Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 330

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dissociating the role of the medial and lateral anterior prefrontal cortex in human planning

Open access
Koechlin, Etienne, Corrado, Gregory, Pietrini, Pietro, Grafman, Jordan·2000·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.130177397
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The anterior prefrontal cortex is known to subserve higher cognitive functions such as task management and planning. Less is known, however, about the functional specialization of this cortical region in humans. Using functional MRI, we report a double dissociation: the medial anterior prefrontal cortex, in association with the ventral striatum, was engaged preferentially when subjects executed tasks in sequences that were expected, whereas the polar prefrontal cortex, in association with the dorsolateral striatum, was involved preferentially when subjects performed tasks in sequences that were contingent on unpredictable events. These results parallel the functional segregation previously described between the medial and lateral premotor cortex underlying planned and contingent motor control and extend this division to the anterior prefrontal cortex, when task management and planning are required. Thus, our findings support the assumption that common frontal organizational principles underlie motor and higher executive functions in humans.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.130177397

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. A R Luria Frontal Lobes Syndromes, eds P J Vinken, G W Bruyn (North Holland, Amsterdam) 2, 725–757 (1969).
  2. J M Fuster The Prefrontal Cortex: Anatomy, Physiology, and Neuropsychology of the Frontal Lobe (Raven, New York, 1989).
  3. D T Stuss, D F Benson The Frontal Lobes (Raven, New York, 1986).
  4. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38145.x · DOI
  5. 10.1093/brain/120.10.1805 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00133-6 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/363623a0 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/386608a0 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1073/pnas.90.3.878 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/378279a0 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/20178 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00029-4 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1126/science.8316836 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1093/cercor/6.1.39 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/0014-4886(82)90238-2 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s002210050740 · DOI
  17. 10.1073/pnas.95.25.15008 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1997.tb01487.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. E D Sacerdoti Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Tbilisi, USSR), pp. 206–214 (1975).
  20. L Spector, J Grafman Planning, Neuropsychology, and Artificial Intelligence: Cross-Fertilization, eds F Boller, J Grafman (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam) 9, 377–392 (1994).
  21. M Georgeff, A Lansky Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA), pp. 667–682 (1987).
  22. R Firby Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA), pp. 202–206 (1987).
  23. 10.1152/jn.1991.66.3.705 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/371413a0 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/BF00230650 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/BF00230649 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/BF00231461 · DOI
  28. 10.1152/jn.1996.75.1.233 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/brain/120.9.1587 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.3758/BF03200583 · DOI
  31. J Talairach, P Tournoux Co-Planar Stereoaxic Atlas of the Human Brain (Thieme Medical, New York, 1988).
  32. 10.1038/jcbfm.1991.122 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00072-9 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1093/brain/117.5.1055 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00038-4 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00868-4 · DOI
  37. M Shidara, B J Richmond Soc Neurosci Abstr 25, 878, (abstr.). (1999).
  38. E Procyk Ph.D. thesis (Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France, 1999).
  39. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-12-04595.1992 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-07-02613.1998 · DOI
  41. D N Pandya, E H Yeterian Neurobiology of Decision Making, eds A R Damasio, H Damasio, Y Christen (Springer, Berlin), pp. 13–46 (1996). · DOI
  42. D N Pandya, C L Barnes The Frontal Lobes Revisited, ed E Perecman (IRBN, New York), pp. 61–72 (1987).

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Koechlin, E., Corrado, G., Pietrini, P., & Grafman, J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2000-06-13
Volume
97
Issue
13
Pages
7651-7656
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.130177397
OpenAlex
W1965741498
Cited by
330
References
9
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.