Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The 14q32 maternally imprinted locus is a major source of longitudinally stable circulating microRNAs as measured by small RNA sequencing

Valbuena, Gabriel N., Apostolidou, Sophia, Roberts, Rhiannon, Barnes, Julie, Alderton, Wendy, Harper, Lauren, Jacobs, Ian, Menon, Usha, Keun, Hector C.·2019·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Understanding the normal temporal variation of serum molecules is a critical factor for identifying useful candidate biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of chronic disease. Using small RNA sequencing in a longitudinal study of 66 women with no history of cancer, we determined the distribution and dynamics (via intraclass correlation coefficients, ICCs) of the miRNA profile over 3 time points sampled across 2–5 years in the course of the screening trial, UKCTOCS. We were able to define a subset of longitudinally stable miRNAs (ICC >0.75) that were individually discriminating of women who had no cancer over the study period. These miRNAs were dominated by those originating from the C14MC cluster that is subject to maternal imprinting. This assessment was not significantly affected by common confounders such as age, BMI or time to centrifugation nor alternative methods to data normalisation. Our analysis provides important benchmark data supporting the development of miRNA biomarkers for the impact of life-course exposure as well as diagnosis and prognostication of chronic disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-019-51948-6

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Distributions of study set demographic information. (A) age at sampling, (B) time to centrifugation, (C) BMI at recruitment, (D) Regional Centre of collection for our study set, (E) time difference between successive samples, and (F) time from first to last sample.
Figure 1 Distributions of study set demographic information. (A) age at sampling, (B) time to centrifugation, (C) BMI at recruitment, (D) Regional Centre of collection for our study set, (E) time difference between successive samples, and (F) time from first to last sample.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Abundance of miRNAs in circulation. (A) The top 20 miRNAs by percentage of total circulating miRNA. (B) Mean microRNA counts per million (cpm) in circulation, ordered by magnitude. (C) Cumulative fraction of total microRNAs for the top 100 microRNAs by abundance. (D) Cumulative distribution of miRNA detection rates at certain cpm thresholds.
Figure 2 Abundance of miRNAs in circulation. (A) The top 20 miRNAs by percentage of total circulating miRNA. (B) Mean microRNA counts per million (cpm) in circulation, ordered by magnitude. (C) Cumulative fraction of total microRNAs for the top 100 microRNAs by abundance. (D) Cumulative distribution of miRNA detection rates at certain cpm thresholds.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Confounding effects of age, BMI, regional centre, and time to centrifugation. Variance explained (R2) against p-values corrected for multiple testing for (A) age, (B) BMI at study enrollment, (C) regional centre of collection, and (D) time to centrifugation.
Figure 3 Confounding effects of age, BMI, regional centre, and time to centrifugation. Variance explained (R2) against p-values corrected for multiple testing for (A) age, (B) BMI at study enrollment, (C) regional centre of collection, and (D) time to centrifugation.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) for consistently detected circulating miRNAs. (A) Distribution of ICCs for consistently detected miRNAs, with a median ICC of 0.36 shown in red. (B) ICCs vs. read counts per million.
Figure 4 Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) for consistently detected circulating miRNAs. (A) Distribution of ICCs for consistently detected miRNAs, with a median ICC of 0.36 shown in red. (B) ICCs vs. read counts per million.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Comparison of ICCs calculated using total depth-normalized data compared to trimmed mean of m (TMM)-normalized data. (A) Distributions of ICCs and (B) scatter plot of ICCs for each miRNA of total depth-normalized data (as reads per million, RPM) and TMM- normalized data.
Figure 5 Comparison of ICCs calculated using total depth-normalized data compared to trimmed mean of m (TMM)-normalized data. (A) Distributions of ICCs and (B) scatter plot of ICCs for each miRNA of total depth-normalized data (as reads per million, RPM) and TMM- normalized data.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Comparison of ICCs from the longitudinal study carried out by Keller et al. (2017) and our own study. (A) Distributions of ICCs and (B) scatter plot comparing ICCs for 113 miRNAs detected in both studies.
Figure 6 Comparison of ICCs from the longitudinal study carried out by Keller et al. (2017) and our own study. (A) Distributions of ICCs and (B) scatter plot comparing ICCs for 113 miRNAs detected in both studies.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 A cluster of miRNAs with ICCs above 0.5 can be found on the long arm of chromosome 14.
Figure 7 A cluster of miRNAs with ICCs above 0.5 can be found on the long arm of chromosome 14.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Bartel, D. P. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 136(2), 215–33 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Baek, D. et al. The impact of microRNAs on protein output. Nature 455(7209), 64–71 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Carleton, M., Cleary, M. A. & Linsley, P. S. MicroRNAs and cell cycle regulation. Cell Cycle 6(17), 2127–32 (2007). · DOI
  4. Jovanovic, M. & Hengartner, M. O. miRNAs and apoptosis: RNAs to die for. Oncogene 25(46), 6176–87 (2006). · DOI
  5. Koufaris, C. et al. Systematic integration of molecular profiles identifies miR-22 as a regulator of lipid and folate metabolism in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 35(21), 2766–76 (2016). · DOI
  6. Stefani, G. & Slack, F. J. Small non-coding RNAs in animal development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9(3), 219–30 (2008). · DOI
  7. Mouradian, M. M. MicroRNAs in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis 46(2), 279–84 (2012). · DOI
  8. Condorelli, G., Latronico, M. V. & Cavarretta, E. microRNAs in cardiovascular diseases: current knowledge and the road ahead. J Am Coll Cardiol 63(21), 2177–87 (2014). · DOI
  9. Lu, J. et al. MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature 435(7043), 834–8 (2005). · DOI
  10. Rosenfeld, N. et al. MicroRNAs accurately identify cancer tissue origin. Nat Biotechnol 26(4), 462–9 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Mitchell, P. S. et al. Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(30), 10513–8 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Bianchi, F. et al. A serum circulating miRNA diagnostic test to identify asymptomatic high-risk individuals with early stage lung cancer. EMBO Mol Med 3(8), 495–503 (2011). · DOI
  13. Redell, J. B. et al. Human traumatic brain injury alters plasma microRNA levels. J Neurotrauma 27(12), 2147–56 (2010). · DOI
  14. de Candia, P. et al. A unique plasma microRNA profile defines type 2 diabetes progression. PLoS One 12(12), e0188980 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  15. He, Y. et al. Current State of Circulating MicroRNAs as Cancer Biomarkers. Clin Chem 61(9), 1138–55 (2015). · DOI
  16. Pogribny, I. P. MicroRNAs as biomarkers for clinical studies. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 243(3), 283–290 (2018). · DOI
  17. Jarry, J. et al. The validity of circulating microRNAs in oncology: five years of challenges and contradictions. Mol Oncol 8(4), 819–29 (2014). · DOI
  18. Tiberio, P. et al. Challenges in using circulating miRNAs as cancer biomarkers. Biomed Res Int 2015, 731479 (2015). · DOI
  19. Murray, M. J., Huddart, R. A. & Coleman, N. The present and future of serum diagnostic tests for testicular germ cell tumours. Nat Rev Urol 13(12), 715–725 (2016). · DOI
  20. Terbuch, A. et al. MiR-371a-3p Serum Levels Are Increased in Recurrence of Testicular Germ Cell Tumor Patients. Int J Mol Sci 19(10) (2018). · DOI
  21. Kim, M. et al. MIR144 and MIR451 regulate human erythropoiesis via RAB14. Br J Haematol 168(4), 583–97 (2015). · DOI
  22. Benetatos, L. et al. The microRNAs within the DLK1-DIO3 genomic region: involvement in disease pathogenesis. Cell Mol Life Sci 70(5), 795–814 (2013). · DOI
  23. Seitz, H. et al. A large imprinted microRNA gene cluster at the mouse Dlk1-Gtl2 domain. Genome Res 14(9), 1741–8 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Leidinger, P. et al. Longitudinal study on circulating miRNAs in patients after lung cancer resection. Oncotarget 6(18): p. 16674–85 (2015). · DOI
  25. Meerson, A. & Ploug, T. Assessment of six commercial plasma small RNA isolation kits using qRT-PCR and electrophoretic separation: higher recovery of microRNA following ultracentrifugation. Biology Methods and Protocols 1(1), bpw003–bpw003 (2016). · DOI
  26. Williams, Z. et al. Comprehensive profiling of circulating microRNA via small RNA sequencing of cDNA libraries reveals biomarker potential and limitations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(11), 4255–60 (2013). · DOI
  27. Cheloufi, S. et al. A dicer-independent miRNA biogenesis pathway that requires Ago catalysis. Nature 465(7298), 584–9 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Cifuentes, D. et al. A novel miRNA processing pathway independent of Dicer requires Argonaute2 catalytic activity. Science 328(5986), 1694–8 (2010). · DOI
  29. Dore, L. C. et al. A GATA-1-regulated microRNA locus essential for erythropoiesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(9), 3333–8 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Rasmussen, K. D. et al. The miR-144/451 locus is required for erythroid homeostasis. J Exp Med 207(7), 1351–8 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  31. Blondal, T. et al. Assessing sample and miRNA profile quality in serum and plasma or other biofluids. Methods 59(1), S1–6 (2013). · DOI
  32. Guo, Z. et al. Genome-wide survey of tissue-specific microRNA and transcription factor regulatory networks in 12 tissues. Sci Rep 4, 5150 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  33. Witwer, K. W. & Halushka, M. K. Toward the promise of microRNAs - Enhancing reproducibility and rigor in microRNA research. RNA Biol 13(11), 1103–1116 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  34. Juzenas, S. et al. A comprehensive, cell specific microRNA catalogue of human peripheral blood. Nucleic Acids Res 45(16), 9290–9301 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  35. Ameling, S. et al. Associations of circulating plasma microRNAs with age, body mass index and sex in a population-based study. BMC Med Genomics 8, 61 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  36. Majid, S. et al. Regulation of minichromosome maintenance gene family by microRNA-1296 and genistein in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 70(7), 2809–18 (2010). · DOI
  37. Gaedicke, S. et al. Vitamin E dependent microRNA regulation in rat liver. FEBS Lett 582(23–24), 3542–6 (2008). · DOI
  38. Bollati, V. et al. Exposure to metal-rich particulate matter modifies the expression of candidate microRNAs in peripheral blood leukocytes. Environ Health Perspect 118(6), 763–8 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  39. Cao, Y. et al. MicroRNA-dependent regulation of PTEN after arsenic trioxide treatment in bladder cancer cell line T24. Tumour Biol 32(1), 179–88 (2011). · DOI
  40. Avissar-Whiting, M. et al. Bisphenol A exposure leads to specific microRNA alterations in placental cells. Reprod Toxicol 29(4), 401–6 (2010). · DOI
  41. Rounge, T. B. et al. microRNA Biomarker Discovery and High-Throughput DNA Sequencing Are Possible Using Long-term Archived Serum Samples. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 24(9), 1381–7 (2015). · DOI
  42. Mestdagh, P. et al. Evaluation of quantitative miRNA expression platforms in the microRNA quality control (miRQC) study. Nat Methods 11(8), 809–15 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  43. Ogata, T. & Kagami, M. Kagami-Ogata syndrome: a clinically recognizable upd(14)pat and related disorder affecting the chromosome 14q32.2 imprinted region. J Hum Genet 61(2), 87–94 (2016). · DOI
  44. Tsang, E. K. et al. Small RNA Sequencing in Cells and Exosomes Identifies eQTLs and 14q32 as a Region of Active Export. G3 (Bethesda) 7(1), 31–39 (2017). · DOI
  45. Morales-Prieto, D. M. et al. Pregnancy-associated miRNA-clusters. J Reprod Immunol 97(1), 51–61 (2013). · DOI
  46. Mansego, M. L. et al. DNA methylation of miRNA coding sequences putatively associated with childhood obesity. Pediatr Obes 12(1), 19–27 (2017). · DOI
  47. Okamoto, K. et al. A Series of microRNA in the Chromosome 14q32.2 Maternally Imprinted Region Related to Progression of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in a Mouse Model. PLoS One 11(5), e0154676 (2016). · DOI
  48. Nadal, E. et al. A MicroRNA cluster at 14q32 drives aggressive lung adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 20(12), 3107–17 (2014). · DOI
  49. Uppal, A. et al. 14q32-encoded microRNAs mediate an oligometastatic phenotype. Oncotarget 6(6), 3540–52 (2015). · DOI
  50. Strub, G. M. et al. Endothelial and circulating C19MC microRNAs are biomarkers of infantile hemangioma. JCI Insight 1(14), e88856 (2016). · DOI
  51. Formosa, A. et al. MicroRNAs, miR-154, miR-299-5p, miR-376a, miR-376c, miR-377, miR-381, miR-487b, miR-485-3p, miR-495 and miR-654-3p, mapped to the 14q32.31 locus, regulate proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion in metastatic prostate cancer cells. Oncogene 33(44), 5173–82 (2014). · DOI
  52. Menon, U. et al. Risk Algorithm Using Serial Biomarker Measurements Doubles the Number of Screen-Detected Cancers Compared With a Single-Threshold Rule in the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening. J Clin Oncol 33(18), 2062–71 (2015). · DOI
  53. Menon, U. et al. Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). Lancet Oncol 10(4), 327–40 (2009). · DOI
  54. Nakagawa, S. & Schielzeth, H. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4(2), 133–142 (2013). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 13

Metadata

Authors
Valbuena, G. N., Apostolidou, S., Roberts, R., Barnes, J., Alderton, W., Harper, L., Jacobs, I., Menon, U., & Keun, H. C.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2019-10-31
Volume
9
Issue
1
ISSN
2045-2322
Cited by
13
References
5
Language
en
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (C19335/A22544, C1479/A2884)
  • RCUK | Medical Research Council (G9901012, G0801228)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review