Cited by 896Herpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsInfectious Encephalopathies and EncephalitisCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research

Vidarabine versus Acyclovir Therapy in Herpes Simplex Encephalitis

Whitley, Richard J., Alford, Charles A., Hirsch, Martin S., Schooley, Robert T., Luby, James P., Aoki, Fred Y., Hanley, Daniel, Nahmias, Andre J. +2 more·1986·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

We randomly assigned 208 patients who underwent brain biopsy for presumptive herpes simplex encephalitis to receive either vidarabine (15 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) or acyclovir (30 mg per kilogram per day) for 10 days. Sixty-nine patients (33 percent) had biopsy-proved disease; 37 received vidarabine, and 32 acyclovir. The mortality in the vidarabine recipients was 54 percent, as compared with 28 percent in the acyclovir recipients (P = 0.008). Six-month mortality varied according to the Glasgow coma score at the onset of therapy. For scores of greater than 10, 7 to 10, and less than or equal to 6, mortality was 42, 46, and 67 percent in the patients treated with vidarabine, as compared with 0, 25, and 25 percent in those treated with acyclovir. A six-month morbidity assessment using an adapted scoring system revealed that 5 of 37 patients receiving vidarabine (14 percent) as compared with 12 of 32 receiving acyclovir (38 percent) were functioning normally (P = 0.021). Eight vidarabine-treated patients (22 percent) and three acyclovir-treated patients (9 percent) had moderate debility. Patients under 30 years of age and with a Glasgow coma score above 10 had the best outcome with acyclovir treatment. We conclude that acyclovir is currently the treatment of choice for biopsy-proved herpes simplex encephalitis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198601163140303

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitley, R. J., Alford, C. A., Hirsch, M. S., Schooley, R. T., Luby, J. P., Aoki, F. Y., Hanley, D., Nahmias, A. J., Soong, S.-J., & The NIAID Collaborative Antiviral Study Group*
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1986-01-16
Volume
314
Issue
3
Pages
144-149
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2336900894
Cited by
896
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 32
FWCI
46.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01ai012667-020)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-13 148)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (N0-1-AI-12667)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR-032)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Keywords
herpes simplex encephalitis, vidarabine, acyclovir, antiviral therapy, mortality, Glasgow coma score, functional outcome, debility, treatment comparison
MeSH terms
Acyclovir, Adolescent, Adult, Biopsy, Brain, Child, Child, Preschool, Encephalitis, Female, Herpes Simplex, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Vidarabine, Simplexvirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review