Cited by 180Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Elderly suicide in Hong Kong—a case-controlled psychological autopsy study

Chiu, H. F. K., Yip, P. S. F., Chi, I., Chan, S., Tsoh, J., Kwan, C. W., Li, S. F., Conwell, Y., Caine, E.·2004·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Objective: To examine some of the risk factors for late life suicide in Hong Kong Chinese using a case‐controlled psychological autopsy approach. Method: Informants of 70 subjects aged 60 or above who had committed suicide as well as a community sample of 100 elderly controls were interviewed. Subjects and controls were assessed for the presence of mental illness, history of suicide attempt and data on health care utilization. Results: Eighty‐six per cent of suicide subjects suffered from a psychiatric problem before committing suicide, compared with 9% of control subjects. Among the psychiatric problems, major depression was the commonest diagnosis. Seventy‐seven per cent of suicide subjects had consulted a doctor within 1 month of suicide. One‐third of suicide subjects had a history of suicide attempt. Rates of current psychiatric diagnosis, rates of medical consultation and history of suicide attempt are all significantly higher in suicide subjects than controls. Conclusion: Our findings support the view that depressive disorders and a past history of suicide attempt are risk factors of late‐life suicide in the Chinese population of Hong Kong, similar to findings in western studies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1600-0447.2003.00263.x

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hawton K, 1998, The psychological autopsy approach to studying suicide: a review of methodological issues, J Affect Disord, 50, 269
  2. Lonnqvist JK., The international handbook of suicide and attempted suicide, 107

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chiu, H. F. K., Yip, P. S. F., Chi, I., Chan, S., Tsoh, J., Kwan, C. W., Li, S. F., Conwell, Y., & Caine, E.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chiu, H. F. K.
  • Chi, I.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03-03
Volume
109
Issue
4
Pages
299-305
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2096654221
Cited by
180
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
12.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Hong Kong
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
elderly suicide, late-life suicide, risk factors, major depressive disorder, suicide attempt history, mental illness, medical consultation, Hong Kong Chinese, psychological autopsy
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Autopsy, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Suicide, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review