Cited by 269Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 135 of the 135 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gaia DR2 proper motions of dwarf galaxies within 420 kpc: Orbits, Milky Way mass, tidal influences, planar alignments, and group infall

Open access
Fritz, T. K., Battaglia, G., Pawlowski, M. S., Kallivayalil, N., van der Marel, R., Sohn, S. T., Brook, C., Besla, G.·2018·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

A proper understanding of the Milky Way (MW) dwarf galaxies in a cosmological context requires knowledge of their 3D velocities and orbits. However, proper motion (PM) measurements have generally been of limited accuracy and are available only for more massive dwarfs. We therefore present a new study of the kinematics of the MW dwarf galaxies. We use the Gaia DR2 for those dwarfs that have been spectroscopically observed in the literature. We derive systemic PMs for 39 galaxies and galaxy candidates out to 420 kpc, and generally find good consistency for the subset with measurements available from other studies. We derive the implied Galactocentric velocities, and calculate orbits in canonical MW halo potentials of low (0.8 × 10 12 M ⊙ ) and high mass (1.6 × 10 12 M ⊙ ). Comparison of the distributions of orbital apocenters and 3D velocities to the halo virial radius and escape velocity, respectively, suggests that the satellite kinematics are best explained in the high-mass halo. Tuc III, Crater II, and additional candidates have orbital pericenters small enough to imply significant tidal influences. Relevant to the missing satellite problem, the fact that fewer galaxies are observed to be near apocenter than near pericenter implies that there must be a population of distant dwarf galaxies yet to be discovered. Of the 39 dwarfs: 12 have orbital poles that do not align with the MW plane of satellites (given reasonable assumptions about its intrinsic thickness); 10 have insufficient PM accuracy to establish whether they align; and 17 satellites align, of which 11 are co-orbiting and (somewhat surprisingly, in view of prior knowledge) 6 are counter-orbiting. Group infall might have contributed to this, but no definitive association is found for the members of the Crater-Leo group.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361/201833343

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 135 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Erkal, 2018, MNRAS, 481, 3148
  2. Fritz, 2018, A&A, 866, 22
  3. Hamanowicz, 2016, Acta Astron., 66, 197
  4. Kallivayalil, 2018, JINA - Segue Virtual Journal, 13, 18
  5. Massari D., & Helmi A. 2018, A&A, accepted, [arXiv:1805.01839] · arXiv
  6. Pace A. B., & Li T. S. 2018, ApJ, submitted, [arXiv:1806.02345] · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fritz, T. K., Battaglia, G., Pawlowski, M. S., Kallivayalil, N., van der Marel, R., Sohn, S. T., Brook, C., & Besla, G.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de La Laguna (ES)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2018-11
Volume
619
Pages
A103
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W4289328036
Cited by
269
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 12
FWCI
21.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1455260, CAREER)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (HST‐HF2‐51379.001‐A, NAS 526555)
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (NAS5- 26555, 26555)
  • European Space Agency
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (AYA2014-56795-P, RYC-2012-11537)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
Milky Way dwarf galaxies, proper motions, satellite kinematics, Gaia DR2, escape velocity, missing satellites problem, tidal interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review