Cited by 340Cytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Reversible methylation of promoter-bound STAT3 by histone-modifying enzymes

Open access
Yang, Jinbo, Huang, Jing, Dasgupta, Maupali, Sears, Nathan, Miyagi, Masaru, Wang, Benlian, Chance, Mark R., Chen, Xing +8 more·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Following its tyrosine phosphorylation, STAT3 is methylated on K140 by the histone methyl transferase SET9 and demethylated by LSD1 when it is bound to a subset of the promoters that it activates. Methylation of K140 is a negative regulatory event, because its blockade greatly increases the steady-state amount of activated STAT3 and the expression of many (i.e., SOCS3 ) but not all (i.e., CD14 ) STAT3 target genes. Biological relevance is shown by the observation that overexpression of SOCS3 when K140 cannot be methylated blocks the ability of cells to activate STAT3 in response to IL-6. K140 methylation does not occur with mutants of STAT3 that do not enter nuclei or bind to DNA. Following treatment with IL-6, events at the SOCS3 promoter occur in an ordered sequence, as shown by chromatin immunoprecipitations. Y705-phosphoryl-STAT3 binds first and S727 is then phosphorylated, followed by the coincident binding of SET9 and dimethylation of K140, and lastly by the binding of LSD1. We conclude that the lysine methylation of promoter-bound STAT3 leads to biologically important down-regulation of the dependent responses and that SET9, which is known to help provide an activating methylation mark to H3K4, is recruited to the newly activated SOCS3 promoter by STAT3.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1016147107

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • pS727 in the nucleus is required for recruitment of histone lysine methyltransferase SET9, which dimethylates STAT3 at Lys140, leading to pY705 inhibition.

    “Mechanistically, pS727 in the nucleus is required for the recruitment of histone lysine methyltransferase SET9, which dimethylates STAT3 at Lys140, leading to pY705 inhibition (Yang et al., 2010).”

    From Targeting Janus Kinases and Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 To Treat Inflammation, Fibrosis, and Cancer: Rationale, Progress, and Caution (2020) · cites this paper as Yang et al., 2010

    The Results show that nuclear, DNA-bound STAT3 requires S727 phosphorylation for K140 dimethylation, and that SET9 is required for that modification. They also report greater and more sustained Y705 phosphorylation when K140 cannot be methylated. But the Discussion presents recruitment of SET9 by phosphorylated S727 only as a possibility, and the Results say the mechanistic link between K140 methylation and Y705 phosphorylation is unclear. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. [1]Strahl BD, Allis CD. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature. 2000;403(6765):41–45. doi: 10.1038/47412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  2. [3]Huang J, Berger SL. The emerging field of dynamic lysine methylation of non-histone proteins. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2008;18:152–158. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2008.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  3. [4]Ea CK, Baltimore D. Regulation of NF-kappaB activity through lysine monomethylation of p65. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:18972–18977. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910439106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. [5]Lu T, et al. Regulation of NF-kappaB by NSD1/FBXL11-dependent reversible lysine methylation of p65. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(1):46–51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912493107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  5. [6]Akira S, et al. Molecular cloning of APRF, a novel IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 p91-related transcription factor involved in the gp130-mediated signaling pathway. Cell. 1994;77(1):63–71. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90235-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  6. [7]Yuan ZL, Guan YJ, Chatterjee D, Chin YE. Stat3 dimerization regulated by reversible acetylation of a single lysine residue. Science. 2005;307:269–273. doi: 10.1126/science.1105166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  7. [8]O'Shea JJ, Kanno Y, Chen X, Levy DE. Cell signaling. Stat acetylation—A key facet of cytokine signaling? Science. 2005;307:217–218. doi: 10.1126/science.1108164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  8. [9]Ray S, Boldogh I, Brasier AR. STAT3 NH2-terminal acetylation is activated by the hepatic acute-phase response and required for IL-6 induction of angiotensinogen. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1616–1632. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.07.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  9. [10]McKendry R, et al. High-frequency mutagenesis of human cells and characterization of a mutant unresponsive to both alpha and gamma interferons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:11455–11459. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.24.11455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. [11]Ma J, Zhang T, Novotny-Diermayr V, Tan AL, Cao X. A novel sequence in the coiled-coil domain of Stat3 essential for its nuclear translocation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:29252–29260. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304196200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  11. [12]Sadzak I, et al. Recruitment of Stat1 to chromatin is required for interferon-induced serine phosphorylation of Stat1 transactivation domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:8944–8949. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801794105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  12. [13]Chuikov S, et al. Regulation of p53 activity through lysine methylation. Nature. 2004;432:353–360. doi: 10.1038/nature03117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  13. [14]Becker S, Groner B, Müller CW. Three-dimensional structure of the Stat3beta homodimer bound to DNA. Nature. 1998;394(6689):145–151. doi: 10.1038/28101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. [15]Braunstein J, Brutsaert S, Olson R, Schindler C. STATs dimerize in the absence of phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:34133–34140. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304531200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  15. [16]Shi Y, et al. Histone demethylation mediated by the nuclear amine oxidase homolog LSD1. Cell. 2004;119:941–953. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  16. [17]Metzger E, et al. LSD1 demethylates repressive histone marks to promote androgen-receptor-dependent transcription. Nature. 2005;437:436–439. doi: 10.1038/nature04020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. [18]Huang J, et al. p53 is regulated by the lysine demethylase LSD1. Nature. 2007;449(7158):105–108. doi: 10.1038/nature06092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  18. [19]Wang J, et al. The lysine demethylase LSD1 (KDM1) is required for maintenance of global DNA methylation. Nat Genet. 2009;41:125–129. doi: 10.1038/ng.268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  19. [20]Li B, Carey M, Workman JL. The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell. 2007;128:707–719. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  20. [21]Berger SL. The complex language of chromatin regulation during transcription. Nature. 2007;447:407–412. doi: 10.1038/nature05915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  21. [22]Huang J, et al. Repression of p53 activity by Smyd2-mediated methylation. Nature. 2006;444:629–632. doi: 10.1038/nature05287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  22. [23]Ivanov GS, et al. Methylation-acetylation interplay activates p53 in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:6756–6769. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00460-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  23. [24]Shi X, et al. Modulation of p53 function by SET8-mediated methylation at lysine 382. Mol Cell. 2007;27:636–646. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  24. [25]Kwon T, et al. Mechanism of histone lysine methyl transfer revealed by the structure of SET7/9-AdoMet. EMBO J. 2003;22:292–303. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  25. [26]Chakrabarti SK, Francis J, Ziesmann SM, Garmey JC, Mirmira RG. Covalent histone modifications underlie the developmental regulation of insulin gene transcription in pancreatic beta cells. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:23617–23623. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303423200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  26. [27]Francis J, Chakrabarti SK, Garmey JC, Mirmira RG. Pdx-1 links histone H3-Lys-4 methylation to RNA polymerase II elongation during activation of insulin transcription. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:36244–36253. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M505741200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, J., Huang, J., Dasgupta, M., Sears, N., Miyagi, M., Wang, B., Chance, M. R., Chen, X., Du, Y., Wang, Y., An, L., Wang, Q., Lu, T., Zhang, X., Wang, Z., & Stark, G. R.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Department of Molecular Genetics, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195;
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Center for Proteomics and Bioinformatics and
  • Lanzhou University (CN)
  • Case Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-11-23
Volume
107
Issue
50
Pages
21499-21504
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2014596538
Cited by
340
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 18
FWCI
8.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lanzhou University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University
  • National Cancer Institute (P01-CA 62220, R01CA127590, P01CA062220)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
STAT3, lysine methylation, LSD1, histone demethylation, SOCS3, IL-6 signaling, tyrosine phosphorylation, transcriptional regulation, chromatin recruitment, negative transcriptional regulation
MeSH terms
Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3 Protein, Cell Line, Histones, Humans, Lysine, Methylation, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase, Interleukin-6, Active Transport, Cell Nucleus, STAT3 Transcription Factor, Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling Proteins, Histone Demethylases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review