Cited by 94DNA Repair MechanismsSkin Protection and AgingCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

The specificity of UVA-induced DNA damage in human melanocytes

Mouret, Stéphane, Forestier, Anne, Douki, Thierry·2012·Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences

Abstract

Exposure to solar UV radiation is the origin of most skin cancers, including deadly melanomas. Melanomas are quite different from keratinocyte-derived tumours and exhibit a different mutation spectrum in the activated oncogenes, possibly arising from a different class of DNA damage. In addition, some data suggest a role for UVA radiation in melanomagenesis. To get further insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying induction of melanoma, we quantified a series of UV-induced DNA damage in primary cultures of normal human melanocytes. The results were compared with those obtained in keratinocytes from the same donors. In the UVB range, the frequency and the distribution of pyrimidine dimers was the same in melanocytes and keratinocytes. UVA was also found to produce thymine cyclobutane dimer as the major DNA lesion with an equal efficiency in both cell types. In contrast, following UVA-irradiation a large difference was found for the yield of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine; the level of this product was 2.2-fold higher in melanocytes than in keratinocytes. The comet assay showed that the induction of strand breaks was equally efficient in both cell types but that the yield of Fpg-sensitive sites was larger in melanocytes. Our data show that, upon UVA irradiation, oxidative lesions contribute to a larger extent to DNA damage in melanocytes than in keratinocytes. We also observed that the basal level of oxidative lesions was higher in the melanocytes, in agreement with a higher oxidative stress that may be due to the production of melanin. The bulk of these results, combined with qPCR and cell survival data, may explain some of the differences in mutation spectrum and target genes between melanomas and carcinomas arising from keratinocytes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c1pp05185g

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mouret, S., Forestier, A., & Douki, T.
Affiliations
Université Joseph Fourier (FR)
Corresponding author
Douki, Thierry
Venue
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences
Published
2012-11
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
155-162
ISSN
  • 1474-905X (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-9092
OpenAlex
W2045626886
Cited by
94
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-07-PCVI-0004)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Keywords
UVA, DNA damage, melanocytes, keratinocytes, melanoma, melanomagenesis, 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, oxidative DNA damage, strand breaks, Fpg-sensitive sites, pyrimidine dimers, oxidative stress, melanin, mutation spectrum, skin cancer
MeSH terms
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, DNA, DNA Damage, Humans, Melanocytes, Pyrimidine Dimers, Ultraviolet Rays, Comet Assay, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review