Cited by 47TGF-β signaling in diseasesVascular Anomalies and TreatmentsGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Genetic variants of Adam17 differentially regulate TGFβ signaling to modify vascular pathology in mice and humans

Open access
Kawasaki, Kyoko, Freimuth, Julia, Meyer, Dominique S., Lee, Marie M., Tochimoto-Okamoto, Akiko, Benzinou, Michael, Clermont, Frederic F., Wu, Gloria +9 more·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Down-regulation of TGFβ signaling is a therapeutic strategy for several disease applications, particularly cancer and fibrosis. However, TGFβ blockade may have adverse effects because TGFβ signaling is necessary for formation and maintenance of normal blood vessels. Because side effects may vary between individuals due to innate differences in genetic makeup, it is important to find which interindividual genetic variants regulate responses to reduced TGFβ signaling and how these operate at the molecular level. Here we identified polymorphic variants of mouse a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 that differentially regulate TGFβ signaling output and influence the severity of Tgfb1- dependent vascular pathology. This has relevance to risk assessment for clinical manifestations in TGFβ-driven diseases, as well as for prediction of desirable and undesirable responses to anti-TGFβ therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1318761111

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The colon microbiome can influence systemic responses to immune checkpoint blockade.

    “Furthermore, the colon microbiome can also influence systemic responses to immune checkpoint blockade393,394,402.”

    From TGFβ biology in cancer progression and immunotherapy (2021) · cites this paper as [393]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kawasaki, K., Freimuth, J., Meyer, D. S., Lee, M. M., Tochimoto-Okamoto, A., Benzinou, M., Clermont, F. F., Wu, G., Roy, R., Letteboer, T. G. W., Ploos van Amstel, J. K., Giraud, S., Dupuis-Girod, S., Lesca, G., Westermann, C. J. J., Coffey, R. J., & Akhurst, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre, KC04.084.2, Utrecht, The Netherlands;
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR)
  • French Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia Reference Center, Department of Medical Genetics, Lyon University Hospital, 69622 Villeurbanne, France;
  • St. Antonius Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-05-08
Volume
111
Issue
21
Pages
7723-7728
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2155002295
Cited by
47
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • Belgian American Educational Foundation
  • Uehara Memorial Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl078564-05)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL078564, R01-HL078564)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA116019, CA116019, R01CA046413)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM060514, GM60514)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › TGF-β signaling in diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Vascular Anomalies and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
ADAM17, TGF-beta signaling, Smad2, genetic polymorphism, endothelial progenitor cells, angiogenesis, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia, CD105, ALK1, pulmonary arteriovenous malformation, vascular disease, modifier locus
MeSH terms
ADAM17 Protein, Animals, Blood Vessels, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Luciferases, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Genetic Variation, Signal Transduction, Transforming Growth Factor beta, NIH 3T3 Cells, Mice, ADAM Proteins, Smad2 Protein, Transforming Growth Factor beta1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review