Cited by 643Microplastics and Plastic PollutionPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Review of micro- and nanoplastic contamination in the food chain

Open access
Toussaint, Brigitte, Raffael, Barbara, Angers-Loustau, Alexandre, Gilliland, Douglas, Kestens, Vikram, Petrillo, Mauro, Rio-Echevarria, Iria M., Van den Eede, Guy·2019·Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A

Abstract

Whereas the dramatic environmental impact of plastic waste rightfully receives considerable attention by scientists, policy makers and public in general, the human health impact of micro- and nanoplastics contamination of our food and beverages remains largely unknown. Indeed, most studies aim at understanding the environmental impact rather than the human health impact of a possible exposure to micro- and nanoplastics. In addition, these papers generally lack a methodological, standardised approach. Furthermore, some studies focus on the damage to and contamination level of animal species collected from the wild environment, and others investigate the rate and biology of microplastic uptake of animals fed with microplastics in laboratory. This review aims at understanding human exposure. Since there is, with few exceptions, no evidence available on the presence of micro- and nanoplastics in a normal diet, this study takes an indirect approach and analyses peer-reviewed publications since 2010 that document the presence of micro- and nanoplastics in those animals (more than 200 species) and food products that are part of the human food chain and that may thus contribute directly or indirectly to the uptake of micro- and nanoplastics via the human diet. It also addresses the question of the definitions, the methodologies and the quality criteria applied to obtain the reported results. This review suggests that, beyond a few estimations and comparisons, precise data to assess the exact exposure of humans to micro- and nanoplastics through their diet cannot be produced until standardised methods and definitions are available.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19440049.2019.1583381

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PMD is ingested by several marine organisms, including commercially important species.

    “PMD is also ingested by several marine organisms, including commercially important species.18,19,[87][88][89][90]”
  • Nanoplastics have high surface to volume ratios and thus better adsorb toxic compounds and potentially transfer them to organisms after ingestion.

    “Nanoplastics are characterised by high surface to volume ratios and thus better adsorb toxic compounds and potentially transfers them to organisms aer ingestion.16,18,137,[147][148][149]”
  • There are three entryways for human exposure: via the lungs, contact with the skin, and ingestion (e.g. with marine food).

    “There are three entryways: via the lungs, contact with the skin and ingestion (e.g. with marine food).18,160”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Arthur C, Bamford H, Baker J (2009). Proceedings of the international research workshop on the occurrence, effects and fate of microplastic marine debris, 9-1, 2008. Tacoma (WA): University of Washington Tacoma; NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS-OR&R-30.
  2. European Commission 2017. Commission Decision of 17 May 2017 on laying down criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of marine waters and specifications and standardised methods for monitoring and assessment, and repealing Decision 20170/477/EU. Official Journal of the European Union, 2017/848/EU.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toussaint, B., Raffael, B., Angers-Loustau, A., Gilliland, D., Kestens, V., Petrillo, M., Rio-Echevarria, I. M., & Van den Eede, G.
Affiliations
  • European Commission (BE)
  • European Commission, Directorate-General Joint Research Centre, Geel, Belgium
Corresponding author
Toussaint, Brigitte
Venue
Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A
Published
2019-04-15
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
639-673
ISSN
  • 1944-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-0057
OpenAlex
W2939196136
Cited by
643
References
125
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 98 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 103 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 7
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Additives & Contaminants Part A (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Flanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
microplastics, nanoplastics, food chain, human dietary exposure, food contamination, animal studies, plastic waste, exposure assessment
MeSH terms
Animals, Food Contamination, Food Supply, Humans, Plastics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review