CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 736

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biomarkers of aging for the identification and evaluation of longevity interventions

Moqri, Mahdi, Herzog, Chiara, Poganik, Jesse R., Justice, Jamie, Belsky, Daniel W., Higgins-Chen, Albert, Moskalev, Alexey, Fuellen, Georg, Cohen, Alan A., Bautmans, Ivan, Widschwendter, Martin, Ding, Jingzhong, Fleming, Alexander, Mannick, Joan, Han, Jing-Dong Jackie, Zhavoronkov, Alex, Barzilai, Nir, Kaeberlein, Matt, Cummings, Steven, Kennedy, Brian K., Ferrucci, Luigi, Horvath, Steve, Verdin, Eric, Maier, Andrea B., Snyder, Michael P., Sebastiano, Vittorio, Gladyshev, Vadim N.·2023·Cell
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.003PMC PMC11088934
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.003

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 95

  1. Cohen, 2020, Lack of consensus on an aging biology paradigm? A global survey reveals an agreement to disagree, and the need for an interdisciplinary framework, Mech. Ageing Dev., 191, 10.1016/j.mad.2020.111316 · DOI
  2. Gladyshev, 2021, Molecular damage in aging, Nat. Aging, 1, 1096, 10.1038/s43587-021-00150-3 · DOI
  3. Lee, 2018, Translational geroscience: From invertebrate models to companion animal and human interventions, Transl. Med. Aging, 2, 15, 10.1016/j.tma.2018.08.002 · DOI
  4. Wagner, 2016, Biomarkers of Aging: From Function to Molecular Biology, Nutrients, 8, 338, 10.3390/nu8060338 · DOI
  5. Partridge, 2020, The quest to slow ageing through drug discovery, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 19, 513, 10.1038/s41573-020-0067-7 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Sierra, 2017, Geroscience and the trans-NIH Geroscience Interest Group, Geroscience, 39, 1, 10.1007/s11357-016-9954-6 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Baker, 1988, Biomarkers of aging, Exp. Gerontol., 23, 223, 10.1016/0531-5565(88)90025-3 · DOI
  8. Kaeberlein, 2018, How healthy is the healthspan concept?, GeroScience, 40, 361, 10.1007/s11357-018-0036-9 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Moskalev, 2017, Geroprotectors: A Unified Concept and Screening Approaches, Aging Dis., 8, 354, 10.14336/AD.2016.1022 · DOI
  10. Comfort, 1969, TEST-BATTERY TO MEASURE AGEING-RATE IN MAN, Lancet, 2, 1411, 10.1016/S0140-6736(69)90950-7 · DOI
  11. Butler, 2004, Aging: The Reality: Biomarkers of Aging: From Primitive Organisms to Humans, J. Gerontol. Ser. A, 59, B560, 10.1093/gerona/59.6.B560 · DOI
  12. Lara, 2015, A proposed panel of biomarkers of healthy ageing, BMC Med., 13, 222, 10.1186/s12916-015-0470-9 · DOI
  13. Hannum, 2013, Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates, Mol. Cell, 49, 359, 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.016 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Fransquet, 2019, The epigenetic clock as a predictor of disease and mortality risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Clin. Epigenetics, 11, 62, 10.1186/s13148-019-0656-7 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Jurić, 2020, Effects of estradiol on biological age measured using the glycan age index, Aging, 12, 19756, 10.18632/aging.104060 · DOI
  16. Macdonald-Dunlop, 2022, A catalogue of omics biological ageing clocks reveals substantial commonality and associations with disease risk, Aging, 14, 623, 10.18632/aging.203847 · DOI
  17. Levine, 2018, An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan, Aging, 10, 573, 10.18632/aging.101414 · DOI · Paper page
  18. McCrory, 2021, GrimAge Outperforms Other Epigenetic Clocks in the Prediction of Age-Related Clinical Phenotypes and All-Cause Mortality, J. Gerontol. Ser. A, 76, 741, 10.1093/gerona/glaa286 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Belsky, 2022, DunedinPACE, a DNA methylation biomarker of the pace of aging, Elife, 11, 10.7554/eLife.73420 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Sugden, 2022, Association of Pace of Aging Measured by Blood-Based DNA Methylation With Age-Related Cognitive Impairment and Dementia, Neurology, 99, e1402, 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200898 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Earls, 2019, Multi-Omic Biological Age Estimation and Its Correlation With Wellness and Disease Phenotypes: A Longitudinal Study of 3,558 Individuals, J. Gerontol. Ser. A, 74, S52, 10.1093/gerona/glz220 · DOI
  22. Mamoshina, 2018, Population Specific Biomarkers of Human Aging: A Big Data Study Using South Korean, Canadian, and Eastern European Patient Populations, J. Gerontol. Ser. A, 73, 1482, 10.1093/gerona/gly005 · DOI
  23. Mamoshina, 2018, Machine Learning on Human Muscle Transcriptomic Data for Biomarker Discovery and Tissue-Specific Drug Target Identification, Front. Genet., 9, 242, 10.3389/fgene.2018.00242 · DOI
  24. Kwon, 2021, A toolkit for quantification of biological age from blood chemistry and organ function test data: BioAge, GeroScience, 43, 2795, 10.1007/s11357-021-00480-5 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Lu, 2019, DNA methylation-based estimator of telomere length, Aging, 11, 5895, 10.18632/aging.102173 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Chen, 2019, Effects of Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Epigenetic Aging in Overweight and Obese African Americans With Suboptimal Vitamin D Status: A Randomized Clinical Trial, J. Gerontol. Ser. A, 74, 91, 10.1093/gerona/gly223 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Yi, 2023, The efficacy and safety of β-nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) supplementation in healthy middle-aged adults: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-dependent clinical trial, GeroScience, 45, 29, 10.1007/s11357-022-00705-1 · DOI
  28. Gladyshev, 2016, Aging: progressive decline in fitness due to the rising deleteriome adjusted by genetic, environmental, and stochastic processes, Aging Cell, 15, 594, 10.1111/acel.12480 · DOI
  29. Buckley, 2023, Cell-type-specific aging clocks to quantify aging and rejuvenation in neurogenic regions of the brain, Nat. Aging, 3, 121, 10.1038/s43587-022-00335-4 · DOI
  30. Nie, 2022, Distinct biological ages of organs and systems identified from a multi-omics study, Cell Rep., 38, 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110459 · DOI
  31. Cohen, 2018, The risks of biomarker-based epidemiology: Associations of circulating calcium levels with age, mortality, and frailty vary substantially across populations, Exp. Gerontol., 107, 11, 10.1016/j.exger.2017.07.011 · DOI
  32. Pyrkov, 2021, Deep longitudinal phenotyping of wearable sensor data reveals independent markers of longevity, stress, and resilience, Aging, 13, 7900, 10.18632/aging.202816 · DOI
  33. Jansen, 2021, An integrative study of five biological clocks in somatic and mental health, Elife, 10, 10.7554/eLife.59479 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Belsky, 2018, Eleven Telomere, Epigenetic Clock, and Biomarker-Composite Quantifications of Biological Aging: Do They Measure the Same Thing?, Am. J. Epidemiol., 187, 1220
  35. Reimann, 2022, Interrelationships and determinants of aging biomarkers in cord blood, J. Transl. Med., 20, 353, 10.1186/s12967-022-03541-1 · DOI
  36. Li, 2020, Longitudinal trajectories, correlations and mortality associations of nine biological ages across 20-years follow-up, Elife, 9
  37. Xia, 2017, Molecular and phenotypic biomarkers of aging, F1000Res., 6, 860, 10.12688/f1000research.10692.1 · DOI
  38. Hartmann, 2021, Ranking Biomarkers of Aging by Citation Profiling and Effort Scoring, Front. Genet., 12, 10.3389/fgene.2021.686320 · DOI
  39. Agarwala, 2020, Six-Minute Walk Test Clinical Role, Technique, Coding, and Reimbursement, Chest, 157, 603, 10.1016/j.chest.2019.10.014 · DOI
  40. Baran, 2021, Digital Biomarkers Enable Automated, Longitudinal Monitoring in a Mouse Model of Aging, J. Gerontol. Ser. A, 76, 1206, 10.1093/gerona/glab024 · DOI
  41. Justice, 2018, A framework for selection of blood-based biomarkers for geroscience-guided clinical trials: report from the TAME Biomarkers Workgroup, GeroScience, 40, 419, 10.1007/s11357-018-0042-y · DOI · Paper page
  42. Bürkle, 2015, MARK-AGE biomarkers of ageing, Mech. Ageing Dev., 151, 2, 10.1016/j.mad.2015.03.006 · DOI
  43. Zhu, 2019, CancerClock: A DNA Methylation Age Predictor to Identify and Characterize Aging Clock in Pan-Cancer, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 7, 388, 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00388 · DOI
  44. Chen, 2022, DNA Methylation, Aging, and Cancer Risk: A Mini-Review, Front. Bioinform., 2, 10.3389/fbinf.2022.847629 · DOI
  45. Simrén, 2021, The diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease, Alzheimers Dement., 17, 1145, 10.1002/alz.12283 · DOI
  46. O’Connell, 2019, Mortality in Relation to Changes in a Healthy Aging Index: The Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study, J. Gerontol. Ser. A, 74, 726, 10.1093/gerona/gly114 · DOI
  47. Fleming, 2012, Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in clinical trials, Stat. Med., 31, 2973, 10.1002/sim.5403 · DOI
  48. Justice, 2020, Aging and Geroscience: Putting epigenetic biomarkers to the test for clinical trials, Elife, 9, 10.7554/eLife.58592 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Pun, 2022, Hallmarks of aging-based dual-purpose disease and age-associated targets predicted using PandaOmics AI-powered discovery engine, Aging, 14, 2475, 10.18632/aging.203960 · DOI
  50. Moskalev, 2016, Developing criteria for evaluation of geroprotectors as a key stage toward translation to the clinic, Aging Cell, 15, 407, 10.1111/acel.12463 · DOI
  51. Sprott, 1999, Biomarkers of Aging, J. Gerontol. Ser. A, 54, B464, 10.1093/gerona/54.11.B464 · DOI
  52. Hertel, 2019, The informative error: A framework for the construction of individualized phenotypes, Stat. Methods Med. Res., 28, 1427, 10.1177/0962280218759138 · DOI
  53. Wey, 2019, An Emergent Integrated Aging Process Conserved Across Primates, J. Gerontol. Ser. A, 74, 1689, 10.1093/gerona/glz110 · DOI
  54. Li, 2015, Homeostatic dysregulation proceeds in parallel in multiple physiological systems, Aging Cell, 14, 1103, 10.1111/acel.12402 · DOI
  55. Cohen, 2021, Robust Physiological Metrics From Sparsely Sampled Networks, Front. Physiol., 12, 10.3389/fphys.2021.624097 · DOI
  56. Levine, 2020, Assessment of Epigenetic Clocks as Biomarkers of Aging in Basic and Population Research, J. Gerontol. Ser. A, 75, 463, 10.1093/gerona/glaa021 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Maddock, 2020, DNA methylation age and physical and cognitive ageing, J. Gerontol. Ser. A, 75, 504
  58. McCrory, 2020, Epigenetic Clocks and Allostatic Load Reveal Potential Sex-Specific Drivers of Biological Aging, J. Gerontol. Ser. A, 75, 495
  59. Guerville, 2020, Revisiting the Hallmarks of Aging to Identify Markers of Biological Age, J. Prev. Alzheimers Dis., 7, 56
  60. Moqri, 2022, PRC2 clock: a universal epigenetic biomarker of aging and rejuvenation, bioRxiv
  61. Levine, 2022, Clock Work: Deconstructing the Epigenetic Clock Signals in Aging, Disease, and Reprogramming, bioRxiv
  62. Ying, 2022, Causal Epigenetic Age Uncouples Damage and Adaptation, bioRxiv
  63. Aminzadeh-Gohari, 2022, Dietary restriction in senolysis and prevention and treatment of disease, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 1
  64. Bao, 2023, Biomarkers of aging, Sci. China Life Sci., 66, 893, 10.1007/s11427-023-2305-0 · DOI
  65. López-Otín, 2023, Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe, Cell, 10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Johnson, 2006, Recent results: Biomarkers of aging, Exp. Gerontol., 41, 1243, 10.1016/j.exger.2006.09.006 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Horvath, 2022, DNA methylation clocks for dogs and humans, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 119, 10.1073/pnas.2120887119 · DOI
  68. Lu, 2023, Universal DNA methylation age across mammalian tissues, Nat Aging
  69. Bobrov, 2018, PhotoAgeClock: deep learning algorithms for development of non-invasive visual biomarkers of aging, Aging, 10, 3249, 10.18632/aging.101629 · DOI
  70. Schultz, 2020, Age and life expectancy clocks based on machine learning analysis of mouse frailty, Nat. Commun., 11, 4618, 10.1038/s41467-020-18446-0 · DOI
  71. Calado, 2013, Telomere Dynamics in Mice and Humans, Semin. Hematol., 50, 165, 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2013.03.030 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Palliyaguru, 2021, Fasting blood glucose as a predictor of mortality: Lost in translation, Cell Metab., 33, 2189, 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.08.013 · DOI
  73. Horvath, 2016, An epigenetic clock analysis of race/ethnicity, sex, and coronary heart disease, Genome Biol., 17, 171, 10.1186/s13059-016-1030-0 · DOI
  74. Kraft, 2020, Multi-system physiological dysregulation and ageing in a subsistence population, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 375, 10.1098/rstb.2019.0610 · DOI
  75. Yegorov, 2020, The Link between Chronic Stress and Accelerated Aging, Biomedicines, 8, 198, 10.3390/biomedicines8070198 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Crimmins, 2009, Poverty and Biological Risk: The Earlier “Aging” of the Poor, J. Gerontol. Ser. A, 64, 286, 10.1093/gerona/gln010 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Gonzalo, 2017, Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome: A premature aging disease caused by LMNA gene mutations, Ageing Res. Rev., 33, 18, 10.1016/j.arr.2016.06.007 · DOI · Paper page
  78. Ashapkin, 2019, Are There Common Mechanisms Between the Hutchinson–Gilford Progeria Syndrome and Natural Aging?, Front. Genet., 10, 455, 10.3389/fgene.2019.00455 · DOI
  79. Bischoff-Ferrari, 2021, DO-HEALTH: Vitamin D3 - Omega-3 - Home exercise - Healthy aging and longevity trial - Design of a multinational clinical trial on healthy aging among European seniors, Contemp. Clin. Trials, 100, 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106124 · DOI
  80. Trapp, 2021, Profiling epigenetic age in single cells, Nat. Aging, 1, 1189, 10.1038/s43587-021-00134-3 · DOI
  81. Griffin, 2022, TIME-Seq Enables Scalable and Inexpensive Epigenetic Age Predictions, bioRxiv
  82. Dobbin, 2016, Validation of biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy in cancer: Volume II — clinical validation and regulatory considerations, J. Immunother. Cancer, 4, 77, 10.1186/s40425-016-0179-0 · DOI
  83. Higgins-Chen, 2022, A computational solution for bolstering reliability of epigenetic clocks: implications for clinical trials and longitudinal tracking, Nat. Aging, 2, 644, 10.1038/s43587-022-00248-2 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Sugden, 2020, Patterns of Reliability: Assessing the Reproducibility and Integrity of DNA Methylation Measurement, Patterns, 1, 10.1016/j.patter.2020.100014 · DOI · Paper page
  85. Avila-Rieger, 2022, Socioeconomic Status, Biological Aging, and Memory in a Diverse National Sample of Older US Men and Women, Neurology, 99, e2114, 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201032 · DOI
  86. Bautmans, 2022, WHO working definition of vitality capacity for healthy longevity monitoring, Lancet. Healthy Longev., 3, e789, 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00200-8 · DOI
  87. Moffitt, 2017, The Longitudinal Study of Aging in Human Young Adults: Knowledge Gaps and Research Agenda, J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., 72, 210, 10.1093/gerona/glw191 · DOI · Paper page
  88. Belsky, 2015, Quantification of biological aging in young adults, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, E4104, 10.1073/pnas.1506264112 · DOI · Paper page
  89. Miller, 2023, Aging Rate Indicators: Speedometers for Aging Research in Mice, Aging Biol., 1, 20230003, 10.59368/agingbio.20230003 · DOI
  90. Fontana, 2014, Medical research: Treat ageing, Nature, 511, 405, 10.1038/511405a · DOI
  91. Zhang, 2021, Mouse aging cell atlas analysis reveals global and cell type-specific aging signatures, Elife, 10, 10.7554/eLife.62293 · DOI
  92. Barrett, 2022, Susceptibility to hormone-mediated cancer is reflected by different tick rates of the epithelial and general epigenetic clock, Genome Biol., 23, 52, 10.1186/s13059-022-02603-3 · DOI
  93. Komaki, 2022, Evaluation of short-term epigenetic age fluctuation, Clin. Epigenetics, 14, 76, 10.1186/s13148-022-01293-9 · DOI
  94. Poganik, 2023, Biological age is increased by stress and restored upon recovery, Cell Metab., 35, 807, 10.1016/j.cmet.2023.03.015 · DOI · Paper page
  95. Shindyapina, 2022, Rapamycin treatment during development extends life span and health span of male mice and Daphnia magna, Sci. Adv., 8, 10.1126/sciadv.abo5482 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 736

Metadata

Authors
Moqri, M., Herzog, C., Poganik, J. R., Justice, J., Belsky, D. W., Higgins-Chen, A., Moskalev, A., Fuellen, G., Cohen, A. A., Bautmans, I., Widschwendter, M., Ding, J., Fleming, A., Mannick, J., Han, J.-D. J., Zhavoronkov, A., Barzilai, N., Kaeberlein, M., Cummings, S., Kennedy, B. K., Ferrucci, L., Horvath, S., Verdin, E., Maier, A. B., Snyder, M. P., Sebastiano, V., & Gladyshev, V. N.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
186
Issue
18
Pages
3758-3775
ISSN
0092-8674
DOI
10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.003
PMC
PMC11088934
Cited by
736
References
32
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review