Cited by 52Fatty Acid Research and HealthDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects

The effect of n-3 fatty acids on C-reactive protein levels in patients with chronic renal failure

Madsen, Trine, Schmidt, Erik B., Christensen, Jeppe H.·2007·Journal of Renal Nutrition

Abstract

Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF). C-reactive protein (CRP), a strong independent risk marker of CVD, is elevated in a large proportion of patients with CRF. The long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) have cardioprotective effects, which may be partly attributed to their anti-inflammatory properties.Objective The study objective was to investigate the effect of n-3 PUFA on serum levels of CRP in patients with CRF.Design We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.Setting The study took place at an outpatients clinic at the Department of Nephrology, Aalborg Hospital, Denmark.Patients The study comprised 46 patients (30 men and 16 women; mean age 59 +/- 11 years) with a serum creatinine level in the range of 150 to 400 micromol/L.Intervention The patients were randomly assigned to daily supplementation with 2.4 g n-3 PUFA or identical capsules containing 2.4 g of olive oil (control) for 8 weeks.Main outcome measure CRP was measured with a high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) assay and the content of n-3 PUFA in granulocyte membranes before and after supplementation.Results The n-3 PUFA concentration increased in granulocytes after the n-3 PUFA supplements but was unaltered by the control oil. A nonsignificant reduction in hs-CRP was observed in the n-3 PUFA group after supplementation (2.46 vs. 1.47 mg/L; P = .06), and hs-CRP was unaltered by the control oil (3.27 vs. 3.14 mg/L; P = .12). There was no difference in median hs-CRP change in the two groups.Conclusion A trend was seen toward a reduction in hs-CRP in the n-3 PUFA group, but there was no significant difference in hs-CRP levels when both groups were compared.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.jrn.2007.03.003

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Madsen, T., Schmidt, E. B., & Christensen, J. H.
Affiliations
Aalborg University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Madsen, Trine
Venue
Journal of Renal Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
258-263
ISSN
1051-2276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077479591
Cited by
52
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Renal Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Keywords
omega-3 fatty acids, C-reactive protein, chronic kidney disease, omega-3 supplementation, cardiovascular risk, inflammation, olive oil placebo, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein
MeSH terms
Olive Oil, Adult, Aged, C-Reactive Protein, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cell Membrane, Creatinine, Dietary Fats, Unsaturated, Double-Blind Method, Female, Granulocytes, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Middle Aged, Plant Oils, Risk Factors, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Treatment Outcome, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review