Cited by 96Sleep and related disordersSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Effect of Gradual Withdrawal on the Rebound Sleep Disorder after Discontinuation of Triazolam

Greenblatt, David J., Harmatz, Jerold S., Zinny, Miguel A., Shader, Richard I.·1987·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Sixty volunteers with insomnia participated in a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. After an initial six nights of placebo, 30 subjects (the abrupt-withdrawal group) received 0.5 mg of triazolam nightly for 7 to 10 nights, after which they received placebo. The other 30 subjects (the tapered-dosage group) received the same initial placebo treatment, then triazolam at 0.5 mg for seven nights, at 0.25 mg for two nights, and at 0.125 mg for two nights, and then placebo. As compared with the initial placebo period, the triazolam period significantly reduced the interval before the onset of sleep (sleep latency), and it prolonged sleep duration, reduced the number of awakenings, and improved the self-rated soundness of sleep in all cohorts. In the abrupt-withdrawal group, plasma levels of triazolam were undetectable the morning after the first night of placebo substitution, and subjects reported prolongation of sleep latency (57 minutes longer than base line), reduction in sleep duration (1.4 hours less than base line), and increased awakenings (1.2 per night above base line). The symptoms of rebound sleep disorder lasted one or possibly two nights, and there was a reversion toward base line on subsequent placebo nights. In the tapered-dosage group, however, plasma triazolam levels fell gradually to zero, and rebound symptoms were decreased or eliminated. Thus, rebound sleep disorder following abrupt discontinuation of triazolam can be attenuated by a regimen of tapering.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198709173171202

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greenblatt, D. J., Harmatz, J. S., Zinny, M. A., & Shader, R. I.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1987-09-17
Volume
317
Issue
12
Pages
722-728
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2326818216
Cited by
96
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
13.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-00106)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 34223)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
triazolam, benzodiazepine withdrawal, medication tapering, abrupt discontinuation, insomnia, sleep latency, sleep duration, nocturnal awakenings, plasma drug concentration
MeSH terms
Adult, Clinical Trials as Topic, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Triazolam

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review