Cited by 53Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsGene expression and cancer classification

Temporal changes in the gene expression heterogeneity during brain development and aging

Open access
Işıldak, Ulaş, Somel, Mehmet, Thornton, Janet M., Dönertaş, Handan Melike·2020·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Cells in largely non-mitotic tissues such as the brain are prone to stochastic (epi-)genetic alterations that may cause increased variability between cells and individuals over time. Although increased inter-individual heterogeneity in gene expression was previously reported, whether this process starts during development or if it is restricted to the aging period has not yet been studied. The regulatory dynamics and functional significance of putative aging-related heterogeneity are also unknown. Here we address these by a meta-analysis of 19 transcriptome datasets from three independent studies, covering diverse human brain regions. We observed a significant increase in inter-individual heterogeneity during aging (20 + years) compared to postnatal development (0 to 20 years). Increased heterogeneity during aging was consistent among different brain regions at the gene level and associated with lifespan regulation and neuronal functions. Overall, our results show that increased expression heterogeneity is a characteristic of aging human brain, and may influence aging-related changes in brain functions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-60998-0

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ultrastructural studies of human tissues have shown similar results, and different human brain regions exhibit different gene expression trajectories with age.

    “Ultrastructural studies of human tissues157 have shown similar results, and even different human brain regions exhibit different gene expression trajectories with age158.”

    From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [158]

  • Transcriptomic studies strongly agree that tissues, organs, and even sub-regions within an organ such as the brain age at different rates.

    “As mentioned above, transcriptomic studies strongly agree that tissues, organs, and even sub-regions within an organ such as the brain age at different rates.32,33”

    From Asynchronous, contagious and digital aging (2021) · cites this paper as [33]

  • In humans, a meta-analysis of >300 brains and 17 brain regions showed broad non-linear changes in gene expression which varied across brain regions with age.

    “In humans, a meta-analysis of >300 brains and 17 brain regions showed broad non-linear changes in gene expression which varied across brain regions with age.33”

    From Asynchronous, contagious and digital aging (2021) · cites this paper as [33]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Işıldak, U., Somel, M., Thornton, J. M., & Dönertaş, H. M.
Affiliations
  • Middle East Technical University (TR)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Dönertaş, Handan Melike
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-03-05
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
4080-4080
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3010435021
Cited by
53
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  • Wellcome Trust (098565/Z/12/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
gene expression heterogeneity, brain aging, brain development, interindividual variability, transcriptome, lifespan regulation, neuronal function, human brain regions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Brain, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Biomarkers, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Gene Expression Profiling, Young Adult, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review