Cited by 27Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsWater Quality and Pollution Assessment

Urban stormwater capture for water supply: look out for persistent, mobile and toxic substances

Open access
Mutzner, Lena, Zhang, Kefeng, Luthy, Richard G., Arp, Hans Peter H., Spahr, Stephanie·2023·Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology

Abstract

Urban stormwater is a source of persistent, mobile and toxic substances, however the risk for water resources is unknown.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d3ew00160a

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Urban runoff is a relevant input pathway of PFASs into the environment.

    “The limited available data indicates that urban runoff is a relevant input pathway of PFASs into the environment.”
  • Many micropollutants such as PFOS, anthracene, and 4-t-octylephenol have been classified as persistent, bioaccumulative, toxic, and/or mobile substances in stormwater that frequently exceed environmental quality standards.

    “Many of these micropollutants, such as perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), anthracene, and 4-t-octylephenol, have been classified as persistent, bioaccumulative, toxic, and/or mobile substances in stormwater that frequently exceed environmental quality standards (Mutzner et al., 2023).”
  • A recent review by Mutzner et al. (2023) identified 49 persistent, mobile, and toxic (PMT) substances and suggested that unified guidelines are needed to monitor PMTs in stormwater and assess their environmental risks.

    “A recent review by Mutzner et al. (2023) identified 49 persistent, mobile, and toxic (PMT) substances and suggested that unified guidelines are needed to monitor PMTs in stormwater and assess their environmental risks to ensure safe stormwater capture for water reply.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mutzner, L., Zhang, K., Luthy, R. G., Arp, H. P. H., & Spahr, S.
Affiliations
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NO)
  • Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Mutzner, Lena
  • Spahr, Stephanie
Venue
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
Published
2023
Volume
9
Issue
12
Pages
3094-3102
ISSN
  • 2053-1400 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-1419
OpenAlex
W4384914769
Cited by
27
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science Water Research & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DORA Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (101036756)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
Keywords
urban stormwater, stormwater harvesting, water supply, persistent mobile toxic substances, emerging contaminants, water quality risk, urban water resources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review