data Fig. 2d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ A gut microbial signature for combination immune checkpoint blockade across cancer types
Progression-free survival was more consistent across histologies than overall survival.
“however, progression-free survival (PFS) was more consistent (Extended Data Fig. 1b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Predictive performance was better when training and testing on 'concordant' cohorts (same ICB regimen) rather than 'discordant' cohorts.
“Consistent with our previous observation, we found that the predictive performance was better when training and testing on 'concordant' cohorts-that is, when the training and test cohorts received the same ICB regimen-rather than 'discordant' cohorts (Fig. 4d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
CICB and anti-PD-1 gut microbial signatures have distinct performance.
“Lastly, the distinct performance of CICB and anti-PD-1 gut microbial signatures suggests that we should disaggregate these regimens in future analyses to define the relationships between gut microbiota and ICB more precisely in a regimen-specific fashion and, eventually, to use this information in personalizing the care of cancer patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
PFS stratified by BOR category has a log-rank test P = 2.1 × 10^-42.
“Kaplan-Meier curve of PFS stratified by BOR category (cPD n = 21, PD n = 30, SD n = 29, PR n = 22, CR n = 4).Log-rank test P = 2.1 × 10 -42 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The CA209-538 strain-response signature performed remarkably better in CICB melanoma cohorts (AUC = 0.67, 0.40, 0.78 and 0.75) than anti-PD-1 melanoma cohorts (AUC = 0.46, 0.44, 0.58 and 0.54) from other industrialized countries.
“its performance was remarkably better in CICB (AUC = 0.67, 0.40, 0.78 and 0.75) than anti-PD-1 (AUC = 0.46, 0.44, 0.58 and 0.54) melanoma cohorts from other industrialized countries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
OS stratified by BOR category has a log-rank test P = 1.2 × 10^-34.
“Kaplan-Meier curve of OS stratified by BOR category (cPD n = 21, PD n = 30, SD n = 29, PR n = 22, CR n = 4).Log-rank test P = 1.2 × 10 -34 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The top 22 strains are response predictive.
“Identification and metabolic-potential profiling of the top 22 response predictive strains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The acetyl-CoA butyrate pathway was complete in all (five of five) positive but no negative (none of two) top 22 Ruminococcaceae.
“Indeed, the acetyl-CoA butyrate pathway (which dominates among Firmicutes bacteria) was complete in all (five of five) positive but no negative (none of two) top 22 Ruminococacceae (Fig. 3b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The acetyl-CoA butyrate pathway completeness indicates butyrate production potential.
- Findingown data
Firmicutes bacteria dominate the gut microbiome strain-response signature.
“Firmicutes bacteria dominate the gut microbiome strain-response signature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was a significant improvement in the cross-study strain-RvsP predictive performance in concordant rather than discordant regimen cohorts (Mann-Whitney U test P = 2.8 × 10 -7).
“Taken together, the results showed a significant improvement in the cross-study strain-RvsP predictive performance in concordant rather than discordant regimen cohorts (Mann-Whitney U test P = 2.8 × 10 -7 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Strain-response signatures trained on external cohorts were superior when tested on concordant rather than discordant regimen cohorts.
“Consistent with this, strain-response signatures trained on external cohorts were also superior when tested on concordant rather than discordant regimen cohorts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is no association between the Shannon diversity index and clean paired-end reads in the discovery cohort (Pearson R = 0.068, P = 0.49).
“As we found no association between the Shannon diversity index and clean paired-end reads in our discovery cohort (Pearson R = 0.068, P = 0.49), we did not perform rarefaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Gut microbiome strain-response signatures are ICB regimen specific.
“Meta-analysis reveals that gut microbiome strain-response signatures are ICB regimen specific.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
This was also true for strain-RvsP signatures trained on anti-PD-1 monotherapy cohorts.
“Importantly, this was also true for strain-RvsP signatures trained on anti-PD-1 monotherapy cohorts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A strain-agnostic approach of quantifying the abundance of the acetyl-CoA butyrate terminal enzymes (but + buk) in metagenomic samples did not reveal a significant enrichment in responders.
“In contrast, taking a 'strain-agnostic' approach of quantifying the abundance of the acetyl-CoA butyrate terminal enzymes (but + buk) in metagenomic samples did not reveal a significant enrichment in responders (Fig. 3c)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Study site and DNA extraction kit were strongly associated with one another (chi-squared test P < 2.2 × 10 -16).
“However, these two factors were also strongly associated with one another (chi-squared test P < 2.2 × 10 -16 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study discovered a signature of 22 gut microbial strains associated with response to combination ipilimumab plus nivolumab in a phase 2 trial cohort of Australian patients with diverse rare cancers (n = 106).
“In this study, we used strain-resolved metagenomic classification to discover a signature of 22 gut microbial strains associated with response to combination ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) plus nivolumab (anti-PD-1) in a phase 2 trial cohort of Australian patients with diverse rare cancers (n = 106).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The leading sources of microbial variance across the meta-cohort were study site (city) (9.3%) and DNA extraction kit (8.0%).
“A PERMANOVA of individual metadata variables revealed that the leading sources of microbial variance across the meta-cohort were study site (city) (9.3%) and DNA extraction kit (8.0%) (Extended Data Fig. 4b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Baseline gut microbial compositions are heterogeneous across meta-analysis cohorts.
“Heterogeneity of baseline gut microbial compositions across meta-analysis cohorts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Previous meta-analyses across metagenomic studies have found limited reproducibility of candidate microbial biomarkers for ICB response.
“Unfortunately, previous meta-analyses across metagenomic studies have found limited reproducibility of these candidate microbial biomarkers for ICB response [17][18][19][20] .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17][18][19][20]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Microbial abundances, especially at strain-level resolution, are more valuable in predicting tumor response or landmark PFS than higher taxonomic aggregations or clinical features.
“Overall, these data suggest that microbial abundances, especially at strain-level resolution, are more valuable in predicting tumor response or landmark PFS than higher taxonomic aggregations or clinical features.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Associations between alpha diversity and cancer patient outcomes may be treatment regimen specific.
“Associations between alpha diversity and cancer patient outcomes have been found in the setting of patients receiving hematopoietic cell transplant 29 or cervical cancer chemoradiation 30 but not in anti-PD-1 recipients with metastatic melanoma 16,18 ; thus, such associations may be treatment regimen specific.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [29] Peled, J. U. et al. Microbiota as predictor of mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 822–834 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [30] Sims, T. T. et al. Gut microbiome diversity is an independent predictor of survival in cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiation. Commun. Biol. 4, 237 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Spencer, C. N. et al. Dietary fiber and probiotics influence the gut microbiome and melanoma immunotherapy response. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz7015 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Lee, K. A. et al. Cross-cohort gut microbiome associations with immune checkpoint inhibitor response in advanced melanoma. Nat. Med. 28, 535–544 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
In the CA209-538 cohort, patients with rapid progression had the most distinct gross baseline microbial compositions.
“indicating that, in our cohort, patients with rapid progression had the most distinct gross baseline microbial compositions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Clinical factors are more prognostic markers than predictors of antitumor activity.
“inferring that these are more prognostic markers than predictors of antitumor activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ A gut microbial signature for combination immune checkpoint blockade across cancer types
No major clinical differences were observed between microbiome-evaluable patients and those who were not sampled.
“No major clinical differences were observed between microbiome-evaluable patients and those who were not sampled (Supplementary Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Low blood albumin and high NLR are more useful for delineating patients with the worst prognosis rather than distinguishing responders and nonresponders.
“This was despite the previously observed relationship between low blood albumin, high NLR and cPD, suggesting that these factors are more useful for delineating patients with the worst prognosis rather than distinguishing responders and nonresponders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Different microbiota-host relationships are relevant to distinct ICB regimens.
“This suggests that, although tumor agnostic, different microbiota-host relationships are relevant to distinct ICB regimens.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The baseline fecal microbiome composition is a relevant determinant of ICB response.
- Premisecitation
Random forest (RF) has, on average, superior performance using microbial feature sets in previous benchmarking studies.
“We chose to use RF as our classifier, given its, on average, superior performance using microbial feature sets in previous benchmarking studies 31 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Pasolli, E., Truong, D. T., Malik, F., Waldron, L. & Segata, N. Machine learning meta-analysis of large metagenomic datasets: tools and biological insights. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004977 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The external performance of the CA209-538 strain-response signature fell short of what is required for clinical use.
“Although the external performance of the CA209-538 strainresponse signature fell short of what is required for clinical use”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Closely related taxa can have discordant relationships with host phenotypes.
“The juxtaposition of Bifidobacterium longum 1 and B. dentium 1 as positive and negative, respectively, also highlights how closely related taxa can have discordant relationships with host phenotypes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Strain resolution has added value in developing gut microbial ICB biomarkers.
“First, it highlights the added value of strain resolution in developing gut microbial ICB biomarkers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Strain signatures may be generalizable across cancer types and geographic locations.
“Second, it suggests that strain signatures may be generalizable across cancer types and geographic locations, supporting investment in developing 'pan-cancer' gut microbial diagnostics and/or therapeutic ICB adjuncts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This work makes a strong case for distinct microbial consortia underpinning response or nonresponse to each regimen.
“Thus, we believe that this work makes a strong case for distinct microbial consortia underpinning response or nonresponse to each regimen.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The baseline fecal microbiome composition is a relevant determinant of ICB response.
- Interpretationown data
Precise, strain-level gut microbial quantifications provide value in predicting clinical response or PFS12, exceeding the value of routinely available clinical information or that of higher taxonomic rank abundances.
“Using supervised ML, we demonstrate the value that precise, strain-level gut microbial quantifications provide in predicting clinical response or PFS12, exceeding the value of routinely available clinical information or that of higher taxonomic rank abundances.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The baseline fecal microbiome composition is a relevant determinant of ICB response.
- Premisecitation
Intraspecies variation of gut microbiota can substantially change their effect on hosts.
“There is now ample evidence that intraspecies variation of gut microbiota can substantially change their effect on hosts, first described for enteric pathogens (for example, Escherichia coli 56 ) but more recently demonstrated for immunomodulatory commensals 57,58 , providing further conceptual support for this notion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [56] Figler, H. M. & Dudley, E. G. The interplay of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and commensal E. coli: the importance of strain-level identification. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 10, 415–417 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [57] Yang, C. et al. Fecal IgA levels are determined by strain-level differences in Bacteroides ovatus and are modifiable by gut microbiota manipulation. Cell Host Microbe 27, 467–475.e6 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [58] Geva-Zatorsky, N. et al. Mining the human gut microbiota for immunomodulatory organisms. Cell 168, 928–943 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Different microbial relationships likely underlie distinct treatment regimens (CICB vs anti-PD-1 monotherapy).
“Finally, we observed a striking difference in the cross-study performance of response classifiers trained and tested on concordant versus discordant ICB cohorts, implying that different microbial relationships likely underlie these distinct treatment regimens.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The baseline fecal microbiome composition is a relevant determinant of ICB response.
- Study design and conductown data
The individual cohort and total sample sizes in this study are still small, limiting the statistical power of the gut microbial signature.
“First, despite our relatively large discovery cohort and meta-analysis, the individual cohort and total sample sizes are still small, limiting the statistical power of our signature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 24
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 27
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost of the 15 negative strains were Firmicutes, with 6, 3 and 2 (of the 15) strains belonging to the Lachnospiraceae, Oscillospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae families, respectively.
“As before, most were Firmicutes, with 6, 3 and 2 (of the 15) strains belonging to the Lachnospiraceae, Oscillospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae families, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ A gut microbial signature for combination immune checkpoint blockade across cancer typesOverall survival significantly differed by histology in the CA209-538 cohort.
“As expected, overall survival (OS) significantly differed by histology (Extended Data Fig. 1a)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe most 'beneficial' strains (higher strain abundances shifted predictions toward 'response') clustered in one clade of the Ruminococcaceae family, with four being strains within the Faecalibacterium genus.
“The most 'beneficial' strains (that is, higher strain abundances shifted predictions toward 'response') clustered in one clade of the Ruminococcaceae family, with four being strains within the Faecalibacterium genus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 22 top strains identified by SHAP are biologically meaningful and not artifacts of the model.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataEight of the negative strains belonged to thus far uncultivated (and thus unnamed) species.
“Notably, eight of these strains belonged to thus far uncultivated (and thus unnamed) species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStrain-resolved abundances provided the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.73 for RvsP, AUC = 0.70 for PFS12), significantly outperforming species-level abundances.
“In particular, strain-resolved abundances provided the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.73 for RvsP, AUC = 0.70 for PFS12), significantly outperforming the more common species-level abundances.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwenty of the 22 top strains were gram positives, with most (18 of 20) belonging to the Firmicutes (Bacillota) phylum.
“This demonstrated that 20 of the 22 strains were gram positives, with most (18 of 20) belonging to the Firmicutes (Bacillota) phylum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt the 98% genomic identity threshold, the custom strain reference library included n = 35 distinct Faecalibacterium strains (from n = 13 distinct species), with the most important (and prevalent) clustering near the F. prausnitzii D phylogenetic clade.
“In keeping with this, at the 98% genomic identity threshold, our custom strain reference library included n = 35 distinct Faecalibacterium strains (from n = 13 distinct species), with the most important (and prevalent) clustering near the F. prausnitzii D phylogenetic clade (Supplementary Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDespite being trained on binary RvsP, the predicted probabilities of patients were correctly ranked by their actual BOR category (Kendall P < 2.2 × 10 -16), including central predictions for the SD group that were 'unseen' during model training (n = 29).
“Notably, despite being trained on binary RvsP, the predicted probabilities of patients were correctly ranked by their actual BOR category (Kendall P < 2.2 × 10 -16 ), including (on average) central predictions for the SD group that were 'unseen' during model training (n = 29) (Extended Data Fig. 2c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ A gut microbial signature for combination immune checkpoint blockade across cancer typesPatients with rapid clinical progression (cPD) had significantly lower albumin and higher NLR.
“This was particularly driven by patients with rapid clinical progression (clinical PD (cPD)) having significantly lower albumin and higher NLR”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStrain-level response signatures show external generalizability across cancer histology types and countries, both within the trial and externally to metastatic melanoma cohorts from other industrialized countries.
“Furthermore, we show the external generalizability of strain-level response signatures across cancer histology types and countries, both within the trial (comparing across the predetermined histology cohorts) and externally (to metastatic melanoma cohorts from other industrialized countries).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningSix studies could be included in the meta-analysis.
“Finally, of the remaining ten studies, four were excluded as they did not report response, yielding six studies that could be included in our meta-analysis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the 28 unique studies, 19 used shotgun metagenomics, and 13 made raw data available.
“Of these, 19 studies used shotgun metagenomics, and 13 studies made these raw data available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong the top 22 strains, some have positive and some negative associations with response.
“Top 22 strains coloured (blue and red for positive and negative associations with response, respectively), with importance threshold depicted (red dashed line).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe top 22 strains harbored no virulence factors, suggesting that even the negative strains are not prototypical 'pathogens'.
“We first evaluated them for virulence factors and found that they harbored none, suggesting that even the negative strains are not prototypical 'pathogens'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 22 top strains identified by SHAP are biologically meaningful and not artifacts of the model.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA total of 28 unique studies met eligibility criterion 1.
“Titles and abstracts were manually reviewed to identify a total of 28 unique studies meeting eligibility criterion 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was a marked difference in the performance of the CA209-538 strain-RvsP signature between CICB and anti-PD-1 cohorts, with overall modest external generalizability to CICB cohorts (mean AUC = 0.65) but no generalizability to anti-PD-1 cohorts (mean AUC = 0.51).
“Notably, there was a marked difference in the performance of the CA209-538 strain-RvsP signature between these groups, with overall modest external generalizability to CICB cohorts (mean AUC = 0.65; Fig. 4b) but no generalizability to anti-PD-1 cohorts (mean AUC = 0.51; Fig. 4c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataDespite a wide range in the number of quality-controlled paired-end reads per sample, in general, all were deeply sequenced.
“Despite a wide range in the number of quality-controlled paired-end reads per sample, in general, all were deeply sequenced (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe PubMed search yielded 1,181 records up to December 31, 2022.
“In total, this search yielded 1,181 records up to December 31, 2022.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStrain-resolution gut microbial signatures outperform clinical predictors and cross-validate across tumor histology types.
“Fig. 2 | Fig. 2 | Strain-resolution gut microbial signatures outperform clinical predictors and cross-validate across tumor histology types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere are clinical and gut microbiome compositional differences between responders and nonresponders.
“Fig. 1 | Fig. 1 | Clinical and gut microbiome compositional differences between responders and nonresponders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationResponses to CICB are unpredictable, seen in only 20-60% of patients across cancer indications.
“However, this success is tempered by the unpredictable nature of responses (seen in only 20-60% of patients across these cancer indications 7 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Morad, G., Helmink, B. A., Sharma, P. & Wargo, J. A. Hallmarks of response, resistance, and toxicity to immune checkpoint blockade. Cell 184, 5309–5337 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe Bowtie 2 alignment rates to the tailored strain reference library were high (median 88.4%), with a median of 10.2 million mapped paired-end reads (50%) passing stringent quality control.
“The Bowtie 2 alignment rates to our tailored strain reference library were high (median 88.4%), with a median of 10.2 million mapped paired-end reads (50%) passing stringent quality control and used for precise strain quantification (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Methods).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A gut microbial signature for combination immune checkpoint blockade across cancer typesAlbumin and NLR are responses to inflammation shown to be strongly prognostic across cancer types and treatment settings.
“both responses to inflammation shown to be strongly prognostic across cancer types and treatment settings 27,28 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [27] Gupta, D. & Lis, C. G. Pretreatment serum albumin as a predictor of cancer survival: a systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Nutr. J. 9, 69 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [28] Cupp, M. A. et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and cancer prognosis: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. BMC Med. 18, 360 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA. muciniphila B is a distinct species from A. muciniphila.
“It should be noted that A. muciniphila B is a distinct species from A. muciniphila; although the latter was positively implicated in anti-PD-1 efficacy in NSCLC 13 (also positive in our study but not within the top 22 strains), recent analyses have revealed that it is phylogenetically and phenotypically distinct from A. muciniphila B (known as Akkermansia SGB9228 by MetaPhlAn4 taxonomy) 21 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] Derosa, L. et al. Intestinal Akkermansia muciniphila predicts clinical response to PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat. Med. 28, 315–324 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Karcher, N. et al. Genomic diversity and ecology of human-associated Akkermansia species in the gut microbiome revealed by extensive metagenomic assembly. Genome Biol. 22, 209 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCurrently approved tumor-agnostic biomarkers for PD-1 blockade include tumor mutational burden and mismatch repair deficiency.
“Currently approved tumor-agnostic biomarkers for PD-1 blockade include tumor mutational burden and mismatch repair deficiency 9”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Wang, Y. et al. FDA-approved and emerging next generation predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients. Front. Oncol. 11, 683419 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataStrain-level gut microbial predictors of CICB response may be relatively robust across diverse cancer types and are superior to ML predictors built using routine clinically available data.
“Our ML analysis of our discovery cohort demonstrates that strain-level gut microbial predictors of CICB response may be relatively robust across diverse cancer types and are superior to ML predictors built using routine clinically available data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSevere immune-related adverse effects are more frequent with CICB when compared to anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monotherapy.
“and the more frequent severe immune-related adverse effects experienced with CICB when compared to anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monotherapy 8 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] de Ávila Machado, M. A. et al. Real-world analyses of therapy discontinuation of checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic melanoma patients. Sci. Rep. 10, 14607 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataPredictions trained on binary RvsP appear to capture the RECIST BOR biologically and may have utility for predicting the durability of SD.
“Furthermore, predictions trained on binary RvsP appear to capture the RECIST BOR biologically and may have utility for predicting the durability of SD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudies of clinical cohorts have found associations between baseline Akkermansia muciniphila (lung cancer) and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (melanoma) fecal abundances and tumor responses among anti-PD-1 recipients.
“with studies of clinical cohorts finding associations between baseline Akkermansia muciniphila (lung cancer) [10][11][12][13] and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (melanoma) [14][15][16] fecal abundances and tumor responses among anti-PD-1 recipients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10][11][12][13]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14][15][16]
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ A gut microbial signature for combination immune checkpoint blockade across cancer typesCombination ICB targeting both PD-1 and CTLA-4 has demonstrated synergistic antitumor activity preclinically.
“Combination ICB (CICB) targeting both PD-1 and CTLA-4 has demonstrated synergistic antitumor activity preclinically 1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Curran, M. A., Montalvo, W., Yagita, H. & Allison, J. P. PD-1 and CTLA-4 combination blockade expands infiltrating T cells and reduces regulatory T and myeloid cells within B16 melanoma tumors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 4275–4280 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe supervised ML pipeline's training and testing procedures were repeated 100 times, and predictions were averaged to account for stochasticity.
“Whenever evaluating model performance, training and testing procedures were repeated 100 times, and the resultant predictions were averaged to account for the stochasticity of our RF pipeline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataOne strain was identified as a potential contaminant in over 10% of samples from the discovery cohort and was removed.
“Based on the 'frequency' method (inverse correlation between the abundance of strains and the DNA concentration of submitted samples), one strain was identified as a potential contaminant in over 10% of samples from our discovery cohort (CA209-538 cohort) and was thus removed (Pseudomonas E sp002874965; Supplementary Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOMR-200 kits are designed to stabilize DNA and have been shown to enhance DNA quantifications and stability across storage temperatures relative to nonpreservative alternatives.
“OMR-200 kits are designed to stabilize DNA and have been shown to enhance DNA quantifications and stability across storage temperatures relative to nonpreservative alternatives 64 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Maghini, D. G. et al. Quantifying bias introduced by sample collection in relative and absolute microbiome measurements. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01754-3 (2023). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataNo bacteria were identified in the negative control sample for the discovery cohort.
“Reassuringly, after the above steps, no bacteria were identified in our negative control sample for the discovery cohort.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFeature importance computation was repeated 1,000 times to robustly account for the RF pipeline's stochasticity.
“We repeated this procedure 1,000 times to account robustly for the RF pipeline's stochasticity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe addition of anti-CTLA-4 has a profound effect on gut barrier permeability, potentially changing the influence of the gut microbiome on ICB response.
“Furthermore, the addition of anti-CTLA-4 has a profound effect on gut barrier permeability 50,51 , potentially changing the influence of the gut microbiome on ICB response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [50] Coutzac, C. et al. Systemic short chain fatty acids limit antitumor effect of CTLA-4 blockade in hosts with cancer. Nat. Commun. 11, 2168 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [51] Mager, L. F. et al. Microbiome-derived inosine modulates response to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. Science 369, 1481–1489 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningPatient-specific culturing is necessary to perform in vitro and in vivo testing of microbial strains or consortia to derive precise mechanistic insights into their associations with response or nonresponse to ICB and to confirm the direction of causality.
“Finally, such patient-specific culturing is necessary to perform in vitro and in vivo testing of microbial strains or consortia to derive precise mechanistic insights into their associations with response or nonresponse to ICB and to confirm the direction of causality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere are more discrepancies in the pretreatment tumor immunotranscriptomic landscape of anti-PD-1 and CICB nonresponders compared to responders.
“This is also conceptually consistent with the observation of more discrepancies in the pretreatment tumor immunotranscriptomic landscape of anti-PD-1 and CICB nonresponders compared to responders 49 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] Gide, T. N. et al. Distinct immune cell populations define response to anti-PD-1 monotherapy and anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 combined therapy. Cancer Cell 35, 238–255 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataStrain-aware approaches are needed to develop context-specific functional hypotheses.
“highlighting the need for strain-aware approaches to develop context-specific functional hypotheses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The acetyl-CoA butyrate pathway completeness indicates butyrate production potential.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe MAGs generated in this study potentially harbor errors such as fragmentation, assembly breaks and contamination.
“Moreover, although we used a state-of-the-art bioinformatics pipeline to generate and quality control MAGs to represent study-specific strains (many of which are new or uncultivated), they still potentially harbor errors (such as fragmentation, assembly breaks and contamination) 53 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] Chen, L.-X., Anantharaman, K., Shaiber, A., Eren, A. M. & Banfield, J. F. Accurate and complete genomes from metagenomes. Genome Res. 30, 315–333 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPseudoprogression occurs in a minority of ICB recipients.
“Given the accumulating evidence of 'pseudoprogression' in a minority of ICB recipients 62”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] Park, H. J. et al. Incidence of pseudoprogression during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 297, 87–96 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCLR abundances may better account for the inherent compositionality of microbial abundance data.
“As CLR abundances may better account for the inherent compositionality of microbial abundance data 89 , CLR-transformed feature abundances were exclusively used for the supervised ML analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89] Gloor, G. B., Macklaim, J. M., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. & Egozcue, J. J. Microbiome datasets are compositional: and this is not optional. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2224 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnti-CTLA-4 appears to modify gut barrier integrity and could feasibly change microbial compositions.
“for example, anti-CTLA-4 appears to modify gut barrier integrity 51 and thus could feasibly change microbial compositions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Mager, L. F. et al. Microbiome-derived inosine modulates response to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. Science 369, 1481–1489 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCICB has a distinct mechanism of action compared to anti-PD-1 monotherapy.
“This is biologically plausible, given that we know that CICB has a distinct mechanism of action compared to anti-PD-1 monotherapy 48 and distinct baseline tumor immune microenvironment signatures 49 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [48] Wei, S. C. et al. Combination anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade utilizes cellular mechanisms partially distinct from monotherapies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 22699–22709 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [49] Gide, T. N. et al. Distinct immune cell populations define response to anti-PD-1 monotherapy and anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 combined therapy. Cancer Cell 35, 238–255 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
The baseline fecal microbiome composition is a relevant determinant of ICB response.
“A promising 'tumor-extrinsic' avenue for predicting ICB response and/or toxicity a priori is assessing a patient's baseline gut microbiome composition”
“This suggests that future development of gut microbiome diagnostics or therapeutics should be tailored according to ICB treatment regimen rather than according to cancer type.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 22 top strains identified by SHAP are biologically meaningful and not artifacts of the model.
“Twenty-two strains were within half as impactful as the most important strain (a strain of Faecalibacterium sp900539885, an uncultured species), which we opted to focus on subsequently.”
“We next aimed to interrogate the genomes of the top 22 strains to understand functional potentials that may underpin their strong (positive and negative) response associations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The acetyl-CoA butyrate pathway completeness indicates butyrate production potential.
“Indeed, the acetyl-CoA butyrate pathway (which dominates among Firmicutes bacteria) was complete in all (five of five) positive but no negative (none of two) top 22 Ruminococacceae (Fig. 3b).”
“One metabolite of particular interest was butyrate, given that it has been implicated in anticancer cytotoxic T cell activation preclinically [39][40][41] , and fecal butyrate has been positively associated with ICB efficacy in clinical cohorts 42,43 .”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deep shotgun metagenomics in 2 cohorts of rare cancers confirmed cross-cancer validity of strain-response signatures dependent on ICI treatment rather than cancer type.
“Another study performed deep shotgun metagenomics sequencing in 2 cohorts of patients with diverse rare cancers treated with combination ICI.16 Comforted by a meta-analysis of gut metagenomes from 6 additional comparable studies, they confirmed the cross-cancer (and cross-country) validity of strain – response signatures which were dependent on the ICI treatment rather than on the cancer type.16”
From <i>Faecalibacterium prausnitzii</i> strain EXL01 boosts efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
No single microbial species can reliably predict treatment response across all contexts, suggesting a complex interplay among microbiome-immunotherapy interactions.
“Indeed, multiple studies have highlighted that no single microbial species can reliably predict treatment response across all contexts, suggesting a complex interplay among microbiome–immunotherapy interactions (Gunjur et al., 2024; Lee et al., 2022).”
From Microbiota-centered interventions to boost immune checkpoint blockade therapies (2025) · cites this paper as Gunjur et al., 2024
Challenges remain regarding the reproducibility and generalizability of microbiome-derived signatures across patient cohorts and immunotherapy regimens.
“Although ML algorithms have improved the predictive accuracy of treatment outcomes, challenges remain regarding the reproducibility and generalizability of microbiome-derived signatures across patient cohorts and immunotherapy regimens (Gunjur et al., 2024; Lee et al., 2022).”
From Microbiota-centered interventions to boost immune checkpoint blockade therapies (2025) · cites this paper as Gunjur et al., 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Extended Data Figure 1a is assigned two different survival outcomes
MinorThe figure caption calls panel 1a a progression-free-survival curve, while the results assign overall survival to panel 1a and progression-free survival to panel 1b.
“a, Kaplan-Meier curve of progression-free survival stratified by histology (UGB n = 38, NEN n = 32, GYN n = 36).”
“As expected, overall survival (OS) significantly differed by histology (Extended Data Fig. 1a); however, progression-free survival (PFS) was more consistent (Extended Data Fig. 1b).”
NovaSeq read length differs between methods and Table 2
MinorThe sequencing methods describe 150-base paired-end reads, whereas Table 2 lists the CA209-538 NovaSeq reads as 151 bases per read.
“whole metagenome libraries were deeply sequenced on a single run of the NovaSeq 6000 S4 platform (2 × 150-bp paired-end reads)”
“Sequencer (bases per read) NovaSeq (2 × 151)”
Figure 3 undercounts archaeal genomes
MinorThe methods identify six known archaeal species clusters plus two additional archaeal genomes, implying at least eight archaeal genomes in the reference library. Figure 3 says it excludes only six archaea from that library.
“Phylogenetic tree of bacterial strains in our custom reference library (n = 1,391 strains, excluding n = 6 archaea)”
“we could classify 1,363 of the 1,397 genomes to 904 separate GTDB r207 species clusters (898 bacteria, 6 archaea), with the remaining 34 (32 bacteria, 2 archaea) representing completely new species.”
Cites
The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools
Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., Durbin, R., & 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · Cited by 62,041 · see citing works
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607 · see citing works
Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2
Langmead, B., & Salzberg, S. L. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1923 · Cited by 56,400 · see citing works
Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment
Hunter, J. D. (2007) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 · Cited by 39,249 · see citing works
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534 · see citing works
SPAdes: A New Genome Assembly Algorithm and Its Applications to Single-Cell Sequencing
Bankevich, A., Nurk, S., Antipov, D., Gurevich, A. A., Dvorkin, M. V., Kulikov, A. S., Lesin, V. M., Nikolenko, S., Pham, S., Prjibelski, A. D., et al. (2012) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 · Cited by 25,691 · see citing works
Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 · Cited by 23,826 · see citing works
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., et al. (2019) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.01686 · Cited by 22,138 · see citing works
phyloseq: An R Package for Reproducible Interactive Analysis and Graphics of Microbiome Census Data
McMurdie, P. J., & Holmes, S. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 · Cited by 21,013 · see citing works
FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S., & Arkin, A. P. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 · Cited by 14,894 · see citing works
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P., & Tyson, G. W. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.186072.114 · Cited by 12,496 · see citing works
From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees
Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G., Chen, H., DeGrave, A., Prutkin, J. M., Nair, B., Katz, R., Himmelfarb, J., Bansal, N., & Lee, S.-I. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 · Cited by 10,551 · see citing works
Li, D., Liu, C.-M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K., & Lam, T. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033 · Cited by 9,781 · see citing works
High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries
Jain, C., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Phillippy, A. M., Konstantinidis, K. T., & Aluru, S. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9 · Cited by 5,748 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For the tree of Faecalibacterium genomes, pairwise whole-genome ANI distances were computed using FastANI 82 (many-to-many mode), which was converted into a distance matrix and then to a Newick-format tree using rapidNJ (v2.”
Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors
Routy, B., Le Chatelier, E., Derosa, L., Duong, C. P. M., Alou, M. T., Daillère, R., Fluckiger, A., Messaoudene, M., Rauber, C., Roberti, M. P., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan3706 · Cited by 5,671 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…16S rRNA gene sequencing to high-resolution shotgun metagenomics, with studies of clinical cohorts finding associations between baseline Akkermansia muciniphila (lung cancer) 10–13 and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (melanoma) 14–16 fecal abundances and tumor responses among anti-PD-1 recipients.”
Overall Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma
Wolchok, J. D., Chiarion-Sileni, V., Gonzalez, R., Rutkowski, P., Grob, J.-J., Cowey, C. L., Lao, C. D., Wagstaff, J., Schadendorf, D., Ferrucci, P. F., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1709684 · Cited by 5,357 · see citing works
Self-citationYu, G., Smith, D. K., Zhu, H., Guan, Y., & Lam, T. T. (2016) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12628 · Cited by 4,860 · see citing works
Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma
Motzer, R. J., Tannir, N. M., McDermott, D. F., Arén Frontera, O., Melichar, B., Choueiri, T. K., Plimack, E. R., Barthélémy, P., Porta, C., George, S., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1712126 · Cited by 4,656 · see citing works
metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler
Nurk, S., Meleshko, D., Korobeynikov, A., & Pevzner, P. A. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.213959.116 · Cited by 4,496 · see citing works
Kang, D., Li, F., Kirton, E., Thomas, A., Egan, R. S., An, H., & Wang, Z. (2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.7359 · Cited by 3,784 · see citing works
Davis, N. M., Proctor, D. M., Holmes, S. P., Relman, D. A., & Callahan, B. J. (2018) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0605-2 · Cited by 3,493 · see citing works
The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients
Matson, V., Fessler, J., Bao, R., Chongsuwat, T., Zha, Y., Alegre, M.-L., Luke, J. J., & Gajewski, T. F. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao3290 · Cited by 3,107 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Indeed, while the species B. longum has been linked to positive health outcomes, such as protection from inflammatory bowel disease 35 , protection from childhood malnutrition 36 , and anti-PD-1 responses 37 , B. dentium is a known oral opportunistic pathogen linked to tooth decay 38 .”
Microbiome Datasets Are Compositional: And This Is Not Optional
Gloor, G. B., Macklaim, J. M., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., & Egozcue, J. J. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02224 · Cited by 3,044 · see citing works
Olm, M. R., Brown, C. T., Brooks, B., & Banfield, J. F. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2017.126 · Cited by 3,031 · see citing works
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Hellmann, M. D., Paz-Ares, L., Bernabe Caro, R., Zurawski, B., Kim, S.-W., Carcereny Costa, E., Park, K., Alexandru, A., Lupinacci, L., de la Mora Jimenez, E., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1910231 · Cited by 2,823 · see citing works
MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets
Wu, Y., Simmons, B. A., & Singer, S. W. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv638 · Cited by 2,809 · see citing works
Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition
Alneberg, J., Bjarnason, B. S., de Bruijn, I., Schirmer, M., Quick, J., Ijaz, U. Z., Lahti, L., Loman, N. J., Andersson, A. F., & Quince, C. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3103 · Cited by 2,707 · see citing works
MetaWRAP—a flexible pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic data analysis
Uritskiy, G. V., DiRuggiero, J., & Taylor, J. (2018) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0541-1 · Cited by 2,642 · see citing works
The Genome Standards Consortium, Bowers, R. M., Kyrpides, N. C., Stepanauskas, R., Harmon-Smith, M., Doud, D., Reddy, T. B. K., Schulz, F., Jarett, J., Rivers, A. R., et al. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3893 · Cited by 2,624 · see citing works
GTDB-Tk v2: memory friendly classification with the genome taxonomy database
Chaumeil, P.-A., Mussig, A. J., Hugenholtz, P., & Parks, D. H. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac672 · Cited by 2,106 · see citing works
Curran, M. A., Montalvo, W., Yagita, H., & Allison, J. P. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0915174107 · Cited by 1,874 · see citing works
Chklovski, A., Parks, D. H., Woodcroft, B. J., & Tyson, G. W. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-023-01940-w · Cited by 1,705 · see citing works
VFDB 2016: hierarchical and refined dataset for big data analysis—10 years on
Chen, L., Zheng, D., Liu, B., Yang, J., & Jin, Q. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1239 · Cited by 1,672 · see citing works
Hallmarks of response, resistance, and toxicity to immune checkpoint blockade
Morad, G., Helmink, B. A., Sharma, P., & Wargo, J. A. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.020 · Cited by 1,648 · see citing works
Gupta, D., & Lis, C. G. (2010) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2891-9-69 · Cited by 1,485 · see citing works
Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models
Zou, K. H., O’Malley, A. J., & Mauri, L. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.594929 · Cited by 1,473 · see citing works
Microbiome-derived inosine modulates response to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy
Mager, L. F., Burkhard, R., Pett, N., Cooke, N. C. A., Brown, K., Ramay, H., Paik, S., Stagg, J., Groves, R. A., Gallo, M., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abc3421 · Cited by 1,407 · see citing works
Culturing of ‘unculturable’ human microbiota reveals novel taxa and extensive sporulation
Browne, H. P., Forster, S. C., Anonye, B. O., Kumar, N., Neville, B. A., Stares, M. D., Goulding, D., & Lawley, T. D. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17645 · Cited by 1,299 · see citing works
Self-citationYau, T., Kang, Y.-K., Kim, T.-Y., El-Khoueiry, A. B., Santoro, A., Sangro, B., Melero, I., Kudo, M., Hou, M.-M., Matilla, A., et al. (2020) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.4564 · Cited by 1,273 · see citing works
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and human intestinal health
Miquel, S., Martín, R., Rossi, O., Bermúdez‐Humarán, L. G., Chatel, J., Sokol, H., Thomas, M., Wells, J. M., & Langella, P. (2013) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2013.06.003 · Cited by 1,239 · see citing works
Baas, P., Scherpereel, A., Nowak, A. K., Fujimoto, N., Peters, S., Tsao, A. S., Mansfield, A. S., Popat, S., Jahan, T., Antonia, S., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32714-8 · Cited by 1,215 · see citing works
Gide, T. N., Quek, C., Menzies, A. M., Tasker, A. T., Shang, P., Holst, J., Madore, J., Lim, S. Y., Velickovic, R., Wongchenko, M., et al. (2019) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2019.01.003 · Cited by 1,047 · see citing works
Self-citationMatsen, F. A., IV, Kodner, R. B., & Armbrust, E. V. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-538 · Cited by 1,026 · see citing works
Dietary fiber and probiotics influence the gut microbiome and melanoma immunotherapy response
Spencer, C. N., McQuade, J. L., Gopalakrishnan, V., McCulloch, J. A., Vetizou, M., Cogdill, A. P., Khan, M. A. W., Zhang, X., White, M. G., Peterson, C. B., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz7015 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Regional variation limits applications of healthy gut microbiome reference ranges and disease models
He, Y., Wu, W., Zheng, H.-M., Li, P., McDonald, D., Sheng, H.-F., Chen, M.-X., Chen, Z.-H., Ji, G.-Y., Zheng, Z.-D.-X., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0164-x · Cited by 894 · see citing works
Towards standards for human fecal sample processing in metagenomic studies
Costea, P. I., Zeller, G., Sunagawa, S., Pelletier, E., Alberti, A., Levenez, F., Tramontano, M., Driessen, M., Hercog, R., Jung, F.-E., et al. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3960 · Cited by 893 · see citing works
Recovery of gut microbiota of healthy adults following antibiotic exposure
Palleja, A., Mikkelsen, K. H., Forslund, S. K., Kashani, A., Allin, K. H., Nielsen, T., Hansen, T. H., Liang, S., Feng, Q., Zhang, C., et al. (2018) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-018-0257-9 · Cited by 875 · see citing works
Microbiota as Predictor of Mortality in Allogeneic Hematopoietic-Cell Transplantation
Peled, J. U., Gomes, A. L. C., Devlin, S. M., Littmann, E. R., Taur, Y., Sung, A. D., Weber, D., Hashimoto, D., Slingerland, A. E., Slingerland, J. B., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1900623 · Cited by 765 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Associations between alpha diversity and cancer patient outcomes have been found in the setting of patients receiving hematopoietic cell transplant 29 or cervical cancer chemoradiation 30 but not in anti-PD-1 recipients with metastatic melanoma 16,18 ; thus, such associations may be treatment…”
Mining the Human Gut Microbiota for Immunomodulatory Organisms
Geva-Zatorsky, N., Sefik, E., Kua, L., Pasman, L., Tan, T. G., Ortiz-Lopez, A., Yanortsang, T. B., Yang, L., Jupp, R., Mathis, D., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.022 · Cited by 762 · see citing works
Duncan, S. H., Hold, G. L., Harmsen, H. J. M., Stewart, C. S., & Flint, H. J. (2002) · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY · doi:10.1099/00207713-52-6-2141 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
He, Y., Fu, L., Li, Y., Wang, W., Gong, M., Zhang, J., Dong, X., Huang, J., Wang, Q., Mackay, C. R., et al. (2021) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2021.03.002 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
Frankel, A. E., Coughlin, L. A., Kim, J., Froehlich, T. W., Xie, Y., Frenkel, E. P., & Koh, A. Y. (2017) · Neoplasia · doi:10.1016/j.neo.2017.08.004 · Cited by 709 · see citing works
Bachem, A., Makhlouf, C., Binger, K. J., de Souza, D. P., Tull, D., Hochheiser, K., Whitney, P. G., Fernandez-Ruiz, D., Dähling, S., Kastenmüller, W., et al. (2019) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2019.06.002 · Cited by 702 · see citing works
Cupp, M. A., Cariolou, M., Tzoulaki, I., Aune, D., Evangelou, E., & Berlanga-Taylor, A. J. (2020) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01817-1 · Cited by 697 · see citing works
Derosa, L., Routy, B., Thomas, A. M., Iebba, V., Zalcman, G., Friard, S., Mazieres, J., Audigier-Valette, C., Moro-Sibilot, D., Goldwasser, F., et al. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01655-5 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Machine Learning Meta-analysis of Large Metagenomic Datasets: Tools and Biological Insights
Pasolli, E., Truong, D. T., Malik, F., Waldron, L., & Segata, N. (2016) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004977 · Cited by 659 · see citing works
Jin, Y., Dong, H., Xia, L., Yang, Y., Zhu, Y., Shen, Y., Zheng, H., Yao, C., Wang, Y., & Lu, S. (2019) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2019.04.007 · Cited by 573 · cited 4× · see citing works
“As a (NSCLC) 4 , mesothelioma 5 and hepatocellular carcinoma 6 .”
InfluentialA human gut bacterial genome and culture collection for improved metagenomic analyses
Forster, S. C., Kumar, N., Anonye, B. O., Almeida, A., Viciani, E., Stares, M., Dunn, M., Mkandawire, T. T., Zhu, A., Shao, Y., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-018-0009-7 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
Self-citationZheng, Y., Wang, T., Tu, X., Huang, Y., Zhang, H., Tan, D., Jiang, W., Cai, S., Zhao, P., Song, R., et al. (2019) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1186/s40425-019-0650-9 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Olm, M. R., Crits-Christoph, A., Bouma-Gregson, K., Firek, B. A., Morowitz, M. J., & Banfield, J. F. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-00797-0 · Cited by 537 · see citing works
Systemic short chain fatty acids limit antitumor effect of CTLA-4 blockade in hosts with cancer
Coutzac, C., Jouniaux, J.-M., Paci, A., Schmidt, J., Mallardo, D., Seck, A., Asvatourian, V., Cassard, L., Saulnier, P., Lacroix, L., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16079-x · Cited by 513 · see citing works
Colonic Butyrate-Producing Communities in Humans: an Overview Using Omics Data
Vital, M., Karch, A., & Pieper, D. H. (2017) · mSystems · doi:10.1128/msystems.00130-17 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
McCulloch, J. A., Davar, D., Rodrigues, R. R., Badger, J. H., Fang, J. R., Cole, A. M., Balaji, A. K., Vetizou, M., Prescott, S. M., Fernandes, M. R., et al. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01698-2 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Lee, K. A., Thomas, A. M., Bolte, L. A., Björk, J. R., de Ruijter, L. K., Armanini, F., Asnicar, F., Blanco-Miguez, A., Board, R., Calbet-Llopart, N., et al. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01695-5 · Cited by 464 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…between alpha diversity and cancer patient outcomes have been found in the setting of patients receiving hematopoietic cell transplant 29 or cervical cancer chemoradiation 30 but not in anti-PD-1 recipients with metastatic melanoma 16,18 ; thus, such associations may be treatment regimen specific.”
Gut microbiota signatures are associated with toxicity to combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade
Andrews, M. C., Duong, C. P. M., Gopalakrishnan, V., Iebba, V., Chen, W.-S., Derosa, L., Khan, M. A. W., Cogdill, A. P., White, M. G., Wong, M. C., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01406-6 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Accurate and complete genomes from metagenomes
Chen, L.-X., Anantharaman, K., Shaiber, A., Eren, A. M., & Banfield, J. F. (2020) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.258640.119 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Derosa, L., Routy, B., Fidelle, M., Iebba, V., Alla, L., Pasolli, E., Segata, N., Desnoyer, A., Pietrantonio, F., Ferrere, G., et al. (2020) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.044 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Nomura, M., Nagatomo, R., Doi, K., Shimizu, J., Baba, K., Saito, T., Matsumoto, S., Inoue, K., & Muto, M. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2895 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Wei, S. C., Anang, N.-A. A. S., Sharma, R., Andrews, M. C., Reuben, A., Levine, J. H., Cogdill, A. P., Mancuso, J. J., Wargo, J. A., Pe’er, D., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1821218116 · Cited by 359 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This is biologically plausible, given that we know that CICB has a distinct mechanism of action compared to anti-PD-1 mono-therapy 48 and distinct baseline tumor immune microenvironment signatures 49 .”
Zimmermann, J., Kaleta, C., & Waschina, S. (2021) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02295-1 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
GUNC: detection of chimerism and contamination in prokaryotic genomes
Orakov, A. N., Fullam, A., Coelho, L. P., Khedkar, S., Szklarczyk, D., Mende, D., Schmidt, T., & Bork, P. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02393-0 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Mao, J., Wang, D., Long, J., Xu, Y., Lin, J., Song, Y., Xie, F., Xun, Z., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., et al. (2021) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1136/jitc-2021-003334 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Relating the gut metagenome and metatranscriptome to immunotherapy responses in melanoma patients
Peters, B. A., Wilson, M., Moran, U., Pavlick, A., Izsak, A., Wechter, T., Weber, J. S., Osman, I., & Ahn, J. (2019) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-019-0672-4 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Bifidobacterium Longum: Protection against Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Yao, S., Zhao, Z., Wang, W., & Liu, X. (2021) · Journal of Immunology Research · doi:10.1155/2021/8030297 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Simpson, R. C., Shanahan, E. R., Batten, M., Reijers, I. L. M., Read, M., Silva, I. P., Versluis, J. M., Ribeiro, R., Angelatos, A. S., Tan, J., et al. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01965-2 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Major data analysis errors invalidate cancer microbiome findings
Gihawi, A., Ge, Y., Lu, J., Puiu, D., Xu, A., Cooper, C. S., Brewer, D. S., Pertea, M., & Salzberg, S. L. (2023) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01607-23 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Klein, O., Kee, D., Nagrial, A. M., Markman, B., Underhill, C. R., Michael, M., Jackett, L. A., Lum, C., Behren, A., Palmer, J., et al. (2020) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2814 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, S., Mao, Y., Zhang, Z.-Y., Li, Z., Kong, C., Chen, H., Cai, P., Han, B., Ye, T., & Wang, L. (2021) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.54476 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Tong, Z., Zhang, W., Zhang, W., Buzdin, A., Mu, X., Yan, Q., Zhao, X., Chang, H.-H., Duhon, M., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.683419 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Yang, C., Mogno, I., Contijoch, E. J., Borgerding, J. N., Aggarwala, V., Li, Z., Siu, S., Grasset, E. K., Helmus, D. S., Dubinsky, M. C., et al. (2020) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2020.01.016 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Limeta, A., Ji, B., Levin, M., Gatto, F., & Nielsen, J. (2020) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.140940 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Ventura, M., Turroni, F., Zomer, A., Foroni, E., Giubellini, V., Bottacini, F., Canchaya, C. A., Claesson, M. J., He, F., Mantzourani, M., et al. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000785 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Self-citationSimonsen, M., Mailund, T., & Pedersen, C. N. S. (2008) · Workshop on Algorithms in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87361-7_10 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Klein, O., Kee, D., Markman, B., Michael, M., Underhill, C. R., Carlino, M. S., Jackett, L. A., Lum, C., Scott, C. L., Nagrial, A. M., et al. (2020) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-0621 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Self-citationBarratt, M. J., Nuzhat, S., Ahsan, K., Frese, S. A., Arzamasov, A. A., Sarker, S. A., Islam, M. M., Palit, P., Islam, M. R., Hibberd, M. C., et al. (2022) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abk1107 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Park, H. J., Kim, K. W., Pyo, J., Suh, C. H., Yoon, S., Hatabu, H., & Nishino, M. (2020) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200443 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Lahti, L. (2017) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · doi:10.18129/b9.bioc.microbiome · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Newly Explored Faecalibacterium Diversity Is Connected to Age, Lifestyle, Geography, and Disease
De Filippis, F., Pasolli, E., & Ercolini, D. (2020) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.09.063 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Karcher, N., Nigro, E., Punčochář, M., Blanco-Míguez, A., Ciciani, M., Manghi, P., Zolfo, M., Cumbo, F., Manara, S., Golzato, D., et al. (2021) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02427-7 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Gut OncoMicrobiome Signatures (GOMS) as next-generation biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy
Thomas, A. M., Fidelle, M., Routy, B., Kroemer, G., Wargo, J. A., Segata, N., & Zitvogel, L. (2023) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-023-00785-8 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Sims, T. T., El Alam, M. B., Karpinets, T. V., Dorta-Estremera, S., Hegde, V. L., Nookala, S., Yoshida-Court, K., Wu, X., Biegert, G. W. G., Delgado Medrano, A. Y., et al. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-01741-x · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Predicting butyrate- and propionate-forming bacteria of gut microbiota from sequencing data
Kircher, B., Woltemate, S., Gutzki, F. M., Schlüter, D., Geffers, R., Bähre, H., & Vital, M. (2022) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2022.2149019 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Quantifying bias introduced by sample collection in relative and absolute microbiome measurements
Maghini, D. G., Dvorak, M., Dahlen, A., Roos, M., Doyle, B., Kuersten, S., & Bhatt, A. S. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01754-3 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Klein, O., Senko, C., Carlino, M. S., Markman, B., Jackett, L. A., Gao, B., Lum, C., Kee, D., Behren, A., Palmer, J., et al. (2021) · OncoImmunology · doi:10.1080/2162402x.2021.1908771 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationKlein, O., Kee, D., Gao, B., Markman, B., Duarte, J. D. G., Quigley, L. T., Jackett, L. A., Linklater, R., Strickland, A. H., Scott, C. L., et al. (2021) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1136/jitc-2021-003156 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationFigler, H. M., & Dudley, E. G. (2016) · Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1586/17474124.2016.1155449 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Machado, M. A. D. Á., de Moura, C. S., Chan, K., Curtis, J. R., Hudson, M., Abrahamowicz, M., Jamal, R., Pilote, L., & Bernatsky, S. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-71788-z · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
- Lemaître, G., Nogueira, F. & Aridas, C. K. Imbalanced-learn: a Python toolbox to tackle the curse of imbalanced datasets in machine learning. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18, 559–563 (2017).
- Therneau, T. M. & Grambsch, P. M. Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Andreu-Sánchez, S., Blanco-Míguez, A., Wang, D., Golzato, D., Manghi, P., Heidrich, V., Fackelmann, G., Zhernakova, D. V., Kurilshikov, A., Valles-Colomer, M., et al. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.04.014 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
<i>Faecalibacterium prausnitzii</i> strain EXL01 boosts efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors
Bredon, M., Danne, C., Pham, H. P., Ruffié, P., Bessede, A., Rolhion, N., Creusot, L., Brot, L., Alonso, I., Langella, P., et al. (2024) · OncoImmunology · doi:10.1080/2162402x.2024.2374954 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Macandog, A. D. G., Catozzi, C., Capone, M., Nabinejad, A., Nanaware, P. P., Liu, S., Vinjamuri, S., Stunnenberg, J. A., Galiè, S., Jodice, M. G., et al. (2024) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2024.10.006 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Surrogate markers of intestinal dysfunction associated with survival in advanced cancers
Birebent, R., Drubay, D., Alves Costa Silva, C., Marmorino, F., Vitali, G., Piccinno, G., Hurtado, Y., Bonato, A., Belluomini, L., Messaoudene, M., et al. (2025) · OncoImmunology · doi:10.1080/2162402x.2025.2484880 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Microbiota-centered interventions to boost immune checkpoint blockade therapies
Almonte, A. A., Thomas, S., & Zitvogel, L. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20250378 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gunjur, A., Shao, Y., Rozday, T., Klein, O., Mu, A., Haak, B. W., Markman, B., Kee, D., Carlino, M. S., Underhill, C., Frentzas, S., Michael, M., Gao, B., Palmer, J., Cebon, J., Behren, A., Adams, D. J., & Lawley, T. D.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
- La Trobe University (AU)
- European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
- The Alfred Hospital (AU)
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (AU)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Monash Health (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Westmead Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Gunjur, Ashray
- Lawley, Trevor D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Medicine
- Published
- 2024-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 797-809
- ISSN
- 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-170X
- PMC
- PMC10957475
- OpenAlex
- W4392356761
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 75 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 19 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 22.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- La Trobe University (cc-by)
- Funders
- Cancer Research Institute
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Wellcome Trust (220540/Z/20/A, Z/17/Z, 206194/Z17/Z, 220540, 206194)
- Australian Government
- Cancer Research UK (A25117, 21717, PHDSTU-Hist\100121, [C9685/A25117], C20510/A21717, 25117)
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
- Hudson Institute of Medical Research
- Tour de Cure
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Keywords
- gut microbiota, immune checkpoint blockade, PD-1, CTLA-4, strain-resolved metagenomics, microbiome biomarkers, treatment response prediction, rare tumor, progression-free survival, anti-PD-1 monotherapy
- MeSH terms
- Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Humans, Neoplasms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review