Cited by 2,486Race, Genetics, and SocietySocial and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites

Open access
Hoffman, Kelly M., Trawalter, Sophie, Axt, Jordan R., Oliver, M. Norman·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: The present work examines beliefs associated with racial bias in pain management, a critical health care domain with well-documented racial disparities. Specifically, this work reveals that a substantial number of white laypeople and medical students and residents hold false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites and demonstrates that these beliefs predict racial bias in pain perception and treatment recommendation accuracy. It also provides the first evidence that racial bias in pain perception is associated with racial bias in pain treatment recommendations. Taken together, this work provides evidence that false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites continue to shape the way we perceive and treat black people—they are associated with racial disparities in pain assessment and treatment recommendations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1516047113

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A substantial minority of medical students and residents report false beliefs about biological differences between racial groups.

    “a substantial minority of medical students and residents report false beliefs about biological differences between racial groups—such as Black people having thicker skin than White people.23”

    From Challenging Race-Based Medicine Through Historical Education About the Social Construction of Race (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

    Study 2 reports that about 50% of its medical-student and resident participants considered at least one false belief possibly, probably, or definitely true. The paper describes this as a sample of white medical students and residents, so the citing sentence omits a population qualifier. The paper also gives the thicker-skin belief as an example. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Without accounting for existing health disparities, generative AI systems could erroneously recommend treatments for different patients.

    “Without this consideration, generative AI systems could erroneously recommend treatments for different patients99.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Price S (1997) Whatever happened to the White athlete? Sports Illustrated 87(23): 30-55.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoffman, K. M., Trawalter, S., Axt, J. R., & Oliver, M. N.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Hoffman, Kelly M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2016-04-04
Volume
113
Issue
16
Pages
4296-4301
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2318723339
Cited by
2,486
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 201 · 2025: 286 · 2024: 365 · 2023: 456 · 2022: 363 · 2021: 357 · 2020: 211 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
64.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
racial bias, pain assessment, undertreatment of pain, racial disparities in health care, false belief, medical students, medical residents, treatment guidelines, African Americans
MeSH terms
Adult, Black or African American, Culture, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, White People, Pain Management, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review