Cited by 2,154Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 245 of the 245 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neurocognitive Consequences of Sleep Deprivation

Open access
Goel, Namni, Rao, Hengyi, Durmer, Jeffrey, Dinges, David·2009·Seminars in Neurology

Abstract

Sleep deprivation is associated with considerable social, financial, and health-related costs, in large measure because it produces impaired cognitive performance due to increasing sleep propensity and instability of waking neurobehavioral functions. Cognitive functions particularly affected by sleep loss include psychomotor and cognitive speed, vigilant and executive attention, working memory, and higher cognitive abilities. Chronic sleep-restriction experiments--which model the kind of sleep loss experienced by many individuals with sleep fragmentation and premature sleep curtailment due to disorders and lifestyle--demonstrate that cognitive deficits accumulate to severe levels over time without full awareness by the affected individual. Functional neuroimaging has revealed that frequent and progressively longer cognitive lapses, which are a hallmark of sleep deprivation, involve distributed changes in brain regions including frontal and parietal control areas, secondary sensory processing areas, and thalamic areas. There are robust differences among individuals in the degree of their cognitive vulnerability to sleep loss that may involve differences in prefrontal and parietal cortices, and that may have a basis in genes regulating sleep homeostasis and circadian rhythms. Thus, cognitive deficits believed to be a function of the severity of clinical sleep disturbance may be a product of genetic alleles associated with differential cognitive vulnerability to sleep loss.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0029-1237117

Cites

245 of 245 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 245 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [30]Ulmer C Wolman DM Johns MME Resident duty hours: enhancing sleep, supervision, and safety Committee on Optimizing Graduate Medical Trainee (Resident) Hours and Work Schedules to Improve Patient Safety. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies 2008 Washington, DC The National Academies Press 25009922
  2. [100]Harrison Y Horne JA Sleep loss impairs short and novel language tasks having a prefrontal focus J Sleep Res 1998 7 2 95 100 9682180
  3. [164]Asllani I Habeck C Borogovac A Effects of 48hr sleep deprivation on cerebral blood flow measured with arterial spin labeling MRI Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2007 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Berkeley, CA 0507
  4. [165]Rao H Lim J Wu WC Detre JA Dinges DF Neural correlates of inter-individual differences in sleep deprivation susceptibility: a pilot perfusion imaging study on the Psychomotor Vigilance Test Paper presented at: National Sleep Foundation Young Investigators Conference, Basic Research Session March 2, 2008 Washington, DC

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,005

Metadata

Authors
Goel, N., Rao, H., Durmer, J., & Dinges, D.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Seminars in Neurology
Published
2009-09
Volume
29
Issue
04
Pages
320-339
ISSN
  • 0271-8235 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-9021
OpenAlex
W2159662907
Cited by
2,154
References
245
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 124 · 2021: 130 · 2020: 156 · 2019: 137 · 2018: 132 · 2017: 120 · 2016: 149 · 2015: 147 · 2014: 137 · 2013: 126 · 2012: 89
FWCI
139.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Seminars in Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (NR004281, R01NR004281)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024134)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
sleep deprivation, cognitive impairment, sleep fragmentation, cognitive vulnerability, individual differences, prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, thalamus, executive attention, working memory, sustained attention, circadian rhythm genes, sleep homeostasis, chronic sleep restriction
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Brain, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Sleep Deprivation, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review