Cited by 77Polymer crystallization and propertiesWaste Management and RecyclingMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution

Recent development of end-of-life strategies for plastic in industry and academia: bridging their gap for future deployment

Open access
Zheng, Jackie, Arifuzzaman, Md, Tang, Xiaomin, Chen, Xi Chelsea, Saito, Tomonori·2023·Materials Horizons

Abstract

Bridging the gap between academia and industry in plastic recycling will accelerate innovation and deployment toward solving the global challenge of plastic waste management and establishing net zero carbon society.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d2mh01549h

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mechanical recycling faces bottlenecks of low separation efficiency for complex mixtures and insufficient purity of recycled pellets.

    “However, this approach faces several bottlenecks: low separation efficiency for complex mixtures and insufficient purity of the recycled pellets.”

    From Functional carbon materials from waste plastics: synthesis and applications (2025) · cites this paper as [12]

    Sections 2.4.1 and 4.1 describe mixed plastics as difficult to separate mechanically and say mechanical recycling generally requires a high-percentage, single-polymer feedstock. Section 2.2.1 describes clean, sorted flakes being extruded into pellets, but does not say the resulting pellets have insufficient purity. The pellet-purity bottleneck is therefore not established by this copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. PureCycle Technologies Provides Third Quarter 2022 Update, https://ir.purecycle.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/62/ purecycle-technologies-provides-third-quarter-2022-update, (accessed 15 December 2022).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, J., Arifuzzaman, M., Tang, X., Chen, X. C., & Saito, T.
Affiliations
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Xi Chelsea
  • Saito, Tomonori
Venue
Materials Horizons
Published
2023
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
1608-1624
ISSN
  • 2051-6347 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-6355
OpenAlex
W4362657618
Cited by
73
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 5
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Materials Horizons (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (Office of Science, Materials Sciences and Engineer)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Laboratory Directed Research and Development Progr)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Keywords
plastic waste management, plastic recycling, mechanical recycling, compatibilizer, plastic sorting, circular economy, closed-loop recycling, university-industry collaboration, carbon footprint reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review