Cited by 891Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Scaling Vision Transformers

Open access
Zhai, Xiaohua, Kolesnikov, Alexander, Houlsby, Neil, Beyer, Lucas·2022·2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Attention-based neural networks such as the Vision Transformer (ViT) have recently attained state-of-the-art results on many computer vision benchmarks. Scale is a primary ingredient in attaining excellent results, therefore, understanding a model's scaling properties is a key to designing future generations effectively. While the laws for scaling Transformer language models have been studied, it is unknown how Vision Transformers scale. To address this, we scale ViT models and data, both up and down, and characterize the relationships between error rate, data, and compute. Along the way, we refine the architecture and training of ViT, reducing memory consumption and increasing accuracy of the resulting models. As a result, we successfully train a ViT model with two billion parameters, which attains a new state-of-the-art on ImageNet of 90.45% top-1 accuracy. The model also performs well for few-shot transfer, for example, reaching 84.86% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet with only 10 examples per class.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01179

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our findings suggest that evolution of embodied intelligent behavior, biological or artificial, may require coordinated scaling of visual acuity and processing.

    “While AI systems focus on scaling neural, data, and computation capacity (30, 31, 74–77), our findings suggest that evolution of embodied intelligent behavior (biological or artificial) may require coordinated scaling of visual acuity and processing.”

    From What if eye...? Computationally recreating vision evolution (2025) · cites this paper as [75]

  • The information stored in parametric memory is positively correlated with the scale of model parameters N, the size of the training dataset D, and the amount of computation used during training C.

    “Specifically, the information stored in parametric memory is positively correlated with the scale of model parameters N , the size of the training dataset D , and the amount of computation used during training C .”

    From Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory (2024) · cites this paper as [164]

  • Simultaneously scaling up model parameter size N, training data size D, and computation C can enhance the storage capability of parametric memory.

    “According to Zhai et al. [164], simultaneously scaling up the model parameter size N , training data size D , and computation C can enhance the storage capability of parametric memory.”

    From Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory (2024) · cites this paper as [164]

  • Zhai et al. [2022] mapped scaling laws for vision transformers on image classification, observing predictable gains and saturation effects with model and data scale.

    “Zhai et al. [2022] mapped scaling laws for vision transformers on image classification, observing predictable gains and saturation effects with model and data scale”
  • The ViT-g architecture with embedding dimension 1536 and 24 heads did not show significant differences in final accuracy compared to the architecture proposed by Zhai et al. (2022).

    “Our experiments did not show significant differences in final accuracy, and our ViT-g backbone counts 1.1B parameters.”

    From DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision (2023) · cites this paper as Zhai et al., 2022

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhai, X., Kolesnikov, A., Houlsby, N., & Beyer, L.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-06
Pages
1204-1213
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3172942063
Cited by
891
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 114 · 2025: 204 · 2024: 253 · 2023: 191 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 1
FWCI
67.64
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
vision transformer, model scaling, attention-based neural networks, training efficiency, memory usage, ImageNet, few-shot transfer learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review