The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of Mechanically Matched Hydrogel Coatings to Improve the Biocompatibility of Neural Implants
Open accessAbstract
Glial scar is a significant barrier to neural implant function. Micromotion between the implant and tissue is suspected to be a key driver of glial scar formation around neural implants. This study explores the ability of soft hydrogel coatings to modulate glial scar formation by reducing local strain. PEG hydrogels with controllable thickness and elastic moduli were formed on the surface of neural probes. These coatings significantly reduced the local strain resulting from micromotion around the implants. Coated implants were found to significantly reduce scarring in vivo, compared to hard implants of identical diameter. Increasing implant diameter was found to significantly increase scarring for glass implants, as well as increase local BBB permeability, increase macrophage activation, and decrease the local neural density. These results highlight the tradeoff in mechanical benefit with the size effects from increasing the overall diameter following the addition of a hydrogel coating. This study emphasizes the importance of both mechanical and geometric factors of neural implants on chronic timescales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foreign body reaction to biomaterials
Anderson, J. M., Rodriguez, A., & Chang, D. T. (2008) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 · Cited by 5,138
Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes
Polikov, V. S., Tresco, P. A., & Reichert, W. M. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.08.015 · Cited by 1,896
Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles
Buzsáki, G. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1233 · Cited by 1,875
Biran, R., Martin, D. C., & Tresco, P. A. (2005) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.04.020 · Cited by 893
The bright side of the glial scar in CNS repair
Rolls, A., Shechter, R., & Schwartz, M. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2591 · Cited by 674
Canales, A., Jia, X., Froriep, U. P., Koppes, R. A., Tringides, C. M., Selvidge, J., Lu, C., Hou, C., Wei, L., Fink, Y., et al. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3093 · Cited by 668
Chronic recording capability of the Utah Intracortical Electrode Array in cat sensory cortex
Rousche, P. J., & Normann, R. A. (1998) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/s0165-0270(98)00031-4 · Cited by 646
A model of safe levels for electrical stimulation
Shannon, R. V. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.126616 · Cited by 526
Progress towards biocompatible intracortical microelectrodes for neural interfacing applications
Jorfi, M., Skousen, J. L., Weder, C., & Capadona, J. R. (2015) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/12/1/011001 · Cited by 384
Subbaroyan, J., Martin, D. C., & Kipke, D. R. (2005) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/2/4/006 · Cited by 368
Cited by
Yuk, H., Lu, B., & Zhao, X. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00595h · Cited by 2,108
Liu, X., Liu, J., Lin, S., & Zhao, X. (2020) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2019.12.026 · Cited by 1,023
Transparent Electronics for Wearable Electronics Application
Won, D., Bang, J., Choi, S. H., Pyun, K. R., Jeong, S., Lee, Y., & Ko, S. H. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00139 · Cited by 339
Park, S., Yuk, H., Zhao, R., Yim, Y. S., Woldeghebriel, E. W., Kang, J., Canales, A., Fink, Y., Choi, G. B., Zhao, X., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23802-9 · Cited by 312
Gulino, M., Kim, D., Pané, S., Santos, S. D., & Pêgo, A. P. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00689 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Spencer, K. C., Sy, J. C., Ramadi, K. B., Graybiel, A. M., Langer, R., & Cima, M. J.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2017-05-16
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12812-12812
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2612079677
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 7.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of Mechanically Matched Hydrogel Coatings to Improve the Biocompatibility of Neural Implants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-017-02107-2
- The paper
- Spencer, K. C., Sy, J. C., Ramadi, K. B., Graybiel, A. M., Langer, R., & Cima, M. J. (2017). Characterization of Mechanically Matched Hydrogel Coatings to Improve the Biocompatibility of Neural Implants. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02107-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.