Cited by 31Cytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Genomic and computational approaches to dissect the mechanisms of STAT3’s universal and cell type-specific functions

Open access
Hutchins, Andrew Paul, Diez, Diego, Miranda-Saavedra, Diego·2013·JAK-STAT

Abstract

STAT3 is the quintessential pleiotropic transcription factor with many biological roles throughout development as well as in multiple adult tissues. Its functional heterogeneity is encoded in the range of genome-wide binding patterns that specify different regulatory networks in distinct cell types. However, STAT3 does not display remarkable DNA binding preferences that may help correlate specific motifs with individual biological functions or cell types. Therefore, achieving a detailed understanding of the regulatory mechanisms that endow STAT3 (or any other pleiotropic transcription factor) with such a rainbow of functions is not only a central problem in biology but also a fiendishly difficult one. Here we describe key genomic and computational approaches that have shed light into this question, and present the two current models of STAT3 binding (universal and cell type-specific). We also discuss the role that the local epigenetic environment plays in the selection of STAT3 binding sites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/jkst.25097

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hutchins, A. P., Diez, D., & Miranda-Saavedra, D.
Affiliations
Immunology Frontier Research Center, The University of Osaka (JP)
Venue
JAK-STAT
Published
2013-10-16
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
e25097
ISSN
  • 2162-3988 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-3996
OpenAlex
W2079761398
Cited by
31
References
108
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAK-STAT (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
STAT3, cell type-specific gene regulation, transcription factor binding sites, DNA-binding motifs, epigenetic regulation, transcriptional regulatory networks, JAK/STAT signaling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review