Cited by 392Soil and Unsaturated FlowSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

Effect of surface and porosity of biochar on water holding capacity aiming indirectly at preservation of the Amazon biome

Open access
Batista, Estela M. C. C., Shultz, Juliana, Matos, Tassya T. S., Fornari, Mayara R., Ferreira, Thuany M., Szpoganicz, Bruno, de Freitas, Rilton A., Mangrich, Antonio S.·2018·Scientific Reports

Abstract

As part of efforts to reduce pressure on the Amazon and other biomes, one approach considered by Brazilian authorities and scientists is more intensive use of the soils of the interior of the northeast of the country, which are generally sandy, with low contents of organic matter and low water holding capacity and are frequently affected by severe droughts. In this work, biochars produced from waste biomasses were tested for the improvement of these soils. The highest BET (Brunauer-Emmett-Teller) specific surface areas were observed for all biochars. In the pH range studied, the water hyacinth plants (WH) sample showed the most negative zeta potentials, as well as the highest water holding capacity (WHC) values, while the zeta potentials of two quartzarenic neosol soils were consistent with their WHC values. The results suggested that despite the effect of porosity on water retention, the zeta potential could be associated with the presence of negative charges by which hydrated cationic counterions were absorbed and retained. The surface energy and its polar and dispersive components were associated with water retention, with sugar cane bagasse, orange peel, and water hyacinth biochars presenting higher SE values and larger polar components.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-28794-z

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A high surface area, large average pore size, and high total pore volume make biochar suitable for soil amendment by capturing CO2 and other greenhouse gases, lowering soil bulk density, increasing soil moisture retention and aeration, and reducing leaching of plant nutrients from the rhizosphere.

    “The high surface area, high average pore size, and high total pore volume make biochar appropriate for soil amendment in capturing CO 2 and other GHGs, decreasing SBD, increasing soil moisture retention and aeration, and reducing leaching of plant nutrients from the rhizosphere (Wijitkosum and Jiwnok 2019; Batista et al. 2018).”

    From Corn-cob Biochar Characterization and Application Effects to Carbon Dioxide (CO₂) Evolution in Acid Soil Added with Different Types of Fertilizers (2021) · cites this paper as Batista et al. 2018

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Biochar successfully captured CO2 through both surface adsorption and chemical reaction.

    “This is confirmed by Batista et al. (2018), noting that CO 2 was successfully captured by biochar related to both the surface adsorption and chemical reaction.”

    From Corn-cob Biochar Characterization and Application Effects to Carbon Dioxide (CO₂) Evolution in Acid Soil Added with Different Types of Fertilizers (2021) · cites this paper as Batista et al. (2018)

    The Methods section on specific surface area describes nitrogen adsorption to measure biochar properties, not CO2 capture. Results and Discussion mentions possible carbon sequestration in soil but does not say biochar captured CO2 through surface adsorption or chemical reaction. Searches for CO2 capture and those mechanisms found no supporting passage in our copy; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. [1]Mangrich, A. S. et al. in ACS Symposium Series (ed. Satinder Ahuja, Jailson B. de Andrade, Dionysios D. Dionysiou, Kiril D. Hristovski, B. G. L.) 1206, 339–354 (American Chemical Society, 2015).
  2. [2]Lal R Challenges and opportunities in soil organic matter research Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2009 60 158 169 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01114.x · DOI
  3. [3]Novotny EH Lessons from the Terra Preta de Índios of the Amazon Region for the Utilisation of Charcoal for Soil Amendment J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2009 20 1003 1010 10.1590/S0103-50532009000600002 · DOI
  4. [4]Rezende EIP Angelo LC Dos Santos SS Mangrich AS Biocarvão (Biochar) e sequestro de carbono Rev. Virtual Quim. 2011 3 426 433 10.5935/1984-6835.20110046 · DOI
  5. [5]Zhang J Liu J Liu R Effects of pyrolysis temperature and heating time on biochar obtained from the pyrolysis of straw and lignosulfonate Bioresour. Technol. 2015 176 288 291 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.011 25435066 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [7]Sousa AATC Figueiredo CC Sewage sludge biochar: effects on soil fertility and growth of radish Biol. Agric. Hortic. 2016 32 127 138 10.1080/01448765.2015.1093545 · DOI
  7. [9]Case SDC McNamara NP Reay DS Whitaker J The effect of biochar addition on N2O and CO2 emissions from a sandy loam soil – The role of soil aeration Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012 51 125 134 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [10]Basso AS Miguez FE Laird DA Horton R Westgate M Assessing potential of biochar for increasing water-holding capacity of sandy soils GCB Bioenergy 2013 5 132 143 10.1111/gcbb.12026 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [11]Jaafar NM Clode PL Abbott LK Microscopy observations of habitable space in biochar for colonization by fungal hyphae from soil J. Integr. Agric. 2014 13 483 490 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60703-0 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [12]Ventura M Sorrenti G Panzacchi P George E Tonon G Biochar Reduces Short-Term Nitrate Leaching from A Horizon in an Apple Orchard J. Environ. Qual. 2013 42 76 82 10.2134/jeq2012.0250 23673741 · DOI
  11. [13]Stewart CE Zheng J Botte J Cotrufo MF Co-generated fast pyrolysis biochar mitigates green-house gas emissions and increases carbon sequestration in temperate soils GCB Bioenergy 2012 5 153 164 10.1111/gcbb.12001 · DOI
  12. [14]Cayuela ML Biochar and denitrification in soils: when, how much and why does biochar reduce N2O emissions? Sci. Rep. 2013 3 1732 10.1038/srep01732 23615819 PMC3635057 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [15]Sohi, S., Lopez-Capel, E., Krull, E. & Bol, R. Biochar, Climate Change and Soil: A Review to Guide FutureResearch. CSIRO Land and Water Science Report05/09, 10.1139/Z03-132 (2009). · DOI
  14. [17]Tryon AEH Effect of Charcoal on Certain Physical, Chemical, and Biological Properties of Forest Soils Ecol. Monogr. 1948 18 81 115 10.2307/1948629 · DOI
  15. [19]Zabaniotou A Stavropoulos G Skoulou V Activated carbon from olive kernels in a two-stage process: Industrial improvement Bioresour. Technol. 2008 99 320 326 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.12.020 17307355 · DOI
  16. [20]Mukherjee A Zimmerman AR Harris W Surface chemistry variations among a series of laboratory-produced biochars Geoderma 2011 163 247 255 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.04.021 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [21]Dehkhoda AM West AH Ellis N Biochar based solid acid catalyst for biodiesel production Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2010 382 197 204 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.04.051 · DOI
  18. [22]Antal MJ Jr. Mochidzuki K Paredes LS Flash Carbonization of Biomass Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003 42 3690 3699 10.1021/ie0301839 · DOI
  19. [23]Greenland DJ Soil damage by intensive arable cultivation: temporary or permanent? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 1977 281 193 208 10.1098/rstb.1977.0133 · DOI
  20. [25]Hale SE The sorption and desorption of phosphate-P, ammonium-N and nitrate-N in cacao shell and corn cob biochars Chemosphere 2013 91 1612 1619 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.12.057 23369636 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [26]Francioso O Sanchez-Cortes S Bonora S Roldán ML Certini G Structural characterization of charcoal size-fractions from a burnt Pinus pinea forest by FT-IR, Raman and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopies J. Mol. Struct. 2011 994 155 162 10.1016/j.molstruc.2011.03.011 · DOI
  22. [28]Keiluweit M Nico PS Johnson M Kleber M Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar) Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010 44 1247 1253 10.1021/es9031419 20099810 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [30]Qian L Chen B Interactions of aluminum with biochars and oxidized biochars: Implications for the biochar aging process J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014 62 373 380 10.1021/jf404624h 24364719 · DOI
  24. [32]Li YH Adsorption of cadmium(II) from aqueous solution by surface oxidized carbon nanotubes Carbon N. Y. 2003 41 1057 1062 10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00440-2 · DOI
  25. [33]Huang CC Su YJ Removal of copper ions from wastewater by adsorption/electrosorption on modified activated carbon cloths J. Hazard. Mater. 2010 175 477 483 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.030 19896268 · DOI
  26. [34]Pinzari F Ascarelli P Cappelli E Mattei G Giorgi R Wettability of HF-CVD diamond films Diam. Relat. Mater. 2001 10 781 785 10.1016/S0925-9635(00)00609-9 · DOI
  27. [35]Azevedo AF The effect of surface treatment on oxidation of oxalic acid at nanocrystalline diamond films Diam. Relat. Mater. 2010 19 462 465 10.1016/j.diamond.2010.01.006 · DOI
  28. [37]Sierra DS B. Application of potentiometry to characterize acid and basic sites in humic substances: Testing the BEST7 program with a weak-acid mixture Anal. Chim. Acta 2001 445 89 98 10.1016/S0003-2670(01)01251-X · DOI
  29. [38]Bachmann J Universality of a surface tension - Contact-angle relation for hydrophobic soils of different texture J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2006 169 745 753 10.1002/jpln.200622022 · DOI
  30. [39]Owens DK Wendt RC Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1969 13 1741 1747 10.1002/app.1969.070130815 · DOI
  31. [40]Kaelble DH Dispersion-Polar Surface Tension Properties of Organic Solids J. Adhes. 1970 2 66 81 10.1080/0021846708544582 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Batista, E. M. C. C., Shultz, J., Matos, T. T. S., Fornari, M. R., Ferreira, T. M., Szpoganicz, B., de Freitas, R. A., & Mangrich, A. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR)
Corresponding author
Mangrich, Antonio S.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2018-07-16
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
10677-10677
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2873248319
Cited by
392
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 16
FWCI
27.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
CNPq is the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development CAPES is the Brazilian Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Keywords
biochar, water holding capacity, soil porosity, specific surface area, zeta potential, surface energy, water retention, sandy soil, drought, water hyacinth, sugarcane bagasse, orange peel, biomass waste, soil amendment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review