Cited by 182Social and Intergroup PsychologyAction Observation and SynchronizationFace Recognition and Perception

Neurocognitive Basis of Racial Ingroup Bias in Empathy

Han, Shihui·2018·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Racial discrimination in social behavior, although disapproved of by many contemporary cultures, has been widely reported. Because empathy plays a key functional role in social behavior, brain imaging researchers have extensively investigated the neurocognitive underpinnings of racial ingroup bias in empathy. This research has revealed consistent evidence for increased neural responses to the perceived pain of same-race compared with other-race individuals in multiple brain regions and across multiple time-windows. Researchers have also examined neurocognitive, sociocultural, and environmental influences on racial ingroup bias in empathic neural responses, as well as explored possible interventions to reduce racial ingroup bias in empathic brain activity. These findings have important implications for understanding racial ingroup favoritism in social behavior and for improving interracial communication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.013

Cites

133 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Highlighting group boundaries can undermine empathy with those who are socially distant.

    “Highlighting group boundaries can undermine empathy with those who are socially distant 26,27”
  • Previous fMRI studies have identified increased activity in both the empathy network (e.g., aMCC and AI) and the theory-of-mind network (e.g., mPFC and TPJ) in response to ingroup pain.

    “Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have identified increased activity in both the empathy network (e.g., the anterior midcingulate [aMCC] and anterior insula [AI]) and the theory-of-mind network (e.g., the medial prefrontal cortex [mPFC] and the temporoparietal junction [TPJ]) in response to ingroup pain (Hein et al., 2010; Cikara et al., 2011; Han, 2018).”
  • A recent review documents that a racial ingroup bias in empathy has been consistently documented in brain imagery studies in Europe, Africa, Asia, and the United States.

    “A recent review documents that a racial ingroup bias in empathy has been consistently documented in brain imagery studies in Europe, Africa, Asia, and the United States [110].”
  • Experimental administration of oxytocin increases empathic brain activity to same race persons but not to persons of another race.

    “Also, the experimental administration of oxytocin increases empathic brain activity to same race persons but not to persons of another race.”
  • The racial ingroup bias is more pronounced among persons with higher implicit racial bias, individuals from cultures that are more collectivistic than individualistic in emphasis, and when individuals are exposed to harsh living conditions.

    “This research has also documented that the racial ingroup bias is more pronounced among persons with higher implicit racial bias, individuals from cultures that are more collectivistic than individualistic in emphasis, and when individuals are exposed to harsh living conditions [110].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, S.
Affiliations
Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
Han, Shihui
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
400-421
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790102739
Cited by
182
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5
FWCI
6.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31661143039, 31470986, 31421003)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
empathy, racial discrimination, own-race effect, intergroup favoritism, interracial communication
MeSH terms
Brain, Cognition, Empathy, Group Processes, Humans, Social Perception, Pain Perception, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review