Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment for catalytic fast pyrolysis of mixed plastic waste

Yadav, Geetanjali, Singh, Avantika, Dutta, Abhijit, Uekert, Taylor, DesVeaux, Jason S., Nicholson, Scott R., Tan, Eric C.D., Mukarakate, Calvin, Schaidle, Joshua A., Wrasman, Cody J., Carpenter, Alberta C., Baldwin, Robert M., Román-Leshkov, Yuriy, Beckham, Gregg T.·2023·Energy & Environmental Science

Abstract

This study analyzes catalytic fast pyrolysis as a conversion technology for mixed plastic waste, highlighting key economic and environmental drivers and potential opportunities for process improvements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d3ee00749a

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rigorous process-level techno-economic analyses remain comparatively scarce, particularly for small- and community-scale systems intended for deployment in resource-constrained settings.

    “rigorous process-level techno-economic analyses (TEAs) remain comparatively scarce, particularly for small-and community-scale systems intended for deployment in resourceconstrained settings”

    From Integrated Techno-Economic, Environmental Screening, and Social Return on Investment Analysis of Community-Scale Sawdust–Polypropylene Co-Pyrolysis for Heavy-Metal Adsorbent Production in Rural Area, Thailand (2026) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that, despite several existing analyses of plastic-pyrolysis refineries, a comprehensive, transparent TEA and LCA of mixed-plastic-waste pyrolysis is needed. That supports a gap in this specific literature, but the paper does not establish a broader scarcity of process-level TEAs, particularly for small- or community-scale systems in resource-constrained settings. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. Borrelle, 2020, Science, 369, 1515, 10.1126/science.aba3656 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Law, 2021, Nat. Rev. Mater., 7, 104, 10.1038/s41578-021-00382-0 · DOI
  3. E.Ormonde , M.DeGuzman , M.Yoneyama , U.Loechner and X.Zhu , Plastics Recycling - Chemical Economics Handbook , IHS Markit , 2019 , https://ihsmarkit.com/products/plastics-recycling-chemical-economicshandbook.html.)
  4. Kusenberg, 2022, Waste Manage., 138, 83, 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.11.009 · DOI
  5. Rahimi, 2017, Nat. Rev. Chem., 1, 0046, 10.1038/s41570-017-0046 · DOI
  6. Coates, 2020, Nat. Rev. Mater., 5, 501, 10.1038/s41578-020-0190-4 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Ellis, 2021, Nat. Catal., 4, 539, 10.1038/s41929-021-00648-4 · DOI
  8. Kosloski-Oh, 2021, Mater. Horiz., 8, 1084, 10.1039/D0MH01286F · DOI
  9. Martín, 2021, Chem, 7, 1487, 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.12.006 · DOI
  10. Solis, 2020, Waste Manage., 105, 128, 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.01.038 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Zeller, 2021, Chem. Ing. Tech., 93, 1763, 10.1002/cite.202100102 · DOI
  12. Vispute, 2010, Science, 330, 1222, 10.1126/science.1194218 · DOI
  13. Orozco, 2021, ChemSusChem, 14, 4291, 10.1002/cssc.202100889 · DOI
  14. Bora, 2020, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 8, 16350, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06311 · DOI
  15. Dogu, 2021, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 84, 100901
  16. Anuar Sharuddin, 2016, Energy Convers. Manage., 115, 308, 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.037 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Nicholson, 2022, Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng., 13, 301, 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-100521-085846 · DOI
  18. Diaz-Silvarrey, 2018, Green Chem., 20, 1813, 10.1039/C7GC03662K · DOI
  19. Marcilla, 2008, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47, 6896, 10.1021/ie800520u · DOI
  20. Lee, 2007, Waste Manage., 27, 168, 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.12.017 · DOI
  21. Lopez, 2011, Chem. Eng. J., 173, 62, 10.1016/j.cej.2011.07.037 · DOI
  22. Singh, 2019, J. Energy Inst., 92, 1647, 10.1016/j.joei.2019.01.009 · DOI
  23. Sasse, 1998, Chem. Eng. Technol., 21, 777, 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4125(199810)21:10<777::AID-CEAT777>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI
  24. Mark, 2020, ChemSusChem, 13, 5808, 10.1002/cssc.202001905 · DOI
  25. Sun, 2020, J. Cleaner Prod., 268, 122038, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122038 · DOI
  26. Kusenberg, 2022, Fuel Process. Technol., 227, 107090, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.107090 · DOI
  27. Wang, 2022, ACS Omega, 7, 2752, 10.1021/acsomega.1c05401 · DOI
  28. Cho, 2010, Energy Fuels, 24, 1389, 10.1021/ef901127v · DOI
  29. Eschenbacher, 2022, Chem. Eng. J., 428, 132087, 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132087 · DOI
  30. Elordi, 2012, Appl. Catal., A, 415, 89, 10.1016/j.apcata.2011.12.011 · DOI
  31. Inayat, 2022, Fuel, 314, 123071, 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.123071 · DOI
  32. P. T.Williams , Feedstock recycling and pyrolysis of waste plastics: converting waste plastics into diesel and other fuels , 2006 , pp. 285–313 · DOI
  33. Miskolczi, 2006, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 91, 517, 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.01.056 · DOI
  34. Ding, 1997, Fuel Process. Technol., 51, 47, 10.1016/S0378-3820(96)01080-6 · DOI
  35. Toraman, 2014, J. Chromatogr. A, 1359, 237, 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.07.017 · DOI
  36. Kaminsky, 1995, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 32, 19, 10.1016/0165-2370(94)00830-T · DOI
  37. Artetxe, 2012, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51, 13915, 10.1021/ie300178e · DOI
  38. Simon, 1996, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 38, 75, 10.1016/S0165-2370(96)00950-3 · DOI
  39. Miandad, 2019, Front. Energy Res., 7, 27, 10.3389/fenrg.2019.00027 · DOI
  40. Zhao, 2021, AIChE J., 67, e17127, 10.1002/aic.17127 · DOI
  41. Gracida-Alvarez, 2019, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 7, 18254, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04763 · DOI
  42. Riedewald, 2021, Waste Manage., 120, 698, 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.10.039 · DOI
  43. Jiang, 2020, Energy Fuels, 34, 7397, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01052 · DOI
  44. Fivga, 2018, Energy, 149, 865, 10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.094 · DOI
  45. Jeswani, 2021, Sci. Total Environ, 769, 144483, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144483 · DOI
  46. Das, 2022, Waste Manage., 153, 81, 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.08.015 · DOI
  47. Hanes, 2017, Environ. Syst. Decis., 37, 6, 10.1007/s10669-016-9622-5 · DOI
  48. Liu, 2021, Sci. Adv., 7, eabf8283, 10.1126/sciadv.abf8283 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Dai, 2021, Energy Convers. Manage., 245, 114578, 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114578 · DOI
  50. Westerhout, 1998, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 76, 427, 10.1205/026387698524857 · DOI
  51. Sahu, 2014, Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy, 33, 298, 10.1002/ep.11748 · DOI
  52. Milbrandt, 2022, Resour., Conserv. Recycl., 183, 106363, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106363 · DOI
  53. Brightmark, Press Release. https://www.brightmark.com/plastics-renewal/projects/ashley-indiana , 2021
  54. Qureshi, 2020, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 152, 104804, 10.1016/j.jaap.2020.104804 · DOI
  55. López, 2011, Fuel Process. Technol., 92, 253, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.05.008 · DOI
  56. McNeill, 1995, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 49, 181, 10.1016/0141-3910(95)00064-S · DOI
  57. Budsaereechai, 2019, RSC Adv., 9, 5844, 10.1039/C8RA10058F · DOI
  58. H.Zimmermann and R.Walzl , Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry , 2009
  59. A.Liu , in Handbook of Petroleum Refining Processes , ed. R. A. Meyers , McGraw-Hill Education , New York , 4th edn, 2016
  60. Wernet, 2016, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 21, 1218, 10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Chang, 2020, Process Economics Tool - PEP Yearbook, IHS Markit
  62. Talmadge, 2021, Fuel, 293, 119960, 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119960 · DOI
  63. Jung, 2010, Fuel Process. Technol., 91, 277, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.10.009 · DOI
  64. Rorrer, 2019, Joule, 3, 1006, 10.1016/j.joule.2019.01.018 · DOI
  65. Bare, 2002, J. Ind. Ecol., 6, 49, 10.1162/108819802766269539 · DOI
  66. J.Scheirs and W.Kaminsky , Feedstock recycling and pyrolysis of waste plastics: converting waste plastics into diesel and other fuels , John Wiley & Sons Incorporated , 2006 · DOI
  67. Gebre, 2021, ChemistryOpen, 10, 1202, 10.1002/open.202100184 · DOI
  68. Buekens, 1977, Conserv. Recycl., 1, 247, 10.1016/0361-3658(77)90014-5 · DOI
  69. Kusenberg, 2022, Waste Manage., 141, 104, 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.01.033 · DOI
  70. Li, 2021, Waste Manage., 130, 117, 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.05.023 · DOI
  71. Zayoud, 2022, Waste Manage., 139, 85, 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.018 · DOI
  72. Dao Thi, 2021, Separations, 8, 103, 10.3390/separations8070103 · DOI
  73. Larrain, 2020, J. Cleaner Prod., 270, 122442, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122442 · DOI
  74. Porshnov, 2022, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Energy Environ., 11, e421
  75. Roosen, 2022, Resour., Conserv. Recycl., 178, 106025, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106025 · DOI
  76. Aitani, 2000, Catal. Today, 60, 111, 10.1016/S0920-5861(00)00322-9 · DOI
  77. Lopez, 2017, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 73, 346, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.142 · DOI · Paper page
  78. Ratnasari, 2017, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 124, 631, 10.1016/j.jaap.2016.12.027 · DOI
  79. Nishino, 2008, Fuel, 87, 3681, 10.1016/j.fuel.2008.06.022 · DOI
  80. Sun, 2018, Energy Fuels, 32, 9772, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b02091 · DOI
  81. Dufresne, 2007, Appl. Catal., A, 322, 67, 10.1016/j.apcata.2007.01.013 · DOI
  82. Luna-Murillo, 2020, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 9, 291, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07153 · DOI
  83. Velghe, 2011, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 92, 366, 10.1016/j.jaap.2011.07.011 · DOI
  84. A.-S.Bescond and K.Smith , Chemical Economics Handbook , IHS Markit , 2021
  85. Tilsted, 2022, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 94, 102880, 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102880 · DOI
  86. Kusenberg, 2022, Sci. Total Environ., 156092, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156092 · DOI
  87. Mettler, 2012, Energy Environ. Sci., 5, 7797, 10.1039/c2ee21679e · DOI
  88. Nicholson, 2021, Joule, 5, 673, 10.1016/j.joule.2020.12.027 · DOI · Paper page
  89. Singh, 2021, Joule, 5, 2479, 10.1016/j.joule.2021.06.015 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yadav, G., Singh, A., Dutta, A., Uekert, T., DesVeaux, J. S., Nicholson, S. R., Tan, E. C. D., Mukarakate, C., Schaidle, J. A., Wrasman, C. J., Carpenter, A. C., Baldwin, R. M., Román-Leshkov, Y., & Beckham, G. T.
Affiliations
  • Catalytic Carbon Transformation and Scale-Up Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 80401, USA
  • BOTTLE Consortium, Golden, CO, USA
Venue
Energy & Environmental Science
Published
2023
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
3638-3653
ISSN
  • 1754-5692
  • 1754-5706
Cited by
223
References
4
Language
en
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC36-08GO28308)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review