Cited by 1,333Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in fixed factor anova designs

Cohen, Jacob·1973·Educational and Psychological Measurement

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/001316447303300111

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, J.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Cohen, Jacob
Venue
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Published
1973-04
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
107-112
ISSN
  • 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3888
OpenAlex
W1982286843
Cited by
1,333
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 45
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational and Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
eta squared, partial eta squared, effect size, group differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review