Cited by 617Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeurological disorders and treatments

Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases

Open access
Fox, Michael D., Buckner, Randy L., Liu, Hesheng, Chakravarty, M. Mallar, Lozano, Andres M., Pascual-Leone, Alvaro·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Brain stimulation, a therapy increasingly used for neurological and psychiatric disease, traditionally is divided into invasive approaches, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), and noninvasive approaches, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation. The relationship between these approaches is unknown, therapeutic mechanisms remain unclear, and the ideal stimulation site for a given technique is often ambiguous, limiting optimization of the stimulation and its application in further disorders. In this article, we identify diseases treated with both types of stimulation, list the stimulation sites thought to be most effective in each disease, and test the hypothesis that these sites are different nodes within the same brain network as defined by resting-state functional-connectivity MRI. Sites where DBS was effective were functionally connected to sites where noninvasive brain stimulation was effective across diseases including depression, Parkinson's disease, obsessive-compulsive disorder, essential tremor, addiction, pain, minimally conscious states, and Alzheimer's disease. A lack of functional connectivity identified sites where stimulation was ineffective, and the sign of the correlation related to whether excitatory or inhibitory noninvasive stimulation was found clinically effective. These results suggest that resting-state functional connectivity may be useful for translating therapy between stimulation modalities, optimizing treatment, and identifying new stimulation targets. More broadly, this work supports a network perspective toward understanding and treating neuropsychiatric disease, highlighting the therapeutic potential of targeted brain network modulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1405003111

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The default mode network (DMN) is a synchronous set of dispersed brain regions continuously active at rest, but showing reduced activity during cognitively effortful tasks.

    “Central to this frame-shift in thinking was the discovery of the so-called default mode network (DMN), a synchronous set of dispersed brain regions continuously active at rest, but showing reduced activity during cognitively effortful tasks.38,39,95”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fox, M. D., Buckner, R. L., Liu, H., Chakravarty, M. M., Lozano, A. M., & Pascual-Leone, A.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
  • Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8; and
  • Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215;
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-09-29
Volume
111
Issue
41
Pages
E4367-75
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2046558738
Cited by
617
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 1
FWCI
26.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
  • American Brain Foundation
  • American Academy of Neurology
  • Harvard Catalyst (UL1-RR025758, RR025758)
  • National Football League Players Association
  • National Institutes of Health (R21 HD07616)
  • National Institute on Aging (P50AG005134, P30AG062421)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH099196)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23NS083741, R01NS073601, R21NS082870, K25NS069805, R21NS085491)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025758)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD07616, R01HD069776)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
resting-state functional connectivity, deep brain stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, stimulation target selection, depression, Parkinson's disease, obsessive-compulsive disorder, essential tremor, addiction, pain, minimally conscious state, Alzheimer's disease, neuropsychiatric disorders, brain network modulation
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Brain, Humans, Nerve Net, Nervous System Diseases, Rest, Deep Brain Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review