Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SREBP cleavage-activating protein (SCAP) is required for increased lipid synthesis in liver induced by cholesterol deprivation and insulin elevation

Matsuda, Morihiro, Korn, Bobby S., Hammer, Robert E., Moon, Young-Ah, Komuro, Ryutaro, Horton, Jay D., Goldstein, Joseph L., Brown, Michael S., Shimomura, Iichiro·2001·Genes & Development

Abstract

In liver, the synthesis of cholesterol and fatty acids increases in response to cholesterol deprivation and insulin elevation, respectively. This regulatory mechanism underlies the adaptation to cholesterol synthesis inhibitors (statins) and high calorie diets (insulin). In nonhepatic cells, lipid synthesis is controlled by sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBPs), membrane-bound transcription factors whose active domains are released proteolytically to enter the nucleus and activate genes involved in the synthesis and uptake of cholesterol and fatty acids. SCAP (SREBP cleavage-activating protein) is a sterol-regulated escort protein that transports SREBPs from their site of synthesis in the endoplasmic reticulum to their site of cleavage in the Golgi. Here, we produced a conditional deficiency of SCAP in mouse liver by genomic recombination mediated by inducible Cre recombinase. SCAP-deficient mice showed an 80% reduction in basal rates of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in liver, owing to decreases in mRNAs encoding multiple biosynthetic enzymes. Moreover, these mRNAs failed to increase normally in response to cholesterol deprivation produced by a cholesterol synthesis inhibitor and to insulin elevation produced by a fasting–refeeding protocol. These data provide in vivo evidence that SCAP and the SREBPs are required for hepatic lipid synthesis under basal and adaptive conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.891301

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hepatic SREBP2 activity and cholesterol biosynthesis rate fall while fasting and rise greatly upon refeeding.

    “Substantial evidence supports the conclusion that hepatic SREBP2 activity and cholesterol biosynthesis rate fall while fasting and rise greatly upon refeeding, indicating the existence of feeding-responsive signaling pathways upregulating hepatic cholesterol synthesis in the presence of dietary nutrition (Horton et al., 1998; Liang et al., 2002; Matsuda et al., 2001; Slakey et al., 1972).”

    From GPR146 Deficiency Protects against Hypercholesterolemia and Atherosclerosis (2019) · cites this paper as Matsuda et al., 2001

    The Results (page unavailable) report that fasting reduced hepatic SREBP-2 mRNA and cholesterol-synthesis target-gene mRNAs in mice; refeeding raised several target-gene mRNAs above their nonfasted levels. These findings support a feeding-responsive cholesterol-synthesis pathway, but the cited passage does not establish that SREBP-2 activity and the measured rate of cholesterol biosynthesis both fell during fasting and rose greatly upon refeeding. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Ablation of Scap, Mbtps1, and Spring results in decreased cholesterol synthesis in isolated primary hepatocytes.

    “Moreover, (iv) ablation of all 3 genes results in decreased cholesterol synthesis in isolated primary hepatocytes”

    From Hepatic SREBP signaling requires SPRING to govern systemic lipid metabolism in mice and humans (2023) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Results (page unavailable in our copy) report that cholesterol synthesis fell by 84% in fresh primary hepatocytes from SCAP-disrupted mice. The paper does not report corresponding ablation experiments for Mbtps1 or Spring, so it supports only the Scap portion of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In plasma, total cholesterol and triglycerides are lower in all mice with the exception that triglycerides are largely unchanged in Spring LKO.

    “In plasma, (iii) total cholesterol and triglycerides are lower in all mice with the only exception being that the latter is largely unchanged in Spring LKO.”

    From Hepatic SREBP signaling requires SPRING to govern systemic lipid metabolism in mice and humans (2023) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Results and Tables 1–2 report lower plasma cholesterol and triglycerides in SCAP-deficient mice, although the triglyceride difference narrows with fasting. The paper studies SCAP-deficient mice, not Spring LKO mice, so it does not support the claim about unchanged triglycerides in Spring LKO or the generalization to all the mice mentioned. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The phenotype of SPRINGKO cells is highly reminiscent of cells lacking SCAP and liver-specific Scap knockout mice.

    “This is highly reminiscent of what is observed in cells lacking SCAP45 and in liver-specific Scap knockout mice46.”
  • The effect of hepatic Spring silencing on SREBP2 is similar to the phenotype observed in liver- or intestine-specific Scap knockout mice.

    “The effect on SREBP2 is similar to the phenotype observed in liver- or intestine-specific Scap knockout mice46,55”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1074/jbc.M005353200 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80213-5 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11041 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81668-2 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1073/pnas.98.4.1477 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Dietschy, 1984, Measurement of rates of cholesterol synthesis using tritiated water., J. Lipid Res., 25, 1469, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)34420-5 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S1388-1981(00)00140-2 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0168-9525(97)01377-2 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12737 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0076-6879(83)98152-1 · DOI
  11. 10.1097/00041433-199904000-00008 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.95.11.5987 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1172/JCI2961 · DOI
  14. 10.1172/JCI6246 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81362-8 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Ishibashi, 1993, Hypercholesterolemia in LDL receptor knockout mice and its reversal by adenovirus-mediated gene delivery., J. Clin. Invest., 92, 883, 10.1172/JCI116663 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1101/gad.10.9.1096 · DOI
  18. 10.1172/JCI5341 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1126/science.7660125 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1074/jbc.M004160200 · DOI
  21. McGarry, 1998, Glucose-fatty acid interactions in health and disease., Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 67, 500S, 10.1093/ajcn/67.3.500S · DOI
  22. 10.1006/geno.1996.4525 · DOI
  23. 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13709 · DOI
  24. 10.1074/jbc.273.27.17243 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11235 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00037-4 · DOI
  27. 10.1074/jbc.274.40.28549 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1101/gad.844900 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/nbt1196-1562 · DOI
  30. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.145 · DOI
  31. Sambrook J. Russell D.W. (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY), 3rd ed..
  32. 10.1074/jbc.271.43.26461 · DOI
  33. 10.1172/JCI10902 · DOI
  34. 10.1073/pnas.92.4.935 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1172/JCI118951 · DOI
  36. 10.1172/JCI119248 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1172/JCI119746 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1172/JCI119247 · DOI
  39. 10.1101/gad.12.20.3182 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1074/jbc.274.42.30028 · DOI
  41. 10.1073/pnas.96.24.13656 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00009-5 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90499-O · DOI
  44. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90234-8 · DOI
  45. Witztum J.L. (1996) Drugs used in the treatment of hyperlipoproteinemias. Goodman & Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY), pp 875–897.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Matsuda, M., Korn, B. S., Hammer, R. E., Moon, Y.-A., Komuro, R., Horton, J. D., Goldstein, J. L., Brown, M. S., & Shimomura, I.
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2001-05-15
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
1206-1216
ISSN
  • 0890-9369
  • 1549-5477
Cited by
303
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review