Cited by 313Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The role of the striatum in social behavior

Open access
Báez-Mendoza, Raymundo, Schultz, Wolfram·2013·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

Where and how does the brain code reward during social behavior? Almost all elements of the brain's reward circuit are modulated during social behavior. The striatum in particular is activated by rewards in social situations. However, its role in social behavior is still poorly understood. Here, we attempt to review its participation in social behaviors of different species ranging from voles to humans. Human fMRI experiments show that the striatum is reliably active in relation to others' rewards, to reward inequity and also while learning about social agents. Social contact and rearing conditions have long-lasting effects on behavior, striatal anatomy and physiology in rodents and primates. The striatum also plays a critical role in pair-bond formation and maintenance in monogamous voles. We review recent findings from single neuron recordings showing that the striatum contains cells that link own reward to self or others' actions. These signals might be used to solve the agency-credit assignment problem: the question of whose action was responsible for the reward. Activity in the striatum has been hypothesized to integrate actions with rewards. The picture that emerges from this review is that the striatum is a general-purpose subcortical region capable of integrating social information into coding of social action and reward.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2013.00233

Cites

168 of 168 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Activation of the brain's reward circuitry is mediated by the release of dopamine, a neurotransmitter associated with pleasure and reward.

    “This activation is mediated by the release of dopamine, a neurotransmitter associated with pleasure and reward (Báez-Mendoza and Schultz, 2013).”

    From The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Báez-Mendoza and Schultz, 2013

    The Social reward section (page unavailable) reports that rewards are associated with positive emotions and that social rewards increase striatal activity. The Social contact and striatal function section discusses dopamine release in the ventral striatum, but it does not say that dopamine release mediates the reward-circuit activation described in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Excessive digital use, particularly related to activities such as social media and gaming, can trigger addictive behaviors by activating the brain's reward circuitry.

    “Research has shown that excessive digital use, particularly related to activities such as social media and gaming, can trigger addictive behaviors by activating the brain's reward circuitry.”

    From The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Báez-Mendoza and Schultz, 2013

    The Social reward section reports that social rewards are associated with activity in the striatum, a component of the brain’s reward circuitry. It does not address excessive digital use, social media or gaming, or show that these activities trigger addictive behavior; searches for digital use and internet addiction found no relevant passage. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 171 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Báez-Mendoza R. Hoffman K. L. (2009). Object ontology in temporal lobe ensembles, in Cortical Mechanisms of Vision, 1st Edn., eds Jenkin M. Harris L. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 237– 253
  2. Dawkins R. (2006). The Selfish Gene: – with a New Introduction by the Author. Oxford: University Press
  3. Hall F. S. Wilkinson L. S. Humby T. Robbins T. W. (1999). Maternal deprivation of neonatal rats produces enduring changes in dopamine function. Synapse 32, 37– 43 10188636

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Báez-Mendoza, R., & Schultz, W.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Báez-Mendoza, Raymundo
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2013
Volume
7
Pages
233-233
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116794070
Cited by
312
References
171
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 11
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (095495)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
striatum, social behavior, reward coding, social reward, reward inequity, social learning, pair bonding, social contact, rearing conditions, single-unit recording, reward systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review