The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generation of inheritable and “transgene clean” targeted genome-modified rice in later generations using the CRISPR/Cas9 system
Open accessAbstract
The CRISPR/Cas9 system is becoming an important genome editing tool for crop breeding. Although it has been demonstrated that target mutations can be transmitted to the next generation, their inheritance pattern has not yet been fully elucidated. Here, we describe the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing of four different rice genes with the help of online target-design tools. High-frequency mutagenesis and a large percentage of putative biallelic mutations were observed in T 0 generations. Nonetheless, our results also indicate that the progeny genotypes of biallelic T 0 lines are frequently difficult to predict and that the transmission of mutations largely does not conform to classical genetic laws, which suggests that the mutations in T 0 transgenic rice are mainly somatic mutations. Next, we followed the inheritance pattern of T 1 plants. Regardless of the presence of the CRISPR/Cas9 transgene, the mutations in T 1 lines were stably transmitted to later generations, indicating a standard germline transmission pattern. Off-target effects were also evaluated and our results indicate that with careful target selection, off-target mutations are rare in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated rice gene editing. Taken together, our results indicate the promising production of inheritable and “transgene clean” targeted genome-modified rice in the T 1 generation using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases
Hsu, P. D., Scott, D. A., Weinstein, J. A., Ran, F. A., Konermann, S., Agarwala, V., Li, Y., Fine, E. J., Wu, X., Shalem, O., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2647 · Cited by 4,741
Wang, H., Yang, H., Shivalila, C. S., Dawlaty, M. M., Cheng, A. W., Zhang, F., & Jaenisch, R. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.025 · Cited by 3,495
High-Frequency off-Target Mutagenesis Induced by CRISPR-Cas Nucleases in Human Cells
Fu, Y., Foden, J. A., Khayter, C., Maeder, M. L., Reyon, D., Joung, J. K., & Sander, J. D. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2623 · Cited by 3,292
Mali, P., Aach, J., Stranges, P. B., Esvelt, K. M., Moosburner, M., Kosuri, S., Yang, L., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2675 · Cited by 1,752
Pattanayak, V., Lin, S., Guilinger, J. P., Ma, E., Doudna, J. A., & Liu, D. R. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2673 · Cited by 1,487
Heritable genome editing in C. elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system
Friedland, A. E., Tzur, Y. B., Esvelt, K. M., Colaiácovo, M. P., Church, G. M., & Calarco, J. A. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2532 · Cited by 899
Cited by
Development of broad virus resistance in non‐transgenic cucumber using CRISPR/Cas9 technology
Chandrasekaran, J., Brumin, M., Wolf, D., Leibman, D., Klap, C., Pearlsman, M., Sherman, A., Arazi, T., & Gal‐On, A. (2016) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/mpp.12375 · Cited by 823
Wang, F., Wang, C., Liu, P., Lei, C., Hao, W., Gao, Y., Liu, Y.-G., & Zhao, K. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154027 · Cited by 819
Peng, A., Chen, S., Lei, T., Xu, L., He, Y., Wu, L., Yao, L., & Zou, X. (2017) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12733 · Cited by 731
Lawrenson, T., Shorinola, O., Stacey, N., Li, C., Østergaard, L., Patron, N., Uauy, C., & Harwood, W. (2015) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0826-7 · Cited by 551
Pan, C., Ye, L., Qin, L., Liu, X., He, Y., Wang, J., Chen, L., & Lu, G. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep24765 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, R.-F., Li, H., Qin, R.-Y., Li, J., Qiu, C.-H., Yang, Y.-C., Ma, H., Li, L., Wei, P.-C., & Yang, J.-B.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2015-06-19
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11491-11491
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2287494390
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 11.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
