Cited by 41Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural dynamics and brain functionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Distinct patterns of functional brain connectivity correlate with objective performance and subjective beliefs

Open access
Barttfeld, Pablo, Wicker, Bruno, McAleer, Phil, Belin, Pascal, Cojan, Yann, Graziano, Martín, Leiguarda, Ramón, Sigman, Mariano·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The degree of correspondence between objective performance and subjective beliefs varies widely across individuals. Here we demonstrate that functional brain network connectivity measured before exposure to a perceptual decision task covaries with individual objective (type-I performance) and subjective (type-II performance) accuracy. Increases in connectivity with type-II performance were observed in networks measured while participants directed attention inward (focus on respiration), but not in networks measured during states of neutral (resting state) or exogenous attention. Measures of type-I performance were less sensitive to the subjects' specific attentional states from which the networks were derived. These results suggest the existence of functional brain networks indexing objective performance and accuracy of subjective beliefs distinctively expressed in a set of stable mental states.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1301353110

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This variability in confidence accuracy has been related to individual differences in brain structure and function.

    “This variability has been related to individual differences in brain structure and function (Barttfeld et al., 2013;Fleming, Weil, Nagy, Dolan, & Rees, 2010).”

    From Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments (2016) · cites this paper as Barttfeld et al., 2013

  • The capacity of confidence to distinguish correct from incorrect knowledge can vary markedly between subjects for a given task.

    “research in behavioral economics and cognitive sciences has repeatedly shown that the capacity of confidence to distinguish correct from incorrect knowledge -henceforth referred as the accuracy of confidence -can vary markedly between subjects for a given task.”

    From Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments (2016) · cites this paper as Barttfeld et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Fleming SM, Weil RS, Nagy Z, Dolan RJ, Rees G (2010) Relating introspective accuracy to individual differences in brain structure. Science 329(5998):1541-1543.
  2. Fox MD, et al. (2005) The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anti- correlated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(27):9673-9678.
  3. Dosenbach NU, et al. (2010) Prediction of individual brain maturity using fMRI. Science 329(5997):1358-1361.
  4. Supekar K, Menon V, Rubin D, Musen M, Greicius MD (2008) Network analysis of intrinsic functional brain connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. PLOS Comput Biol 4(6): e1000100.
  5. Achard S, Salvador R, Whitcher B, Suckling J, Bullmore E (2006) A resilient, low-frequency, small-world human brain functional network with highly connected association cortical hubs. J Neurosci 26(1):63-72.
  6. Raichle ME (2009) A paradigm shift in functional brain imaging. J Neurosci 29(41): 12729-12734.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barttfeld, P., Wicker, B., McAleer, P., Belin, P., Cojan, Y., Graziano, M., Leiguarda, R., & Sigman, M.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
  • Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina;
  • Universidad Torcuato Di Tella (AR)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-06-25
Volume
110
Issue
28
Pages
11577-11582
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2143584007
Cited by
41
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-IDEX-0001)
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Universidad de Buenos Aires (CONICET)
  • Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos Aires
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
brain functional connectivity, subjective beliefs, objective performance, attentional state, resting state, bottom-up attention, individual differences, metacognition, self-monitoring
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review