Cited by 196Ovarian function and disordersEndometriosis Research and TreatmentDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

The management of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome

Jayasena, Channa N., Franks, Stephen·2014·Nature Reviews Endocrinology

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder in women. The syndrome is typified by its heterogeneous presentation, which includes hirsutism (a function of hypersecretion of ovarian androgens), menstrual irregularity and infertility (that is due to infrequent or absent ovulation). Furthermore, PCOS predisposes patients to metabolic dysfunction and an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aetiology of the syndrome has a major genetic component. Obesity exacerbates the insulin resistance that is a feature of PCOS in many women and amplifies the clinical and biochemical abnormalities. In clinical practice, the choice of investigations to be done depends mainly on the presenting symptoms. The approach to management is likewise dependent on the presenting complaint. Symptoms of androgen excess (hirsutism, acne and alopecia) require cosmetic measures, suppression of ovarian androgen function and anti-androgen therapy, alone or in combination. Ovulation rate is improved by diet and lifestyle intervention in overweight individuals but induction of ovulation by, in the first instance, anti-estrogens is usually required. Monitoring of glucose is important in overweight women and/or those with a family history of T2DM. Metformin is indicated for women with impaired glucose tolerance but whether this drug is otherwise useful in women with PCOS remains debatable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrendo.2014.102

Cites

188 of 188 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 189 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jayasena, C. N., & Franks, S.
Affiliations
Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Franks, Stephen
Venue
Nature Reviews Endocrinology
Published
2014-07-15
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
624-636
ISSN
  • 1759-5029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5037
OpenAlex
W1996079534
Cited by
196
References
189
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (CL-2009-21-004)
  • Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS-SGCL5-Jayasena)
  • European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, hyperandrogenism, hirsutism, menstrual irregularity, infertility, insulin resistance, obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiometabolic risk, antiandrogen therapy, ovulation induction, metformin, impaired glucose tolerance, lifestyle intervention, pathophysiology, etiology
MeSH terms
Androgen Antagonists, Androgens, Animals, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Hirsutism, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Disease Management, Risk Reduction Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review