Cited by 19Body Composition Measurement TechniquesSports Performance and TrainingPhysical Education and Training Studies

Field Methods to Estimate Fat-Free Mass in International Soccer Players

Open access
Nuñez, F. Javier, Munguia-Izquierdo, Diego, Petri, Cristian, Suarez-Arrones, Luis·2019·International Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Based on the high financial and logistical costs associated with the assessment of body composition with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), this study determined which field method has the best correlation with DXA data, and developed an equation to estimate fat-free mass (FFM) using the field anthropometric data in international soccer players. A total of 17 international soccer players participated in this study. DXA values provided a criterion measure of FFM. Correlation coefficients, biases, limits of agreement, and differences were used as validity measures, and regression analyses were used to develop the prediction equation. All field methods used to obtain FFM data showed positive correlations (r from 0.90-0.96) with DXA. Only the equation developed by Deurenberg et al. [6] showed no differences from DXA with a low bias. The main strength of this study was providing a valid and accurate equation to estimate FFM specifically in international soccer players.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/a-0969-8591

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DXA, although considered the gold standard method, has limitations that can affect calculations of measurements, such as subject dimensions, high economic cost, experience needed, and software updates.

    “In relation to DXA, although it is considered the gold standard method, it has limitations that can affect the calculations of the measurements, such as the dimensions of the subject to be analyzed (both in height and width), the high economic cost, the experience needed for processing and interpreting the results, or software updates with new algorithms to calculate body composition [6,8,75,107].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Marfell-Jones MJ, Stewart AD, de Ridder JH.International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment. Wellington, New Zealand: International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry, 2012. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/11072/1510

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nuñez, F. J., Munguia-Izquierdo, D., Petri, C., & Suarez-Arrones, L.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Pablo de Olavide (ES)
  • University of Pablo de Olavide, Physical Performance & Sports Research, Seville, Spain
  • University of Florence (IT)
Venue
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2019-07-31
Volume
40
Issue
10
Pages
619-624
ISSN
  • 0172-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3964
OpenAlex
W2966229799
Cited by
19
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RIO (Universidad Pablo de Olavide) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
Keywords
fat-free mass, body composition, soccer players, prediction equations, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, method validity
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Composition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Male, Regression Analysis, Skinfold Thickness, Soccer, Absorptiometry, Photon, Electric Impedance, Adiposity, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review