CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 995

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification methods in microplastic analysis: a review

Shim, Won Joon, Hong, Sang Hee, Eo, Soeun Eo·2017·Analytical Methods
DOI 10.1039/c6ay02558g
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Microplastics have become a major global environmental issue in recent decades due to their ubiquity in the oceans, bioavailability and ability to carry toxic chemicals.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c6ay02558g

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. GESAMP , in Sources, Fate and Effects of Microplastics in the Marine Environment: a Global Assessment (Rep. Stud. GESAMP No. 90), ed. P. J. Kershaw, (IMO/FAO/UNESCO_IOC/UNIDO/WMO/IAEA/UN/UNEP/UNDP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection), 2015, p. 96
  2. Shim, 2015, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 69, 265, 10.1007/s00244-015-0216-x · DOI
  3. Kang, 2015, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 96, 304, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.04.054 · DOI
  4. Eriksen, 2014, PLoS One, 9, e111913, 10.1371/journal.pone.0111913 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Law, 2010, Science, 329, 1185, 10.1126/science.1192321 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Obbard, 2014, Earth's Future, 2, 315, 10.1002/2014EF000240 · DOI
  7. Boerger, 2010, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 60, 2275, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.08.007 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Murray, 2011, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 62, 1207, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.03.032 · DOI
  9. van Franeker, 2011, Environ. Pollut., 159, 2609, 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.06.008 · DOI
  10. De Witte, 2014, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 85, 146, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.06.006 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Van Cauwenberghe, 2014, Environ. Pollut., 193, 65, 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.06.010 · DOI
  12. McDermid, 2004, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 48, 790, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2003.10.017 · DOI
  13. Heo, 2013, Ocean Sci. J., 48, 225, 10.1007/s12601-013-0019-9 · DOI
  14. Canesi, 2015, Mar. Environ. Res., 111, 34, 10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.06.008 · DOI
  15. Gregory, 1977, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 8, 82, 10.1016/0025-326X(77)90193-X · DOI
  16. Carpenter, 1972, Science, 178, 749, 10.1126/science.178.4062.749 · DOI
  17. Hidalgo-Ruz, 2013, Mar. Environ. Res., 87–88, 12, 10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.02.015 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Desforges, 2014, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 79, 94, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.12.035 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Laglbauer, 2014, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 89, 356, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.09.036 · DOI
  20. Mathalon, 2014, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 81, 69, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.02.018 · DOI
  21. Kang, 2015, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 69, 340, 10.1007/s00244-015-0210-3 · DOI
  22. Nel, 2015, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 101, 274, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.043 · DOI
  23. Song, 2015, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 93, 202, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.01.015 · DOI
  24. Eriksen, 2013, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 68, 71, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.12.021 · DOI
  25. M. G. C. Löder and G.Gerdts, in Marine Anthropogenic Litter, eds. M. Bergmann, L Gutow and M. Klages, Springer, London, 2015. ch. 8 (methodology used for detection and identification of microplastics-a critical appraisal), p. 447
  26. Lusher, 2013, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 67, 94, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.11.028 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Vianello, 2013, Estuar., Coastal Shelf Sci., 130, 54, 10.1016/j.ecss.2013.03.022 · DOI
  28. Turner, 2011, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 62, 377, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.09.027 · DOI
  29. Ugolini, 2013, Estuar., Coastal Shelf Sci., 129, 19, 10.1016/j.ecss.2013.05.026 · DOI
  30. Ng, 2006, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 52, 761, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.11.017 · DOI
  31. Song, 2015, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 69, 279, 10.1007/s00244-015-0209-9 · DOI
  32. Tagg, 2015, Anal. Chem., 87, 6032, 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00495 · DOI
  33. Cole, 2013, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 6646, 10.1021/es400663f · DOI · Paper page
  34. Castañeda, 2014, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 71, 1767, 10.1139/cjfas-2014-0281 · DOI
  35. Majewsky, 2016, Sci. Total Environ., 568, 507, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.017 · DOI
  36. Dümichen, 2015, Water Res., 85, 451, 10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.002 · DOI
  37. Tsukame, 1997, Thermochim. Acta, 299, 27, 10.1016/S0040-6031(97)00132-9 · DOI
  38. Fabbri, 2000, Anal. Chim. Acta, 413, 3, 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)00766-2 · DOI
  39. Fabbri, 2001, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 58–59, 361, 10.1016/S0165-2370(00)00170-4 · DOI
  40. Fries, 2013, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 15, 1949
  41. Nuelle, 2014, Environ. Pollut., 184, 161, 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.07.027 · DOI
  42. Dekiff, 2014, Environ. Pollut., 186, 248, 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.11.019 · DOI
  43. Dazzi, 2015, Int. J. Pharm., 484, 109, 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.02.046 · DOI
  44. Dazzi, 2012, Appl. Spectrosc., 66, 1365, 10.1366/12-06804 · DOI
  45. Kinnunen, 2015, Int. J. Pharm., 478, 53, 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.11.019 · DOI
  46. Andrady, 2011, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 62, 1596, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Jee, 2009, Chem. Phys. Lett., 477, 112, 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.06.088 · DOI
  48. Greenspan, 1985, J. Cell Biol., 100, 965, 10.1083/jcb.100.3.965 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Shim, 2016, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.10.049 · DOI
  50. Rocha-Santos, 2015, Trends Anal. Chem., 65, 47, 10.1016/j.trac.2014.10.011 · DOI
  51. Qiu, 2016, Estuar., Coastal Shelf Sci., 176, 102, 10.1016/j.ecss.2016.04.012 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 995

Metadata

Authors
Shim, W. J., Hong, S. H., & Eo, S. E.
Affiliations
Oil and POPs Research Laboratory
Venue
Analytical Methods
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2017
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
1384-1391
ISSN
  • 1759-9660
  • 1759-9679
DOI
10.1039/c6ay02558g
Cited by
995
References
11
Language
en
Funders
Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification methods in microplastic analysis: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c6ay02558g
The paper
Shim, W. J., Hong, S. H., & Eo, S. E. (2017). Identification methods in microplastic analysis: a review. Analytical Methods. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ay02558g