The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distinct mechanisms act in concert to mediate cell cycle arrest
Open accessAbstract
In response to DNA damage, cells arrest at specific stages in the cell cycle. This arrest must fulfill at least 3 requirements: it must be activated promptly; it must be sustained as long as damage is present to prevent loss of genomic information; and after the arrest, cells must re-enter into the appropriate cell cycle phase to ensure proper ploidy. Multiple molecular mechanisms capable of arresting the cell cycle have been identified in mammalian cells; however, it is unknown whether each mechanism meets all 3 requirements or whether they act together to confer specific functions to the arrest. To address this question, we integrated mathematical models describing the cell cycle and the DNA damage signaling networks and tested the contributions of each mechanism to cell cycle arrest and re-entry. Predictions from this model were then tested with quantitative experiments to identify the combined action of arrest mechanisms in irradiated cells. We find that different arrest mechanisms serve indispensable roles in the proper cellular response to DNA damage over time: p53-independent cyclin inactivation confers immediate arrest, whereas p53-dependent cyclin downregulation allows this arrest to be sustained. Additionally, p21-mediated inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase activity is indispensable for preventing improper cell cycle re-entry and endoreduplication. This work shows that in a complex signaling network, seemingly redundant mechanisms, acting in a concerted fashion, can achieve a specific cellular outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A model originally proposed by the Lahav group suggests that cells stably blocked in G2 eventually undergo mitotic bypass -a passage from G2 to G1 without chromosome segregation -and enter a tetraploid G1 phase where they cannot replicate due to p21-mediated inhibition of cyclin E1-Cdk2.89”
From Senescence from G2 arrest, revisited (2015) · cites this paper as [89]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Requirement for p53 and p21 to Sustain G 2 Arrest After DNA Damage
Bunz, F., Dutriaux, A., Lengauer, C., Waldman, T., Zhou, S., Brown, J. P., Sedivy, J. M., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5393.1497 · Cited by 2,803
The p53 pathway: positive and negative feedback loops
Harris, S. L., & Levine, A. J. (2005) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1208615 · Cited by 1,967
Enhanced Phosphorylation of p53 by ATM in Response to DNA Damage
Banin, S., Moyal, L., Shieh, S.-Y., Taya, Y., Anderson, C. W., Chessa, L., Smorodinsky, N. I., Prives, C., Reiss, Y., Shiloh, Y., et al. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5383.1674 · Cited by 1,797
p21 is necessary for the p53-mediated G1 arrest in human cancer cells.
Waldman, T. A., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1995) · PubMed · Cited by 1,188
Living on a break: cellular senescence as a DNA-damage response
d'Adda di Fagagna, F. (2008) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2440 · Cited by 1,170
Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases by p21.
Harper, J., Elledge, S., Keyomarsi, K., Dynlacht, B., Tsai, L., Zhang, P.-M., Dobrowolski, S., Bai, C., Connell-Crowley, L., & Swindell, E. (1995) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.6.4.387 · Cited by 1,111
Murray, A. W. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)01080-8 · Cited by 1,079
Dynamics of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop in individual cells
Lahav, G., Rosenfeld, N., Sigal, A., Geva‐Zatorsky, N., Levine, A. J., Elowitz, M. B., & Alon, U. (2004) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1293 · Cited by 1,026
Self-citationShieh, S.-Y., Ahn, J., Tamai, K., Taya, Y., & Prives, C. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.14.3.289 · Cited by 972
Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated phosphorylates Chk2 in vivo and in vitro
Matsuoka, S., Rotman, G., Ogawa, A., Shiloh, Y., Tamai, K., & Elledge, S. J. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.190030497 · Cited by 849
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Metabolite profiling identifies a key role for glycine in rapid cancer cell proliferation
Jain, M., Nilsson, R., Sharma, S., Madhusudhan, N., Kitami, T., Souza, A. L., Kafri, R., Kirschner, M. W., Clish, C. B., & Mootha, V. K. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1218595 · Cited by 1,403
The DREAM complex: master coordinator of cell cycle-dependent gene expression
Sadasivam, S., & DeCaprio, J. A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3556 · Cited by 524
Karanam, K., Kafri, R., Loewer, A., & Lahav, G. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.052 · Cited by 435
Self-citationCancer systems biology: a network modeling perspective
Kreeger, P. K., & Lauffenburger, D. A. (2009) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgp261 · Cited by 382
Cell-cycle-regulated activation of Akt kinase by phosphorylation at its carboxyl terminus
Liu, P., Begley, M., Michowski, W., Inuzuka, H., Ginzberg, M. B., Gao, D., Tsou, P., Gan, W., Papa, A., Kim, B. M., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13079 · Cited by 373
Senescence from G2 arrest, revisited
Gire, V., & Dulić, V. (2015) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.1080/15384101.2014.1000134 · Cited by 300
Basal Dynamics of p53 Reveal Transcriptionally Attenuated Pulses in Cycling Cells
Loewer, A., Batchelor, E., Gaglia, G., & Lahav, G. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.031 · Cited by 239
Self-citationDynamic modelling of oestrogen signalling and cell fate in breast cancer cells
Tyson, J. J., Baumann, W. T., Chen, C., Verdugo, A., Tavassoly, I., Wang, Y., Weiner, L. M., & Clarke, R. C. (2011) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3081 · Cited by 190
Disorder and residual helicity alter p53-Mdm2 binding affinity and signaling in cells
Borcherds, W. M., Theillet, F., Katzer, A., Finzel, A., Mishall, K. M., Powell, A. T., Wu, H., Manieri, W., Dieterich, C., Selenko, P., et al. (2014) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1668 · Cited by 187
Self-citationAndersen, M. E., M.A., H. J. C. I., Bermudez, E., Dodd, D. E., Willson, G. A., Campbell, J. L., & Thomas, R. S. (2010) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfq303 · Cited by 127
From structure to dynamics: Frequency tuning in the p53–Mdm2 network
Abou-Jaoudé, W., Ouattara, D. A., & Kaufman, M. (2009) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.02.005 · Cited by 124
CDK-Independent and PCNA-Dependent Functions of p21 in DNA Replication
Mansilla, S. F., De La Vega, M. B., Calzetta, N. L., Siri, S. O., & Gottifredi, V. (2020) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes11060593 · Cited by 114
Understanding resistance to combination chemotherapy
Pritchard, J. R., Lauffenburger, D. A., & Hemann, M. T. (2012) · Drug Resistance Updates · doi:10.1016/j.drup.2012.10.003 · Cited by 100
Two Interlinked Bistable Switches Govern Mitotic Control in Mammalian Cells
Rata, S., Rodríguez, M. F. S. P., Joseph, S., Peter, N., Iturra, F. E., Yang, F., Madzvamuse, A., Ruppert, J. G., Samejima, K., Platani, M., et al. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.09.059 · Cited by 87
Lossaint, G., Besnard, E., Fisher, D., Piette, J., & Dulić, V (2011) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2011.135 · Cited by 83
Chromosomal Arrangement of Phosphorelay Genes Couples Sporulation and DNA Replication
Narula, J., Kuchina, A., Lee, D.-Y. D., Fujita, M., Süel, G. M., & Igoshin, O. A. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.012 · Cited by 80
Ryl, T., Kuchen, E. E., Bell, E., Shao, C., Flórez, A. F., Mönke, G., Gogolin, S., Friedrich, M., Lamprecht, F., Westermann, F., et al. (2017) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2017.07.005 · Cited by 79
Cellular senescence and kidney aging
Rex, N., Melk, A., & Schmitt, R. (2023) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs20230140 · Cited by 89
Lindqvist, A., de Bruijn, M., Macurek, L., Brás, A., Mensinga, A., Bruinsma, W., Voets, O., Kranenburg, O., & Medema, R. H. (2009) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.246 · Cited by 75
De, S., Campbell, C., Venkitaraman, A. R., & Esposito, A. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.01.074 · Cited by 67
Logical modelling of cell cycle control in eukaryotes: a comparative study
Fauré, A., & Thieffry, D. (2009) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/b907562n · Cited by 67
Mende, N., Kuchen, E. E., Lesche, M., Grinenko, T., Kokkaliaris, K. D., Hanenberg, H., Lindemann, D., Dahl, A., Platz, A., Höfer, T., et al. (2015) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20150308 · Cited by 65
Computational modeling of mammalian signaling networks
Hughey, J., Lee, T. K., & Covert, M. W. (2009) · WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1002/wsbm.52 · Cited by 65
From structure to dynamics: Frequency tuning in the p53-Mdm2 network. II
Ouattara, D. A., Abou-Jaoudé, W., & Kaufman, M. (2010) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.03.031 · Cited by 61
Ankers, J., Awais, R., Jones, N. A., Boyd, J., Ryan, S., Adamson, A. D., Harper, C. V., Bridge, L., Spiller, D. G., Jackson, D. A., et al. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.10473 · Cited by 63
Halim, V. A., Álvarez‐Fernández, M., Xu, Y. J., Aprelia, M., van den Toorn, H., Heck, A. J. R., Mohammed, S., & Medema, R. H. (2013) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.2003664 · Cited by 60
Stress-specific response of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop
Hunziker, A., Jensen, M. H., & Krishna, S. (2010) · BMC Systems Biology · doi:10.1186/1752-0509-4-94 · Cited by 59
Sizek, H., Hamel, A. R., Deritei, D., Campbell, S., & Regan, E. R. (2019) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006402 · Cited by 53
Iwamoto, K., Hamada, H., Eguchi, Y., & Okamoto, M. (2010) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2010.11.011 · Cited by 48
Cell size homeostasis is maintained by CDK4-dependent activation of p38 MAPK
Tan, C., Ginzberg, M. B., Webster, R., Iyengar, S., Liu, S., Papadopoli, D. J., Concannon, J. B., Wang, Y., Auld, D. S., Jenkins, J. L., et al. (2021) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2021.04.030 · Cited by 51
Oscillatory control of signalling molecules
Paszek, P., Jackson, D. A., & White, M. (2010) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2010.08.004 · Cited by 46
Sheng, C., Mendler, I.-H., Rieke, S., Snyder, P., Jentsch, M., Friedrich, D., Drossel, B., & Loewer, A. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.031 · Cited by 45
Self-citationThe DNA damage response—Repair or despair?
Ljungman, M. E. (2010) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/em.20597 · Cited by 49
Turesson, I., Nyman, J., Qvarnström, F., Simonsson, M., Book, M., Hermansson, I., Sigurðardóttir, S., & Johansson, K.-A. (2009) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2009.10.007 · Cited by 47
van Biljon, R., Niemand, J., van Wyk, R., Clark, K., Verlinden, B. K., Abrie, C., von Grüning, H., Smidt, W., Smit, A., Reader, J., et al. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34964-w · Cited by 42
The Effects of Muscle Cell Aging on Myogenesis
Moustogiannis, A., Philippou, Α., Taso, O. S., Zevolis, E., Pappa, M. B., Chatzigeorgiou, A., & Koutsilieris, M. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22073721 · Cited by 45
Solhaug, A., Holme, J. A., Haglund, K., Dendelé, B., Sergent, O., Pestka, J. J., Lagadic‐Gossmann, D., & Eriksen, G. S. (2013) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.02.012 · Cited by 44
Lv, X., Liu, C., Liu, S., Li, Y., Wang, W., Li, K., Hua, F., Cui, B., Zhang, X., Yu, J., et al. (2021) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2021.07.015 · Cited by 48
Current status of mathematical modeling of cancer – From the viewpoint of cancer hallmarks
Magi, S., Iwamoto, K., & Okada, M. (2017) · Current Opinion in Systems Biology · doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2017.02.008 · Cited by 43
Cell-to-cell variability in cell death: can systems biology help us make sense of it all?
Xia, X., Owen, M., Lee, R., & Gaudet, S. (2014) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2014.199 · Cited by 39
Decision making of the p53 network: Death by integration
Li, Z., Ni, M., Li, J., Zhang, Y., Ouyang, Q., & Tang, C. (2010) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.11.041 · Cited by 39
Biliary Epithelial Senescence in Liver Disease: There Will Be SASP
Meadows, V., Baiocchi, L., Kundu, D., Sato, K., Fuentes, Y., Wu, C., Chakraborty, S., Glaser, S. S., Alpini, G. D., Kennedy, L. L., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.803098 · Cited by 36
Principles of dynamical modularity in biological regulatory networks
Deritei, D., Aird, W. C., Ercsey-Ravasz, M., & Regan, E. R. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep21957 · Cited by 38
Pfeuty, B. (2015) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.112649 · Cited by 34
Mielnichuk, N., Sgarlata, C., & Pérez‐Martín, J. (2009) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.052233 · Cited by 33
Li, H., Yang, H., Wu, T., Zhang, X., Jiang, W., Ma, Q., Chen, Y., Xu, Y. H., Li, S., & Hua, Z. (2010) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.22052 · Cited by 33
A feedback loop of conditionally stable circuits drives the cell cycle from checkpoint to checkpoint
Deritei, D., Rozum, J. C., Regan, E. R., & Albert, R. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-52725-1 · Cited by 32
Netterfield, T. S., Ostheimer, G. J., Tentner, A. R., Joughin, B. A., Dakoyannis, A. M., Sharma, C. D., Sorger, P. K., Janes, K. A., Lauffenburger, D. A., & Yaffe, M. B. (2022) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2023.06.005 · Cited by 32
Self-citationGinsenoside Rg3: A Review of its Anticancer Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutic Applications
Wu, L., Bai, L., Dai, W., Wu, Y., Xi, P., Zhang, J., & Zheng, L. (2024) · Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0115680266283661240226052054 · Cited by 30
Multiple centrosomes enhance migration and immune cell effector functions of mature dendritic cells
Weier, A.-K., Homrich, M., Ebbinghaus, S., Jůda, P., Miková, E., Hauschild, R., Zhang, L., Quast, T., Mass, E., Schlitzer, A., et al. (2022) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.202107134 · Cited by 29
A dynamical framework for complex fractional killing
Ballweg, R., Paek, A. L., & Zhang, T. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-07422-2 · Cited by 27
In Mitosis You Are Not: The NIMA Family of Kinases in Aspergillus, Yeast, and Mammals
Bachus, S., Graves, D., Fulham, L., Akkerman, N., Stephanson, C., Shieh, J., & Pelka, P. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23074041 · Cited by 25
Quantitative Assessment of the Complex Dynamics of G1, S, and G2-M Checkpoint Activities
Ubezio, P., Lupi, M., Branduardi, D., Cappella, P., Cavallini, E., Colombo, V., Matera, G., Natoli, C., Tomasoni, D., & D’Incalci, M. (2009) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-3911 · Cited by 26
Pierre, K. K., Rao, R., Hartmanshenn, C., & Androulakis, I. P. (2018) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2017-03226 · Cited by 25
de Sena-Tomás, C., Fernández-Álvarez, A., Holloman, W. K., & Pérez‐Martín, J. (2011) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.110.082552 · Cited by 24
Kumar, A., Alfhili, M. A., Bari, A., Ennaji, H., Ahamed, M., Bourhia, M., Chebaibi, M., Benbacer, L., Ghneim, H. K., Abudawood, M., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2022.972111 · Cited by 25
Recent progress and open challenges in modeling p53 dynamics in single cells
Batchelor, E., & Loewer, A. (2017) · Current Opinion in Systems Biology · doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2017.04.007 · Cited by 23
Self-citationPfeuty, B. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035291 · Cited by 23
Mathematical Modelling of p53 Signalling during DNA Damage Response: A Survey
Eliaš, J., & Macnamara, C. K. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms221910590 · Cited by 21
Bo, S., He, H., Li, W., Ling, H. Y., Hong, X., Lin, D., Dai, W., Wu, Y., Ai, X., Hao, J., et al. (2014) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2014.03.007 · Cited by 22
Guberman, E., Sherief, H., & Regan, E. R. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.07.016 · Cited by 21
The inflammatory mediators TNFα and nitric oxide arrest spermatogonia GC-1 cell cycle
Ferreiro, M. E., Amarilla, M. S., Glienke, L., Méndez, C. S., González, C. R., Jacobo, P. V., Sobarzo, C., Laurentiis, A. D., Ferraris, J., & Theas, M. S. (2019) · Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.repbio.2019.11.001 · Cited by 19
Systems biology: perspectives on multiscale modeling in research on endocrine-related cancers
Clarke, R. C., Tyson, J. J., Tan, M. T., Baumann, W. T., Lu, J., Xuan, J., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Endocrine Related Cancer · doi:10.1530/erc-18-0309 · Cited by 21
Mathematical Modeling of p53 Pathways
Kim, E., Kim, J.-Y., & Lee, J. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20205179 · Cited by 17
Mitochondria-derived nuclear ATP surge protects against confinement-induced proliferation defects
Ghose, R., Pezzano, F., Badia, R., Kourtis, S., Sheraj, I., Das, S., Zapater, A. G., Ghose, U., Musa‐Afaneh, S., Espinar, L., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61787-x · Cited by 18
Beyond The T/C Ratio: Old And New Anticancer Activity Scores In Vivo
Ubezio, P. (2019) · Cancer Management and Research · doi:10.2147/cmar.s215729 · Cited by 15
Mapping metabolic oscillations during cell cycle progression
Roçi, I., Watrous, J. D., Lagerborg, K. A., Jain, M., & Nilsson, R. (2020) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.1080/15384101.2020.1825203 · Cited by 16
Dynamic Rendering of the Heterogeneous Cell Response to Anticancer Treatments
Falcetta, F., Lupi, M., Colombo, V., & Ubezio, P. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003293 · Cited by 14
Hip2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme overcomes radiation-induced G2/M arrest
Bae, Y., Jung, S. H., Kim, G.-Y., Rhim, H., & Kang, S. (2013) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.07.023 · Cited by 15
A general framework for modeling growth and division of mammalian cells
Gauthier, J. H., & Pohl, P. I. (2011) · BMC Systems Biology · doi:10.1186/1752-0509-5-3 · Cited by 14
Peng, J., Zhao, Y., Hong, Y., Burkhalter, R. S., Hogue, C. L., Tran, E., Wei, L., Romeo, L. E., Dolley-Sonneville, P., Melkoumian, Z. K., et al. (2018) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.7b05102 · Cited by 15
A mathematical analysis of DNA damage induced G2 phase transition
Zhang, L., Cheng, Y., & Liew, K. M. (2013) · Applied Mathematics and Computation · doi:10.1016/j.amc.2013.10.025 · Cited by 13
To senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after DNA damage
Kollárovič, G., Studencka‐Turski, M., Ivanova, L., Lauenstein, C., Heinze, K., Lapytsko, A., Talemi, S. R., Figueiredo, A. S., & Schaber, J. (2016) · Aging · doi:10.18632/aging.100883 · Cited by 11
Systems Biology of the Cancer Cell
Janes, K. A., & Lazzara, M. J. (2024) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-103122-030552 · Cited by 9
Hamed, S. S., & Roth, C. M. (2011) · Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics · doi:10.1007/s10928-011-9199-z · Cited by 10
Checkpoint Kinase and Wee1 Inhibitors as Anticancer Therapeutics
Ashwell, S. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-384999-1.10010-1 · Cited by 10
Sizek, H., Deritei, D., Fleig, K., Harris, M., Regan, P., Glass, K., & Regan, E. R. (2024) · Translational Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102084 · Cited by 9
A Two-Pulse Cellular Stimulation Test Elucidates Variability and Mechanisms in Signaling Pathways
Sumit, M., Jović, A., Neubig, R. R., Takayama, S., & Linderman, J. J. (2019) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2019.01.022 · Cited by 9
Avcu, N., & Guzelis, C. (2019) · IET Systems Biology · doi:10.1049/iet-syb.2019.0043 · Cited by 9
Bistability, Oscillations, and Traveling Waves in Frog Egg Extracts
Tyson, J. J., & Novák, B. (2014) · Bulletin of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/s11538-014-0009-9 · Cited by 9
Bellei, B., Caputo, S., Migliano, E., Lopez, G., Marcaccini, V., Cota, C., & Picardo, M. (2021) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines9060597 · Cited by 8
Lavi, O., Ginsberg, D., & Louzoun, Y. (2011) · Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering · doi:10.3934/mbe.2011.8.445 · Cited by 8
Eskiler, G. G., Çeçener, G., Egelí, Ü., & Tunca, B. (2019) · Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology · doi:10.1002/jbt.22286 · Cited by 8
Pérez‐Martín, J. (2011) · Topics in current genetics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22916-9_6 · Cited by 8
Two‐dimensional polynomial type canonical relaxation oscillator model for p53 dynamics
Demirkıran, G., Demir, G. K., & Guzelis, C. (2018) · IET Systems Biology · doi:10.1049/iet-syb.2017.0077 · Cited by 7
Phan, K. S., Do, H. N., Doan, B., Le, T. T. H., Mai, T. T. T., Nguyen, Q. B. N., Dong, T. N., Ha, B. H. B., Dang, V. D., Dang, L. H., et al. (2024) · ChemMedChem · doi:10.1002/cmdc.202400586 · Cited by 6
Kinsella, T. J., Gürkan-Çavusoglu, E., Du, W., & Loparo, K. A. (2011) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2011.00020 · Cited by 6
Dynamical principles of cell-cycle arrest: Reversible, irreversible, and mixed strategies
Pfeuty, B. (2012) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.86.021917 · Cited by 6
Deciphering p53 dynamics and cell fate in DNA damage response using mathematical modeling
Yang, N., Sun, T., & Shen, P. (2020) · Genome Instability & Disease · doi:10.1007/s42764-020-00019-6 · Cited by 6
Tummala, H., Goltsov, A., Khalil, H. S., Sproul, A. M., Scott, F. E., Mitev, V., & Zhelev, N. (2012) · Biodiscovery · doi:10.7750/biodiscovery.2012.6.4 · Cited by 4
Role of IFNLR1 gene in PRRSV infection of PAM cells
Qin, M., Chen, W., Li, Z., Wang, L., Ma, L., Geng, J., Zhang, Y., Zhao, J., & Zeng, Y. (2021) · Journal of Veterinary Science · doi:10.4142/jvs.2021.22.e39 · Cited by 7
A Canonical 3-D P53 Network Model that Determines Cell Fate by Counting Pulses
Demirkıran, G., Demir, G. K., & Guzelis, C. (2018) · Istanbul University - Journal of Electrical & Electronics Engineering · doi:10.26650/electrica.2018.02664 · Cited by 4
Cytogenotoxic screening of the natural compound niga‐ichigoside F1 from Rubus imperialis (Rosaceae)
Almeida‐Terassi, L. M., Castanha, A. P. M., Alves, G. R., Filho, V. C., Niero, R., Gaivão, I., de Oliveira, L. M., de Lima, L. V. A., Mantovani, M. S., & Maistro, E. L. (2024) · Journal of Applied Toxicology · doi:10.1002/jat.4608 · Cited by 4
Cappella, P., Giorgini, M. L., Re, C. E., Ubezio, P., Ciomei, M., & Moll, J. K. (2010) · Cytometry Part A · doi:10.1002/cyto.a.20962 · Cited by 4
Li, X., Zheng, Y., Yu, K., Hou, S., Cui, H., Yin, R., Zhou, Y., Sun, Q., Zhang, J., & Huang, C. (2024) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-023-09104-x · Cited by 3
Role of Computational Modeling in Understanding Cell Cycle Oscillators
Csikász‐Nagy, A., & Mura, I. (2015) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2957-3_3 · Cited by 3
Analysis of cell cycle dynamics using probabilistic cell cycle models
Gürkan-Çavusoglu, E., Schupp, J. E., Kinsella, T. J., & Loparo, K. A. (2011) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2011.6089914 · Cited by 3
Gürkan-Çavusoglu, E., Schupp, J. E., Kinsella, T. J., & Loparo, K. A. (2013) · IET Systems Biology · doi:10.1049/iet-syb.2012.0050 · Cited by 3
Borland, D., Yi, H., Grant, G. D., Kedziora, K. M., Chao, H. X., Haggerty, R. A., Kumar, J., Wolff, S. C., Cook, J. G., & Purvis, J. E. (2018) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2018.06.004 · Cited by 3
Miao, X., Koch, G., Shen, S., Wang, X., Li, J., Shen, X., Qu, J., Straubinger, R. M., & Jusko, W. J. (2023) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2023.10.036 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Toettcher, J. E., Loewer, A., Ostheimer, G. J., Yaffe, M. B., Tidor, B., & Lahav, G.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Center for Cancer Research (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Toettcher, Jared E.
- Loewer, Alexander
- Lahav, Galit
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-01-20
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 785-790
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC2630102
- OpenAlex
- W2041969498
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (CA112967)
- National Cancer Institute (U54CA112967)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM083303, GM083303, R01GM058762, R01GM065418, P50 GM58762)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
- Keywords
- cell cycle arrest, DNA damage response, p21, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition, cell cycle re-entry, endoreduplication, ionizing radiation, genome stability
- MeSH terms
- Cell Cycle, DNA Damage, Humans, Models, Biological, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, G1 Phase, G2 Phase, Cyclins, HCT116 Cells, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review