Cited by 1,961Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsComplement system in diseasesOcular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A common haplotype in the complement regulatory gene factor H ( HF1/CFH ) predisposes individuals to age-related macular degeneration

Open access

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most frequent cause of irreversible blindness in the elderly in developed countries. Our previous studies implicated activation of complement in the formation of drusen, the hallmark lesion of AMD. Here, we show that factor H (HF1), the major inhibitor of the alternative complement pathway, accumulates within drusen and is synthesized by the retinal pigmented epithelium. Because previous linkage analyses identified chromosome 1q25-32, which harbors the factor H gene ( HF1 / CFH ), as an AMD susceptibility locus, we analyzed HF1 for genetic variation in two independent cohorts comprised of ≈900 AMD cases and 400 matched controls. We found association of eight common HF1 SNPs with AMD; two common missense variants exhibit highly significant associations (I62V, χ 2 = 26.1 and P = 3.2 × 10 -7 and Y402H, χ 2 = 54.4 and P = 1.6 × 10 -13 ). Haplotype analysis reveals that multiple HF1 variants confer elevated or reduced risk of AMD. One common at-risk haplotype is present at a frequency of 50% in AMD cases and 29% in controls [odds ratio (OR) = 2.46, 95% confidence interval (1.95-3.11)]. Homozygotes for this haplotype account for 24% of cases and 8% of controls [OR = 3.51, 95% confidence interval (2.13-5.78)]. Several protective haplotypes are also identified (OR = 0.44-0.55), further implicating HF1 function in the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying AMD. We propose that genetic variation in a regulator of the alternative complement pathway, when combined with a triggering event, such as infection, underlie a major proportion of AMD in the human population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0501536102

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Klaver, C. C., Assink, J. J., van Leeuwen, R., Wolfs, R. C., Vingerling, J. R., Stijnen, T., Hofman, A. & de Jong, P. T. (2001) Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 42, 2237-2241.11527936
  2. Hu, J. & Bok, D. (2001) Mol. Vision 7, 14-19.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,961

Metadata

Authors
Hageman, G. S., Anderson, D. H., Johnson, L. V., Hancox, L. S., Taiber, A. J., Hardisty, L. I., Hageman, J. L., Stockman, H. A., Borchardt, J. D., Gehrs, K. M., Smith, R. J. H., Silvestri, G., Russell, S. R., Klaver, C. C. W., Barbazetto, I., Chang, S., Yannuzzi, L. A., Barile, G. R., Merriam, J. C., Smith, R. T., Olsh, A. K., Bergeron, J., Zernant, J., Merriam, J. E., Gold, B., Dean, M., & Allikmets, R.
Affiliations
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-05-03
Volume
102
Issue
20
Pages
7227-7232
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2125236492
Cited by
1,961
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 78 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 111 · 2013: 117 · 2012: 116
FWCI
146.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Research to Prevent Blindness
  • Retina Research Foundation
  • Queen's University
  • National Institutes of Health (n01co12400-79-0-22, NO1-CO12400)
  • National Eye Institute (EY11515, R01EY013435, EY-13435, R01EY011521, EY 11-521, R01EY011527, R01EY011515, EY11527)
  • National Cancer Institute (N01CO12400, N01-CO-012400)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Complement system in diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
Keywords
age-related macular degeneration, complement factor H, complement regulatory proteins, alternative complement pathway, drusen, retinal pigment epithelium, haplotype association, single nucleotide polymorphisms, genetic susceptibility, missense mutations, complement activation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, DNA Mutational Analysis, Genotype, Haplotypes, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Macular Degeneration, Middle Aged, Pigment Epithelium of Eye, Risk Factors, Genetic Variation, Odds Ratio, Complement Factor H, Mutation, Missense, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Gene Components, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review