The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of broad virus resistance in non‐transgenic cucumber using CRISPR/Cas9 technology
Abstract
Summary: Genome editing in plants has been boosted tremendously by the development of CRISPR/Cas9 (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) technology. This powerful tool allows substantial improvement in plant traits in addition to those provided by classical breeding. Here, we demonstrate the development of virus resistance in cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) using Cas9/subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) technology to disrupt the function of the recessive eIF4E ( eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E ) gene. Cas9/sgRNA constructs were targeted to the N′ and C′ termini of the eIF4E gene. Small deletions and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were observed in the eIF4E gene targeted sites of transformed T1 generation cucumber plants, but not in putative off‐target sites. Non‐transgenic heterozygous eif4e mutant plants were selected for the production of non‐transgenic homozygous T3 generation plants. Homozygous T3 progeny following Cas9/sgRNA that had been targeted to both eif4e sites exhibited immunity to Cucumber vein yellowing virus ( Ipomovirus ) infection and resistance to the potyviruses Zucchini yellow mosaic virus and Papaya ring spot mosaic virus‐W . In contrast, heterozygous mutant and non‐mutant plants were highly susceptible to these viruses. For the first time, virus resistance has been developed in cucumber, non‐transgenically, not visibly affecting plant development and without long‐term backcrossing, via a new technology that can be expected to be applicable to a wide range of crop plants.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CRISPR has been used to develop cucumbers with broad virus resistance without affecting plant development.
“researchers developing cucumbers with broad virus resistance without affecting plant development [180]”
From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [180]
Citations
Cites
High-Frequency off-Target Mutagenesis Induced by CRISPR-Cas Nucleases in Human Cells
Fu, Y., Foden, J. A., Khayter, C., Maeder, M. L., Reyon, D., Joung, J. K., & Sander, J. D. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2623 · Cited by 3,292
Mali, P., Aach, J., Stranges, P. B., Esvelt, K. M., Moosburner, M., Kosuri, S., Yang, L., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2675 · Cited by 1,752 · cited 1×
“Each target sequence of 20 nucleotides was designed according to the criteria described previously (Mali et al., 2013) upstream of the NGG trinucleotide, known as the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM).”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 56
- 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00513.x · DOI
- 10.1186/s13059-015-0799-6 · DOI
- 10.1094/MPMI-19-0557 · DOI
- 10.1038/nplants.2015.145 · DOI
- 10.1186/1746-4811-9-39 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.11.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.12.006 · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.114.247577 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-801246-8.00002-0 · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.107.106104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02712670 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2004.00223.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01481.x · DOI
- 10.1038/cr.2013.114 · DOI
- 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.5.467 · DOI
- 10.1099/0022-1317-73-9-2183 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11248-004-3802-7 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10658-009-9468-5 · DOI
- 10.1099/vir.0.81659-0 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10059-009-0042-y · DOI
- 10.1038/nrm2838 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12896-015-0131-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.coviro.2011.09.010 · DOI
- 10.1038/NPLANTS.2014.11 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.011205.141140 · DOI
- 10.1093/mp/ssu044 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00898-9 · DOI
- 10.1128/JVI.74.17.7730-7737.2000 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.2654 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-009-1169-0 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11103-014-0188-7 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10658-004-2491-7 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00386.x · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0029595 · DOI
- 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.3.322 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0702739104 · DOI
- 10.1094/MPMI-11-09-0277 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.2655 · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.102.017855 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0011313 · DOI
- 10.1111/ppa.12260 · DOI
- 10.1016/bs.aivir.2014.11.006 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00633825 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00785.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01499.x · DOI
- 10.1099/vir.0.81817-0 · DOI
- 10.1128/JVI.77.18.9906-9911.2003 · DOI
- 10.3390/v7072778 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.12.086 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature13011 · DOI · Paper page
- Truniger V., 2009, Advances in Virus Research, 119
- 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00791.x · DOI
- 10.1006/viro.1997.8634 · DOI
- 10.1093/mp/ssu009 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep11491 · DOI
- 10.1111/pbi.12200 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Applications of CRISPR–Cas in agriculture and plant biotechnology
Zhu, H., Li, C., & Gao, C. (2020) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-00288-9 · Cited by 870
CRISPR/Cas system: recent advances and future prospects for genome editing
Manghwar, H., Lindsey, K., Zhang, X., & Jin, S. (2019) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2019.09.006 · Cited by 529
“the crucial role in the Potyviridae life cycle [66]”
BackgroundCRISPR/Cas: A powerful tool for gene function study and crop improvement
Zhang, D., Zhang, Z., Unver, T., & Zhang, B. (2021) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2020.10.003 · Cited by 373
Zaidi, S. S.-E.-A., Mahas, A., Vanderschuren, H., & Mahfouz, M. M. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02204-y · Cited by 221
The CRISPR/Cas9 system and its applications in crop genome editing
Bao, A., Burritt, D. J., Chen, H., Zhou, X., Cao, D., & Tran, L.-S. P. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/07388551.2018.1554621 · Cited by 185
Loureiro, A., & da Silva, G. J. (2019) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics8010018 · Cited by 129
New traits in crops produced by genome editing techniques based on deletions
van de Wiel, C. C. M., Schaart, J. G., Lotz, L. A. P., & Smulders, M. J. M. (2017) · Plant Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11816-017-0425-z · Cited by 80
Genetic Variation and Unintended Risk in the Context of Old and New Breeding Techniques
Singer, S. D., Laurie, J. D., Bilichak, A., Kumar, S., & Singh, J. (2021) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689.2021.1883826 · Cited by 77
Concerns regarding ‘off-target’activity of genome editing endonucleases
Kadam, U. S., Shelake, R. M., Chavhan, R. L., & Suprasanna, P. (2018) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.03.027 · Cited by 47
Tariq, A., Mushtaq, M., Yaqoob, H., Bhat, B. A., Zargar, S. M., Raza, A., Ali, S., Charagh, S., Mubarik, M. S., Zaman, Q. U., et al. (2023) · GM Crops & Food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2023.2219111 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Chandrasekaran, J., Brumin, M., Wolf, D., Leibman, D., Klap, C., Pearlsman, M., Sherman, A., Arazi, T., & Gal‐On, A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Research ARO, Volcani Center Bet‐Dagan 50250 Israel
- Department of Vegetable Research ARO, Volcani Center Bet‐Dagan 50250 Israel
- Department of Fruit Tree Sciences ARO, Volcani Center Bet‐Dagan 50250 Israel
- Department of Ornamental Plants and Agricultural Biotechnology ARO, Volcani Center Bet‐Dagan 50250 Israel
- Venue
- Molecular Plant Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-04-21
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1140-1153
- ISSN
- 1464-6722
- 1364-3703
- Cited by
- 823
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review