Cited by 57Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactSustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisLivestock Farming and Management

Navigating Sustainability Trade-Offs in Global Beef Production

Open access
Castonguay, Adam C., Polasky, Stephen, H. Holden, Matthew, Herrero, Mario, Mason-D’Croz, Daniel, Godde, Cecile, Chang, Jinfeng, Gerber, James +7 more·2023·Nature Sustainability

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41893-022-01017-0

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Beef production exhibits a significant geographic concentration, primarily within North and South America, with Brazil and the United States standing out as major global players in both production and consumption.

    “Beef production exhibits a significant geographic concentration, primarily within North and South America, with Brazil and the United States standing out as major global players in both production and consumption [77,78,79].”

    From The Genomic Landscape of Cattle: Domestication, Dispersal, and Adaptive Evolution (2026) · cites this paper as [78]

    The 'Beef without borders' section (page unavailable) discusses beef production in North and Latin America, and the paper identifies production areas in Brazil and the United States. It does not establish that production is concentrated primarily in the Americas or that Brazil and the United States are major global players in both production and consumption; its consumption discussion is global rather than country-specific. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Forster, P. et al. in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) 129-234 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
  2. Schlesinger, W. H. & Bernhardt, E. S. Biogeochemistry: An Analysis of Global Change (Academic Press, 2013).
  3. IPCC Special Report on Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (eds Watson, R. T. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castonguay, A. C., Polasky, S., H. Holden, M., Herrero, M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Godde, C., Chang, J., Gerber, J., Witt, G. B., Game, E. T., A. Bryan, B., Wintle, B., Lee, K., Bal, P., & McDonald-Madden, E.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Castonguay, Adam C.
Venue
Nature Sustainability
Published
2023-01-02
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
284-294
ISSN
2398-9629 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313477585
Cited by
57
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Sustainability (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (FT170100140)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Livestock Farming and Management
Keywords
sustainable beef production, sustainability trade-offs, land use change, feed composition, land restoration, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, production costs, climate action, poverty and hunger, spatial resolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review