Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,153

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 181 of the 181 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Three dimensional macroporous architectures and aerogels built of carbon nanotubes and/or graphene: synthesis and applications

Nardecchia, Stefania, Carriazo, Daniel, Ferrer, M. Luisa, Gutiérrez, María C., del Monte, Francisco·2013·Chem. Soc. Rev.
DOI 10.1039/c2cs35353a
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes and graphene are some of the most intensively explored carbon allotropes in materials science. This interest mainly resides in their unique properties with electrical conductivities as high as 10(4) S cm(-1), thermal conductivities as high as 5000 W m(-1) K and superior mechanical properties with elastic moduli on the order of 1 TPa for both of them. The possibility to translate the individual properties of these monodimensional (e.g. carbon nanotubes) and bidimensional (e.g. graphene) building units into two-dimensional free-standing thick and thin films has paved the way for using these allotropes in a number of applications (including photocatalysis, electrochemistry, electronics and optoelectronics, among others) as well as for the preparation of biological and chemical sensors. More recently and while recognizing the tremendous interest of these two-dimensional structures, researchers are noticing that the performance of certain devices can experience a significant enhancement by the use of three-dimensional architectures and/or aerogels because of the increase of active material per projected area. This is obviously the case as long as the nanometre-sized building units remain accessible so that the concept of hierarchical three-dimensional organization is critical to guarantee the mass transport and, as consequence, performance enhancement. Thus, this review aims to describe the different synthetic processes used for preparation of these three-dimensional architectures and/or aerogels containing either any or both allotropes, and the different fields of application in which the particular structure of these materials provided a significant enhancement in the efficacy as compared to their two-dimensional analogues or even opened the path to novel applications. The unprecedented compilation of information from both CNT- and graphene-based three-dimensional architectures and/or aerogels in a single revision is also of interest because it allows a straightforward comparison between the particular features provided by each allotrope.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c2cs35353a

Cites

181 of 181 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Rieux, 2005, J. Sep. Sci., 28, 1628, 10.1002/jssc.200500146 · doi:10.1002/jssc.200500146
  2. Miyabe, 2004, J. Sep. Sci., 27, 853, 10.1002/jssc.200401772 · doi:10.1002/jssc.200401772
  3. Nakanishi, 1991, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 134, 39, 10.1016/0022-3093(91)90009-U · doi:10.1016/0022-3093(91)90009-u
  4. Nakanishi, 1992, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 147–148, 291, 10.1016/S0022-3093(05)80632-5 · doi:10.1016/s0022-3093(05)80632-5
  5. Minakuchi, 1996, Anal. Chem., 68, 3498, 10.1021/ac960281m · DOI · Paper page
  6. Lukens, 2002, Chem. Mater., 14, 1665, 10.1021/cm010904z · doi:10.1021/cm010904z
  7. Dunn, 2007, Acc. Chem. Res., 40, 874, 10.1021/ar600033s · DOI · Paper page
  8. Xu, 2006, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 128, 6560, 10.1021/ja060944+ · doi:10.1021/ja060944+
  9. Duggal, 2006, Adv. Mater., 18, 29, 10.1002/adma.200500625 · doi:10.1002/adma.200500625
  10. Wei, 2006, Nano Lett., 6, 186, 10.1021/nl051955o · doi:10.1021/nl051955o
  11. Zhu, 2006, Nano Lett., 6, 243, 10.1021/nl052183z · doi:10.1021/nl052183z
  12. Yan, 2008, Small, 3, 24, 10.1002/smll.200600354 · doi:10.1002/smll.200600354
  13. Roy, 2012, RSC Adv., 2, 2105, 10.1039/c2ra00763k · doi:10.1039/c2ra00763k
  14. Lascialfari, 2011, Soft Matter, 7, 10660, 10.1039/c1sm06017a · doi:10.1039/c1sm06017a
  15. Ostojic, 2012, ChemPhysChem, 13, 2102, 10.1002/cphc.201100970 · doi:10.1002/cphc.201100970
  16. Duque, 2011, ACS Nano, 5, 6686, 10.1021/nn202225k · doi:10.1021/nn202225k
  17. Lu, 2012, Appl. Catal., B, 111–112, 492, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.11.001 · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.11.001
  18. Talapatra, 2006, Nat. Nanotechnol., 1, 112, 10.1038/nnano.2006.56 · doi:10.1038/nnano.2006.56
  19. Jung, 2006, Nano Lett., 6, 413, 10.1021/nl052238x · DOI · Paper page
  20. Li, 2012, Nano Res., 5, 265, 10.1007/s12274-012-0206-5 · doi:10.1007/s12274-012-0206-5
  21. Sherrell, 2012, ChemSusChem, 5, 1233, 10.1002/cssc.201100667 · doi:10.1002/cssc.201100667
  22. Huang, 2012, Soft Matter, 8, 4609, 10.1039/c2sm25090j · doi:10.1039/c2sm25090j
  23. Zhu, 2012, Adv. Funct. Mater., 22, 4017, 10.1002/adfm.201201020 · doi:10.1002/adfm.201201020
  24. Lv, 2011, J. Mater. Chem., 21, 12352, 10.1039/c1jm11728a · doi:10.1039/c1jm11728a
  25. Yavari, 2011, Sci. Rep., 1
  26. Dong, 2012, Mater. Chem. Phys., 134, 576, 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.03.066 · doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.03.066
  27. Luo, 2012, J. Mater. Chem., 22, 12993, 10.1039/c2jm30819c · doi:10.1039/c2jm30819c
  28. Sherigara, 2003, Electroanalysis, 15, 753, 10.1002/elan.200390094 · doi:10.1002/elan.200390094
  29. Lee, 2012, ACS Nano, 6, 2978, 10.1021/nn300684d · doi:10.1021/nn300684d
  30. Qian, 2002, Langmuir, 18, 4526, 10.1021/la0118199 · doi:10.1021/la0118199
  31. Wang, 2005, Adv. Funct. Mater., 15, 1267, 10.1002/adfm.200500048 · doi:10.1002/adfm.200500048
  32. Walcarius, 2012, TrAC, 38, 79

Cited by

See all 1,153

Metadata

Authors
Nardecchia, S., Carriazo, D., Ferrer, M. L., Gutiérrez, M. C., & del Monte, F.
Venue
Chem. Soc. Rev.
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2013
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
794-830
ISSN
  • 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4744
DOI
10.1039/c2cs35353a
OpenAlex
W2034842950
Cited by
1,153
References
181
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.