Cited by 192Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyEthics in Clinical ResearchGenetics and Physical Performance

Exploring the association of genetic factors with participation in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

Open access
Taylor, Amy E, Jones, Hannah J, Sallis, Hannah, Euesden, Jack, Stergiakouli, Evie, Davies, Neil M, Zammit, Stanley, Lawlor, Debbie A +3 more·2018·International Journal of Epidemiology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: It is often assumed that selection (including participation and dropout) does not represent an important source of bias in genetic studies. However, there is little evidence to date on the effect of genetic factors on participation. Methods: Using data on mothers (N = 7486) and children (N = 7508) from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, we: (i) examined the association of polygenic risk scores for a range of sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics and health conditions related to continued participation; (ii) investigated whether associations of polygenic scores with body mass index (BMI; derived from self-reported weight and height) and self-reported smoking differed in the largest sample with genetic data and a subsample who participated in a recent follow-up; and (iii) determined the proportion of variation in participation explained by common genetic variants, using genome-wide data. Results: We found evidence that polygenic scores for higher education, agreeableness and openness were associated with higher participation; and polygenic scores for smoking initiation, higher BMI, neuroticism, schizophrenia, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and depression were associated with lower participation. Associations between the polygenic score for education and self-reported smoking differed between the largest sample with genetic data [odds ratio (OR) for ever smoking per standard deviation (SD) increase in polygenic score: 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81, 0.89} and subsample (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.03). In genome-wide analysis, single nucleotide polymorphism based heritability explained 18-32% of variability in participation. Conclusions: Genetic association studies, including Mendelian randomization, can be biased by selection, including loss to follow-up. Genetic risk for dropout should be considered in all analyses of studies with selective participation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyy060

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of family data to conduct MR analyses can account for confounding owing to dynastic effects and assortative mating.

    “One solution that can account for confounding owing to dynastic effects and assortative mating is the use of family data to conduct the MR analyses.167,168”

    From Mendelian randomization (2022) · cites this paper as [167]

  • Within-family MR requires data from either pairs of siblings or mother-father-child trios and allows for estimation of causal effects using MR after family-level structure has been taken into account.

    “Within-family MR requires data from either pairs of siblings or mother–father–child trios and allows for estimation of causal effects using MR after family-level structure has been taken into account.164,167”

    From Mendelian randomization (2022) · cites this paper as [167]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, A. E., Jones, H. J., Sallis, H., Euesden, J., Stergiakouli, E., Davies, N. M., Zammit, S., Lawlor, D. A., Munafò, M. R., Davey Smith, G., & Tilling, K.
Affiliations
  • University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
Corresponding author
Tilling, Kate
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2018-05-23
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
1207-1216
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2800807051
Cited by
192
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 6
FWCI
12.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council and Wellcome (102215/2/13/2)
  • University of Bristol
  • British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council
  • UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12013/1, MC_UU_12013/5, MC_UU_12013/6, MC_UU_12013/9, MR/M006727/1)
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Clinical Research Collaboration
  • NIHR
  • Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
  • MRC
  • NHS
  • Department of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Physical Performance
Keywords
research participation, loss to follow-up, selection bias, polygenic risk score, body mass index, smoking, educational attainment, personality traits, schizophrenia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, depression, Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Risk Factors, Genetic Variation, Selection Bias, Body Mass Index, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Multifactorial Inheritance, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review