Cited by 45

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SCAP/SREBP pathway is required for the full steroidogenic response to cyclic AMP

Shimizu-Albergine, Masami, Van Yserloo, Brian, Golkowski, Martin G., Ong, Shao-En, Beavo, Joseph A., Bornfeldt, Karin E.·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Luteinizing hormone stimulates production of testosterone and other steroids largely through a surge in the second messenger cAMP and subsequent activation of protein kinase A (PKA) in target cells. Rates of steroidogenesis are also dependent on the availability of cholesterol, a steroid building block. We propose, based on our results, that cAMP/PKA coordinates the functions of multiple pathways to regulate cellular cholesterol handling and synthesis and downstream steroid output. Activation of the cholesterol-sensing SCAP–SREBP2 pathway plays an important role in cAMP/PKA coordination of steroidogenesis. These cAMP/PKA-induced pathways are likely to be major regulators of sterol biosynthesis and cholesterol recharging in steroid hormone synthetic and other tissues. Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases can be targeted to promote steroidogenesis and cholesterol metabolism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1611424113

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.1124/pr.58.3.5 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/nrd4228 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.coph.2011.09.003 · DOI
  4. 10.1124/mol.110.069104 · DOI
  5. 10.1124/mol.111.076125 · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.0609483103 · DOI
  7. 10.1074/jbc.275.15.10831 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2015.11.014 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80213-5 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00263-0 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.0700907104 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.10.008 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00591-9 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81668-2 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1074/jbc.274.32.22795 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1073/pnas.182412799 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1073/pnas.1534923100 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1101/gad.891301 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071813-105541 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.10.008 · DOI
  21. 10.1677/jme.1.01691 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nbt.2908 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11041 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1074/jbc.272.32.20213 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1074/jbc.M113.545699 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.12.022 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/S1388-1981(02)00364-5 · DOI
  28. 10.1074/jbc.C000449200 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)45370-2 · DOI
  30. 10.1042/bj2710809 · DOI
  31. 10.1186/1743-7075-7-47 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.018 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1128/MCB.01268-08 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1152/physrev.00003.2012 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1210/en.2010-0044 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nrm2336 · DOI
  37. 10.1210/me.2001-0262 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/S1388-1981(00)00140-2 · DOI
  39. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.90211.2008 · DOI
  40. 10.1530/REP-14-0369 · DOI
  41. 10.1210/me.2006-0534 · DOI
  42. 10.1042/bst0311120 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.3109/07435800009048587 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.mce.2008.11.029 · DOI
  45. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.63.1.193 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/0006-2952(95)02093-4 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/S0960-0760(03)00213-9 · DOI
  48. 10.1095/biolreprod.107.064238 · DOI
  49. 10.1093/nar/gku1267 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shimizu-Albergine, M., Van Yserloo, B., Golkowski, M. G., Ong, S.-E., Beavo, J. A., & Bornfeldt, K. E.
Affiliations
  • School of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195;
  • School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109;
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2016-09-06
Volume
113
Issue
38
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
45
References
2
Language
en
Funders
NIH (R01GM083926, R01GM083926-02S1, R01HL062887, P01HL092969, R01HL126028, P30DK017047, S10 OD016240)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review