Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,083

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 326 of the 326 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Covalent organic frameworks: an ideal platform for designing ordered materials and advanced applications

Open access
Liu, Ruoyang, Tan, Ke Tian, Gong, Yifan, Chen, Yongzhi, Li, Zhuoer, Xie, Shuailei, He, Ting, Lu, Zhen, Yang, Hao, Jiang, Donglin·2021·Chemical Society Reviews

Abstract

Covalent organic frameworks offer a molecular platform for integrating organic units into periodically ordered yet extended 2D and 3D polymers to create topologically well-defined polygonal lattices and built-in discrete micropores and/or mesopores.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d0cs00620c

Cites

326 of 326 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–326 of 326

Cited by

See all 1,083

Metadata

Authors
Liu, R., Tan, K. T., Gong, Y., Chen, Y., Li, Z., Xie, S., He, T., Lu, Z., Yang, H., & Jiang, D.
Venue
Chemical Society Reviews
Published
2021
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
120-242
ISSN
  • 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4744
OpenAlex
W3111457036
Cited by
1,083
References
326
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.