CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 79

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Systems Age: a single blood methylation test to quantify aging heterogeneity across 11 physiological systems

Sehgal, Raghav, Markov, Yaroslav, Qin, Chenxi, Meer, Margarita, Hadley, Courtney, Shadyab, Aladdin H., Casanova, Ramon, Manson, JoAnn E., Bhatti, Parveen, Moore, Ann Z., Crimmins, Eileen M., Hagg, Sara, Assimes, Themistocles L., Whitsel, Eric A., Higgins-Chen, Albert T., Levine, Morgan·2025·Nature Aging
DOI 10.1038/s43587-025-00958-3PMC PMC13222069

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43587-025-00958-3

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Moqri, M. et al. Biomarkers of aging for the identification and evaluation of longevity interventions. Cell 186, 3758–3775 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Horvath, S. & Raj, K. DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 371–384 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Jylhävä, J., Pedersen, N. L. & Hägg, S. Biological age predictors. EBioMedicine 21, 29–36 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Oblak, L., van der Zaag, J., Higgins-Chen, A. T., Levine, M. E. & Boks, M. P. A systematic review of biological, social and environmental factors associated with epigenetic clock acceleration. Ageing Res. Rev. 69, 101348 (2021). · DOI
  5. Levine, M. E. et al. An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan. Aging 10, 573–591 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Yousefi, P. D. et al. DNA methylation-based predictors of health: applications and statistical considerations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 23, 369–383 (2022). · DOI
  7. Belsky, D. W. et al. DunedinPACE, a DNA methylation biomarker of the pace of aging. eLife 11, e73420 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Li, Y. et al. A programmable fate decision landscape underlies single-cell aging in yeast. Science 369, 325–329 (2020). · DOI
  9. Trapp, A., Kerepesi, C. & Gladyshev, V. N. Profiling epigenetic age in single cells. Nat. Aging 1, 1189–1201 (2021). · DOI
  10. Nie, C. et al. Distinct biological ages of organs and systems identified from a multi-omics study. Cell Rep. 38, 110459 (2022). · DOI
  11. Sluiskes, M. H. et al. Clarifying the biological and statistical assumptions of cross-sectional biological age predictors: an elaborate illustration using synthetic and real data. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 24, 58 (2024). · DOI
  12. Schaie, K. W. Age changes and age differences. Gerontologist 7, 128–132 (1967). · DOI
  13. Nelson, P. G., Promislow, D. E. L. & Masel, J. Biomarkers for aging identified in cross-sectional studies tend to be non-causative. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 75, 466–472 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Fernández-Sanlés, A. et al. DNA methylation biomarkers of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular disease. Clin. Epigenetics 13, 86 (2021). · DOI
  15. Westerman, K. et al. Epigenomic assessment of cardiovascular disease risk and interactions with traditional risk metrics. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 9, e015299 (2020). · DOI
  16. Hidalgo, B. A. et al. A 6-CpG validated methylation risk score model for metabolic syndrome: the HyperGEN and GOLDN studies. PLoS ONE 16, e0259836 (2021). · DOI
  17. Higgins-Chen, A. T., Thrush, K. L., Wang, Y. & Minteer, C. J. A computational solution for bolstering reliability of epigenetic clocks: implications for clinical trials and longitudinal tracking. Nat. Aging 2, 644–661 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Gao, X., Zhang, Y., Breitling, L. P. & Brenner, H. Relationship of tobacco smoking and smoking-related DNA methylation with epigenetic age acceleration. Oncotarget 7, 46878–46889 (2016). · DOI
  19. Weiner, M. W. et al. The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: a review of papers published since its inception. Alzheimers Dement. 9, e111–e194 (2013). · DOI
  20. Ferrucci, L. The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA): a 50-year-long journey and plans for the future. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 63, 1416–1419 (2008). · DOI
  21. Wang, Y. et al. Epigenetic influences on aging: a longitudinal genome-wide methylation study in old Swedish twins. Epigenetics 13, 975–987 (2018). · DOI
  22. Aronow, W. S. Heart disease and aging. Med. Clin. North Am. 90, 849–862 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Roth, G. A. et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: update from the GBD 2019 Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 76, 2982–3021 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Grais, I. M. & Sowers, J. R. Thyroid and the heart. Am. J. Med. 127, 691–698 (2014). · DOI
  25. Bartekova, M., Radosinska, J., Jelemensky, M. & Dhalla, N. S. Role of cytokines and inflammation in heart function during health and disease. Heart Fail. Rev. 23, 733–758 (2018). · DOI
  26. Simmonds, R. E. & Foxwell, B. M. Signalling, inflammation and arthritis: NF-κB and its relevance to arthritis and inflammation. Rheumatology 47, 584–590 (2008). · DOI
  27. Walker, K. A. et al. Systemic inflammation during midlife and cognitive change over 20 years: the ARIC Study. Neurology 92, e1256–e1267 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Brinkley, T. E. et al. Chronic inflammation is associated with low physical function in older adults across multiple comorbidities. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 64, 455–461 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Franceschi, C., Garagnani, P., Parini, P., Giuliani, C. & Santoro, A. Inflammaging: a new immune-metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 14, 576–590 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Ikram, M. A. et al. Brain tissue volumes in relation to cognitive function and risk of dementia. Neurobiol. Aging 31, 378–386 (2010). · DOI
  31. Wannamethee, S. G. & Atkins, J. L. Sarcopenic obesity and cardiometabolic health and mortality in older adults: a growing health concern in an ageing population. Curr. Diab. Rep. 23, 307–314 (2023). · DOI
  32. Taylor, J. A. et al. Multisystem physiological perspective of human frailty and its modulation by physical activity. Physiol. Rev. 103, 1137–1191 (2023). · DOI
  33. Levine, M. E. et al. Menopause accelerates biological aging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 9327–9332 (2016). · DOI
  34. Trichopoulos, D., MacMahon, B. & Cole, P. Menopause and breast cancer risk. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 48, 605–613 (1972).
  35. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies. Lancet Oncol. 13, 1141–1151 (2012). · DOI
  36. Wu, H. & Ballantyne, C. M. Metabolic inflammation and insulin resistance in obesity. Circ. Res. 126, 1549–1564 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  37. Romagnani, P. et al. Chronic kidney disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 3, 17088 (2017). · DOI
  38. Sepe, V., Libetta, C., Gregorini, M. & Rampino, T. The innate immune system in human kidney inflammaging. J. Nephrol. 35, 381–395 (2022). · DOI
  39. Chen, Q. et al. OMICmAge: an integrative multi-omics approach to quantify biological age with electronic medical records. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.16.562114 (2023). · DOI
  40. Crimmins, E. M., Thyagarajan, B. & Levine, M. E. Associations of age, sex, race/ethnicity, and education with 13 epigenetic clocks in a nationally representative US sample: the Health and Retirement Study. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 76, 1117–1123 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  41. Kannel, W. B., Feinleib, M., McNamara, P. M., Garrison, R. J. & Castelli, W. P. An investigation of coronary heart disease in families: the Framingham Offspring Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 110, 281–290 (1979). · DOI
  42. Splansky, G. L. et al. The Third Generation Cohort of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Framingham Heart Study: design, recruitment, and initial examination. Am. J. Epidemiol. 165, 1328–1335 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  43. Jolliffe, I. T. A note on the use of principal components in regression. J. R. Stat. Soc., C: Appl. Stat. 31, 300–303 (1982).
  44. The Women’s Health Initiative Study Group. Design of the Women’s Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. Control. Clin. Trials 19, 61–109 (1998). · DOI
  45. Kuo, P. L. et al. A roadmap to build a phenotypic metric of ageing: insights from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J. Intern. Med. 287, 373–394 (2020). · DOI
  46. Thrush, K. L., Higgins-Chen, A. T., Liu, Z. & Levine, M. E. R methylCIPHER: a methylation clock investigational package for hypothesis-driven evaluation & research. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.13.499978 (2022). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 79

Metadata

Authors
Sehgal, R., Markov, Y., Qin, C., Meer, M., Hadley, C., Shadyab, A. H., Casanova, R., Manson, J. E., Bhatti, P., Moore, A. Z., Crimmins, E. M., Hagg, S., Assimes, T. L., Whitsel, E. A., Higgins-Chen, A. T., & Levine, M.
ORCID
Venue
Nature Aging
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2025-09-15
Volume
5
Issue
9
Pages
1880-1896
ISSN
2662-8465
DOI
10.1038/s43587-025-00958-3
PMC
PMC13222069
Cited by
79
References
12
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Gruber Foundation (-)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review