Cited by 231Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsNeural dynamics and brain function

Architecture of the cerebral cortical association connectome underlying cognition

Open access
Bota, Mihail, Sporns, Olaf, Swanson, Larry W.·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Cognition presumably emerges from neural activity in the network of association connections between cortical regions that is modulated by inputs from sensory and state systems and directs voluntary behavior by outputs to the motor system. To reveal global architectural features of the cortical association connectome, network analysis was performed on >16,000 reports of histologically defined axonal connections between cortical regions in rat. The network analysis reveals an organization into four asymmetrically interconnected modules involving the entire cortex in a topographic and topologic core-shell arrangement. There is also a topographically continuous U-shaped band of cortical areas that are highly connected with each other as well as with the rest of the cortex extending through all four modules, with the temporal pole of this band (entorhinal area) having the most cortical association connections of all. These results provide a starting point for compiling a mammalian nervous system connectome that could ultimately reveal novel correlations between genome-wide association studies and connectome-wide association studies, leading to new insights into the cellular architecture supporting cognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1504394112

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neural tracer data is the gold standard for mesoscale connectivity studies in a number of model organisms.

    “Neural tracer data is the gold standard for mesoscale connectivity studies in a number of model organisms (Bota et al., 2015; Girard et al., 2020; Jbabdi et al., 2015; Markov et al., 2014; 2013; Oh et al., 2014).”

    From The role of spatial embedding in mouse brain networks constructed from diffusion tractography and tracer injections (2021) · cites this paper as Bota et al., 2015

    The Abstract says animal histological pathway-tracing data are needed to validate diffusion tractography, and Materials and Methods describes using tracing reports for a rat cortical connectome. But the paper studies regional macroconnections, while the Discussion describes a neuron-type mesoconnectome as future work; it does not establish tracer data as the gold standard for mesoscale studies across multiple model organisms. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The LEC is a functional hub for integrating multisensory information, including both spatial and non-spatial characteristics, probably even time.

    “This matches the anatomical features of LEC, as being a functional hub for integrating multisensory information (Bota et al., 2015), including both spatial and non-spatial characteristics, probably even time (Tsao et al., 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [15]Meynert T. Der bau der Gross-Hirnrinde und seine örtlichen verschiedenheiten, nebst einem pathologisch-anatomischen corollarium. Vierteljarsschr Psychiat. 1867–1868;1:77–93. 198–217 (1867), 2:88–113 (1868) [Google Scholar]
  2. [29]Goldschmidt R. Das nervensystem von Ascaris lumbricoides und megalocephala. III. Z Wiss Zool. 1909;92:306–357. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bota, M., Sporns, O., & Swanson, L. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-04-06
Volume
112
Issue
16
Pages
E2093-101
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2069755236
Cited by
231
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 12
FWCI
17.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS050792)
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation (220020255)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
cerebral cortex, cortical connectivity, network architecture, entorhinal cortex, temporal pole, topographic connectivity, cognitive function, rat brain, genome-wide association study
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Humans, Nerve Net, Rats, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review