Cited by 28Skin Protection and AgingMedicinal Plant ResearchPlant chemical constituents analysis

A natural broad-spectrum sunscreen formulated from the dried extract of Brazilian Lippia sericea as a single UV filter

Polonini, H. C., Brandão, M. A. F., Raposo, N. R. B.·2014·RSC Adv.

Abstract

The photoprotective activity of some Lippia species is described for the first time, in terms of UVA and UVB protection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c4ra11577e

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extracts of Lippia sericea, Cecropia obtusa, Acacia catechu, Brazilian bamboo, and Lasallia pustulata have high SPF values in formulations (SPF = 7-86), with Brazilian bamboo most promising at SPF 44 after irradiation.

    “The other extracts revealed to possess a complex mixture of compounds, namely a high content of phenols [102,105] and polyphenols [103] and high SPF values in formulations (SPF = 7–86) [102,103,104,105,106], being the extract of Brazilian bamboo species the most promising with a SPF value of 44, after irradiation [105].”

    From UV Filters: Challenges and Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [102]

  • A greater number of phenolic constituents in extracts is related to antioxidant activity.

    “Furthermore, a relation between the presence of a greater number of phenolic constituents in the extracts and the antioxidant activity was detected [102,103,104].”

    From UV Filters: Challenges and Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [102]

  • Extracts of Lippia sericea, Cecropia obtusa, Acacia catechu heartwood, Brazilian bamboo species, and Lasallia pustulata have antioxidant and photoprotective activities.

    “Extracts of Brazilian Lippia sericea [102], Amazonian Cecropia obtusa [103], Acacia catechu heartwood [104], Brazilian bamboo species [105], and Lasallia pustulata [106] were also reported for their antioxidant and photoprotective activities.”

    From UV Filters: Challenges and Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [102]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Polonini, H. C., Brandão, M. A. F., & Raposo, N. R. B.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR)
Corresponding author
  • Polonini, H. C.
  • Brandão, M. A. F.
  • Raposo, N. R. B.
Venue
RSC Adv.
Published
2014
Volume
4
Issue
107
Pages
62566-62575
ISSN
2046-2069 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065423363
Cited by
28
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
RSC Advances (publishedVersion)
Funders
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant chemical constituents analysis
Keywords
natural sunscreen, broad-spectrum UV protection, UVA protection, UVB protection, photoprotection, dried plant extract, Brazilian medicinal plants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review