Cited by 142Biofuel production and bioconversionBioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentBioenergy crop production and management

Biofuels and Their Co-Products as Livestock Feed: Global Economic and Environmental Implications

Open access
Popp, József, Harangi-Rákos, Mónika, Gabnai, Zoltán, Balogh, Péter, Antal, Gabriella, Bai, Attila·2016·Molecules

Abstract

This review studies biofuel expansion in terms of competition between conventional and advanced biofuels based on bioenergy potential. Production of advanced biofuels is generally more expensive than current biofuels because products are not yet cost competitive. What is overlooked in the discussion about biofuel is the contribution the industry makes to the global animal feed supply and land use for cultivation of feedstocks. The global ethanol industry produces 44 million metric tonnes of high-quality feed, however, the co-products of biodiesel production have a moderate impact on the feed market contributing to just 8–9 million tonnes of protein meal output a year. By economically displacing traditional feed ingredients co-products from biofuel production are an important and valuable component of the biofuels sector and the global feed market. The return of co-products to the feed market has agricultural land use (and GHG emissions) implications as well. The use of co-products generated from grains and oilseeds can reduce net land use by 11% to 40%. The proportion of global cropland used for biofuels is currently some 2% (30–35 million hectares). By adding co-products substituted for grains and oilseeds the land required for cultivation of feedstocks declines to 1.5% of the global crop area.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/molecules21030285

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ethanol is currently the most widely used biofuel globally, accounting for approximately 80% of all liquid biofuel production.

    “Ethanol is currently the most widely used biofuel globally, accounting for approximately 80% of all liquid biofuel production [15,16].”
  • The first major challenge is the high cost of biofuel (bioethanol) production and its economic feasibility compared to the price of crude oil.

    “The first major challenge is the production cost, i.e., high cost of the biofuel (bioethanol) production and its economic feasibility compared to the price of crude oil [29,38,42,59].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [18]Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 2011 246
  2. [20]Global Energy Assessment Global Energy Assessment—Toward a Sustainable Future Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 2012 113
  3. [59]International Energy Agency Algae—The Future for Bioenergy? Summary and Conclusions from the Iea Bioenergy Exco64 Workshop International Energy Agency Paris, France 2010 16
  4. [99]National Research Council Renewable Fuel Standard: Potential Economic and Environmental Effects of U.S. Biofuel Policy The National Academies Press Washington, DC, USA 2011 250

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Popp, J., Harangi-Rákos, M., Gabnai, Z., Balogh, P., Antal, G., & Bai, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Debrecen (HU)
  • Institute of Sectoral Economics and Methodology, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen 4032, Hungary
Corresponding author
Antal, Gabriella
Venue
Molecules
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2016-02-29
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
285
ISSN
1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2276876089
Cited by
142
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
Keywords
biofuels, biofuel co-products, animal feed, ethanol industry, biodiesel, protein meal, feed market, land use, cropland, greenhouse gas emissions, advanced biofuels
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Ethanol, Animals, Animal Feed, Crops, Agricultural, Biofuels, Livestock, Renewable Energy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review