Cited by 40Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

A stable hippocampal representation of a space requires its direct experience

Open access
Rowland, David C., Yanovich, Yelizaveta, Kentros, Clifford G.·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

In humans and other mammals, the hippocampus is critical for episodic memory, the autobiographical record of events, including where and when they happen. When one records from hippocampal pyramidal neurons in awake, behaving rodents, their most obvious firing correlate is the animal's position within a particular environment, earning them the name "place cells." When an animal explores a novel environment, its pyramidal neurons form their spatial receptive fields over a matter of minutes and are generally stable thereafter. This experience-dependent stabilization of place fields is therefore an attractive candidate neural correlate of the formation of hippocampal memory. However, precisely how the animal's experience of a context translates into stable place fields remains largely unclear. For instance, we still do not know whether observation of a space is sufficient to generate a stable hippocampal representation of that space because the animal must physically visit a spot to demonstrate which cells fire there. We circumvented this problem by comparing the relative stability of place fields of directly experienced space from merely observed space following blockade of NMDA receptors, which preferentially destabilizes newly generated place fields. This allowed us to determine whether place cells stably represent parts of the environment the animal sees, but does not actually occupy. We found that the formation of stable place fields clearly requires direct experience with…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1105445108

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pharmacological blockade of NMDARs prevents the stabilization of new place fields.

    “However, pharmacological blockade of NMDARs prevents the stabilization of new place fields (418, 419)”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [418]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rowland, D. C., Yanovich, Y., & Kentros, C. G.
Affiliations
  • Departments of aBiology and
  • University of Oregon (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-08-18
Volume
108
Issue
35
Pages
14654-14658
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2170347881
Cited by
40
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007257)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
place cells, hippocampus, episodic memory, spatial memory, NMDA receptor blockade, novel environment exploration, direct experience, spatial receptive fields, hippocampal pyramidal neurons, autobiographical memory
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Piperazines, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review