Cited by 22Stuttering Research and TreatmentLanguage Development and DisordersNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Speech-Language Dissociations, Distractibility, and Childhood Stuttering

Open access
Clark, Chagit E., Conture, Edward G., Walden, Tedra A., Lambert, Warren E.·2015·American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the relation among speech-language dissociations, attentional distractibility, and childhood stuttering. Method: Participants were 82 preschool-age children who stutter (CWS) and 120 who do not stutter (CWNS). Correlation-based statistics (Bates, Appelbaum, Salcedo, Saygin, & Pizzamiglio, 2003) identified dissociations across 5 norm-based speech-language subtests. The Behavioral Style Questionnaire Distractibility subscale measured attentional distractibility. Analyses addressed (a) between-groups differences in the number of children exhibiting speech-language dissociations; (b) between-groups distractibility differences; (c) the relation between distractibility and speech-language dissociations; and (d) whether interactions between distractibility and dissociations predicted the frequency of total, stuttered, and nonstuttered disfluencies. Results: More preschool-age CWS exhibited speech-language dissociations compared with CWNS, and more boys exhibited dissociations compared with girls. In addition, male CWS were less distractible than female CWS and female CWNS. For CWS, but not CWNS, less distractibility (i.e., greater attention) was associated with more speech-language dissociations. Last, interactions between distractibility and dissociations did not predict speech disfluencies in CWS or CWNS. Conclusions: The present findings suggest that for preschool-age CWS, attentional processes are associated with speech-language dissociations. Future investigations are warranted to better understand the directionality of effect of this association (e.g., inefficient attentional processes → speech-language dissociations vs. inefficient attentional processes ← speech-language dissociations).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1044/2015_ajslp-14-0198

Cites

166 of 166 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, C. E., Conture, E. G., Walden, T. A., & Lambert, W. E.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Published
2015-08
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
480-503
ISSN
  • 1058-0360 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9110
OpenAlex
W1485447102
Cited by
22
References
166
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vanderbilt University (UL1 RR024975)
  • Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance
  • National Institutes of Health (RR024975)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC006477, R01DC000523)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR024975, UL1RR024975)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U54HD083211)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
childhood stuttering, attention, disfluency, preschool children, sex differences, behavioral styles
MeSH terms
Attention, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Language Tests, Male, Mass Screening, Speech Articulation Tests, Speech Production Measurement, Statistics as Topic, Stuttering, Cohort Studies, Observer Variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review