Cited by 73Body Composition Measurement TechniquesObesity, Physical Activity, DietElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography

Bioelectrical impedance analysis to assess body composition in obese adult women: The effect of ethnicity

Jakicic, JM, Wing, RR, Lang, W·1998·International Journal of Obesity

Abstract

Objective To examine whether the accuracy of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) to estimate body composition in overweight women is affected by the ethnicity of the individuals. Design Cross-sectional design to compare body composition estimated by BIA to body composition measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), which was the reference method. Subjects One hundred twenty three overweight women participated in this study, of which 43 women were African-American (aged 37.2+/-5.6 y; BMI, 32.3+/-4.9 kg/m2) and 80 were Caucasian (aged 36.1+/-5.7 y; BMI, 31.9+/-3.5 kg/m2). Measurements Body composition was estimated from BIA using both a generalized and an obesity-specific equation. These estimations were compared to body composition measured by DEXA, which was the reference method. Results The generalized BIA equation underestimated lean body mass (LBM) by 2.6+/-3.1 kg in Caucasian women and 0.4+/-3.2 kg in African-American women, with the difference between the ethnic groups being significant (P < 0.001). The obesity-specific equation underestimated LBM in Caucasians by 0.9+/-3.1 kg and overestimated LBM in African-Americans by 1.2+/-2.8 kg (P < 0.001). An ethnic-specific equation is proposed, and cross-validation of this equation indicates that it provides a reasonable estimate of body composition in overweight women. Conclusions The accuracy of BIA to estimate body composition appears to be affected by the ethnicity of the individual. Therefore, an ethnic-specific equation for overweight women is proposed. However, further validation of this prediction model in an ethnically diverse population is necessary.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800576

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jakicic, J., Wing, R., & Lang, W.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Published
1998-03
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
243-249
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
OpenAlex
W2321125708
Cited by
73
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Keywords
bioelectrical impedance analysis, body composition, obesity, overweight women, ethnicity, African American women, white women, lean body mass
MeSH terms
Adult, Black or African American, Body Composition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review