Cited by 74DNA Repair MechanismsDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

The human checkpoint sensor and alternative DNA clamp Rad9–Rad1–Hus1 modulates the activity of DNA ligase I, a component of the long-patch base excision repair machinery

Open access
SMIRNOVA, Ekaterina, TOUEILLE, Magali, MARKKANEN, Enni, HÜBSCHER, Ulrich·2005·Biochemical Journal

Abstract

The human checkpoint sensor and alternative clamp Rad9–Rad1–Hus1 can interact with and specifically stimulate DNA ligase I. The very recently described interactions of Rad9–Rad1–Hus1 with MutY DNA glycosylase, DNA polymerase β and Flap endonuclease 1 now complete our view that the long-patch base excision machinery is an important target of the Rad9–Rad1–Hus1 complex, thus enhancing the quality control of DNA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1042/bj20050211

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 9-1-1 complex interacts with BER proteins APE1, Pol β, FEN1, DNA ligase I, and DNA glycosylases MutY, NEIL1, and TDG, stimulating their DNA repair activities.

    “As a critical component of ATR-Chk1 checkpoint pathway, the 9-1-1 complex interacts with several BER proteins: APE1, Polymerase β (Pol β), FEN1, DNA ligase I, as well as DNA glycosylases MutY, NEIL1, and TDG, thereby stimulating their DNA repair activities [177–185] (Fig. 3).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tännler, B. (2004) The tumour suppressor protein Flap endonuclease 1 interacts physically with the heterotrimeric checkpoint protein complex Rad9, Rad1, and Hus1. Doctoral Thesis, University of Zürich 26

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SMIRNOVA, E., TOUEILLE, M., MARKKANEN, E., & HÜBSCHER, U.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
Biochemical Journal
Published
2005-06-21
Volume
389
Issue
1
Pages
13-17
ISSN
  • 0264-6021 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-8728
OpenAlex
W2164443758
Cited by
74
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biochemical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (31.61361.00, 61361)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
DNA ligase I, long-patch base excision repair, DNA polymerase beta, FEN1, protein-protein interaction
MeSH terms
DNA Ligase ATP, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Enzyme Activation, Exonucleases, Humans, DNA Ligases, Protein Binding, Cell Cycle Proteins, Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen, Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins, Multiprotein Complexes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review